Advanced Search Results
Hindustan Newsprint Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-30-1999
Excise
(2003)(162)ELT1125TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Central ] Excise and Custom, Daman, Vs. M/S. Gujch ...
Mumbai
Dec-16-2010
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 53, 223B, 9(2); Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 34,6
various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing modvat facility under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (herein after for … stated thus :The Respondents herein are engaged in manufacture of various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing … was revealed that the said stock had not been purposely accounted for 45 days in the RG I register. The Officers of the Appellant, therefore,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrane Betel Nut Powder Works Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central E ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-15-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 11, 35E, 35G, 35G(1), 35H and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1957; Central Excise Tariff Rules - Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Customs Act - Sections 129C(3), 129D, 129D(5) and 130E; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 15(2) and 15(3A); Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
2006(2)ALT523
product of the Appellant under Chapter subheading No. 2107.00 instead of sub-heading No.0801.00 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, (hereinafter referred to as Tariff Act). The Appellant's contention that their products were required to be classified under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce and ors.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-13-1998
Service Tax
(1999)(63)ECC709
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskForbes Gokak Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-11-1994
MRTP
(1995)(80)ELT801TriDel
show that glass moulds will be covered by Chapter Heading 70; that Chapter Heading 70.20 of the Customs Tariff Act is pari materia to Central Excise Tariff Heading 70.15.17. On the question whether glass moulds are a different … "I hold that the subject Glass Moulds alongwith the Plastic Gasket are together classified under sub-heading 7015.90 of Central Excise Tariff with duty leviable at the rates applicable from time to time. There being no justification to invoke the … 925 of HSN Explanatory Notes from classification under Chapter 70 of CETA, 1985; that in the case of Paisa Fund Glass Works, the Tribunal had
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShriram Rubber Lining Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-12-1997
Excise
(1998)(98)ELT418TriDel
emerged is in relation to any goods mentioned in the Section or Chapter Note in the schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as amounting to manufacture. The Addl.Collector has not giving any finding into which Chapter the goods fall and … case of Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise as reported in 1990 (45) E.L.T. 457, wherein it was held that the steel pipes subjected to the process of lining and coating with cement
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...
Mumbai
Oct-04-2016
Land Acquisition
dated 1st March, 2006. 12. Simultaneously, the rate of basic excise duty leviable on such tobacco products under Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, was suitably increased with no change in total excise duty. … masala not containing tobacco under the brand name Star Pan Masala classifiable under Tariff Heading 21069020 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The petitioner claims that it has discharged its VAT liability of 12.5% on the sale of such pan … tobacco under Schedule Entry A-45 of the MVAT Act, 2002. 9. Entry 45 of the Schedule A to the MVAT Act, 2002, as introduced reads
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVst Tillers and Tractors Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
May-09-2005
Service Tax
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUpper India Steel Mfg. and Engg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-04-1989
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A to 57J and 173G; Constitution of India - Article 226
1990(27)ECC228; 1990(49)ELT22(P& H)
well as that of the final products which qualified for MOD VAT Credit Scheme. Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 deals with iron and steel. Heading 73.02, in particular, deals with 'waste and scrap of iron and steel'.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChamundi Die Cast (P) Limited Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jan-23-2004
Excise
(2004)(94)ECC453
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »