Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 46 · Page 1 of about 334 results (0.066 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 19 1989

Raj Pack Well Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-19-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act; Textiles Committee Act, 1963 - Sections 2; Central Excise Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Textile (Control) Order, 1986

Reported in : 1993(41)ECC285; 1993LC351(MP); 1990(50)ELT201(MP)

that the HDPE woven sacks are articles of plastic and are thus classifiable under Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The contention of the petitioners was not accepted by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Division Indore (respondent No. … the HDPE/PP tapes should be classified under Heading 39.20 is not correct.7. Similarly from Note No. 1 to Chapter 46 also it is clear that woven sacks of plastic strip of apparent width exceeding 5 mm are classifiable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-21-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378

India Ltd., Faridabad, (M/s. FIL) manufactures air-conditioning and refrigerating machinery and appliances classifiable under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.3. Assessee cleared compressors falling under tariff sub-heading 8414.10. They also cleared to its buyers separately 'fly wheel' under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2010

Commissioner of Customs C.G.O. Vs. Sonam International Shop No.9

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-07-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

conforms with the description of goods mentioned under heading No.26.36 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 48.Under the heading No.29.36, Vitamin has been defined as under: "Vitamins are active agents, usually of complex Chemical … Supplement" are different products and have different identity under the Customs Tariff, while the former is classifiable under Chapter 29, the latter is classifiable under Chapter 23. 18.Under Explanatory Note to HSN (Chapter 23), the characteristic feature … Customs Act? 4.Whether keeping in view the provisions contained in Sections 17, 46 and 47 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Bill of Entry being

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 09 2026

Hanon Automotive Systems India Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-09-2026

1975 as there is no standalone Enactment under the respective GST Regime for the purpose of classification, unlike Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Under Notification No. respective GST Enactments, reference is made to the classification … including ‘Gas Compressors’ which are used as parts of Air Conditioners in Motor Vehicles which are classified under Chapter 87 of Section XVII of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Petitioner adopted the following classification for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2003

Engee Industrial Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-26-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 2002LC531(Karnataka); 2004(164)ELT242(Kar)

the respondent-authorities. The vessels imported by the appellants are classifiable under Chapter 89.08.00 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 which reads as follows :'DESCRIPTIONRATE OF DUTYVessels and other floating structures for breaking up.Rs. 1,400/- per light displacement … 89 and 92.2.All goods falling under Heading Nos. 30.01, 32.03, 33.01, 33.03, 36.02, 44.01, 44.02, 44.03, 44.04, 44.05, 46.01, 51.05, 62,92, 69.01, 69.02, 69.03, 69.04, 69.05, 83.01, 83.15, 95.01, 95.01, 95.02, 95.03, 95.05, 95.06, 95.07 and 95.08.'12.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2002

Saraswati Steel Industries and 20 Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-2002

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC344

rods of iron and nonalloy steel, round bars, CTD bars etc. The goods being manufactured by them the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and previously in the erstwhile Tariff were classifiable under TI 25 of the First Schedule to the Old … which it was obtained.Therefore, it is stated that Notification 208/83-CE dt. 1.8.83 was amended to suitably incorporate the Chapter Sub-heading of the New Tariff Act in which re-rollable material was classifiable, i.e. chapter heading Nos. 72.15 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1990

Super Urethane Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-08-1990

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1990)LC77Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1999

Steelage Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-08-1999

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)(68)ECC419

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2007

Smt. Shahnaz HussaIn Wife of Late Shri Nasir Hussian Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-20-2007

Subject : ExciseCriminal

Reported in : 2008(227)ELT61(All)

M/s Shahnaz Ayhurvedics (accused No. 1) were infact cosmetics and toilet preparations falling under Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 attracting higher rate of Central Excise Duties while the same were misdeclared as Ayurvedic Medicine' and cleared under … well as the revenue. Vide Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise (1995) Supp. 3 SCC 462.78. Similarly, the willfulness and intent refer to mental state at the time of doing or omitting to do

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2004

Shahnaz Ayurvedics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-29-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 35C and 37B; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 2004(173)ELT337(All)

used for the care and condition of the skin and hair, and were liable to duty under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, hereinafter called the 'Act 1985'. For that purpose, the provisions of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, … proceedings initiated vide show cause notice dated 7-3-1988 were dropped. Assessee was allowed clearance of its products under Chapter 30 of the Tariff Act, 1985, as Ayurvedic medicines. Again, the same controversy arose and the proceedings initiated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial