Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 37 · Page 1 of about 462 results (0.031 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-i Vs. Chennai Petroleum Corpn. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(117)ECC322; 2007LC322(SC); JT2007(5)SC614; 2007(5)SCALE851; [2007]8STT168; 2007(1)LC613(SC)

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-i Vs. Chennai Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-21-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2001

M/S. Airgrill Industries and M/S. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Apr-11-2001

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(76)ECC790

Matched in: Parties M/S. Airgrill Industries and M/S. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 2000

Bamni Proteins Limited Vs. Ajay (Shri)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2000

Subject : Contempt of CourtExcise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR744

to why the Di-Calcium Phosphate (Animal Feed Grade) should not be classified under Chapter Sub-heading No. 2835.00 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, attracting Central Excise Duty @ 6 per cent ad valorem and why the Central Excise Duty to the … of the CEGAT as well as judgment of the Gujarat High Court wherein it was held that section 37-B does not empower or authorise the Board to issue directions which are contrary to the decision rendered by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Through Its Managing Director Etc.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt. Ltd.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2000

Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-04-2000

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 37B; Customs Act - Sections 12; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3 and 3(1); Bombay Sales Tax Act; Central Excise Rules - Rules 3, 43(1) and 174

Reported in : 2001(74)ECC296; 2001(131)ELT535(Guj)

manufactured product, but also those processes as are specified in relation to any goods in the section or chapter notes of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 are also brought within the ambit of … which it was clarified that 'coal-ash (cinder)' is an excisable commodity classifiable under sub-heading No. 2621.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and chargeable to appropriate rate of duty. According to the Board coal-ash (cinder) was specified in the Schedule … Central Board of Excise and Customs cannot issue a Circular under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act, which has the effect of rendering the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2002

V. Ananthraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-16-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173Q and 209A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A

Reported in : 2003(1)BomCR675; (2002)4BOMLR871; 2002LC572(Bombay); 2003(151)ELT278(Bom); 2003(3)MhLj721

under Section 3 of the Act became payable at the rates set forth in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('CET' for short). By a letter dated 22nd July, 1986 the Petitioners filed revised classification list seeking approval … to the PLC's in the year 1987-88 budget, the company filed revised classification list classifying the goods under Chapter Heading No. 84.71 which was also approved by the Excise authorities on 1st May, 1987. It is the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2002

Deputy Commissioner Vs. Rama Shenoy

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-10-2002

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963

Reported in : 2003(1)KLT720; [2004]138STC323(Ker)

not 'sugar' but the 'sugar covered under sub-headings 1701-20, 1701-31, 1701-39 and 1702-11 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985' and submitted that by virtue of the provisions of Chapter 17 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 … of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (10 of 1955)Rs. 17 per quintalRs. 21 per quintal1701-39OtherRs. 34 per quintalRs. 37 per quintal1702-11Palmyra sugarNilNil5. A contention similar to the one taken by the revenue was considered by the Supreme

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2006

Anjaleem Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2006

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1), 11A and 35L; Central Excise Traiff Act, 1985 - Sections 16; Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 2000

Reported in : (2006)108BOMLR296; 2006(194)ELT129(SC); JT2006(1)SC353; 2006(1)SCALE314; (2006)2SCC336

Matched in: Parties Anjaleem Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial