Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-i Vs. Chennai Petroleum Corpn. ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-19-2007
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
2007(117)ECC322; 2007LC322(SC); JT2007(5)SC614; 2007(5)SCALE851; [2007]8STT168; 2007(1)LC613(SC)
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-i Vs. Chennai Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-21-2007
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Airgrill Industries and M/S. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Apr-11-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)(76)ECC790
Matched in: Parties M/S. Airgrill Industries and M/S. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bamni Proteins Limited Vs. Ajay (Shri)
Mumbai
Sep-21-2000
Contempt of CourtExcise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2
2001(2)BomCR744
to why the Di-Calcium Phosphate (Animal Feed Grade) should not be classified under Chapter Sub-heading No. 2835.00 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, attracting Central Excise Duty @ 6 per cent ad valorem and why the Central Excise Duty to the … of the CEGAT as well as judgment of the Gujarat High Court wherein it was held that section 37-B does not empower or authorise the Board to issue directions which are contrary to the decision rendered by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Through Its Managing Director Etc.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAhmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Gujarat
Apr-04-2000
ExciseCivil
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 37B; Customs Act - Sections 12; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3 and 3(1); Bombay Sales Tax Act; Central Excise Rules - Rules 3, 43(1) and 174
2001(74)ECC296; 2001(131)ELT535(Guj)
manufactured product, but also those processes as are specified in relation to any goods in the section or chapter notes of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 are also brought within the ambit of … which it was clarified that 'coal-ash (cinder)' is an excisable commodity classifiable under sub-heading No. 2621.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and chargeable to appropriate rate of duty. According to the Board coal-ash (cinder) was specified in the Schedule … Central Board of Excise and Customs cannot issue a Circular under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act, which has the effect of rendering the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Ananthraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Sep-16-2002
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173Q and 209A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A
2003(1)BomCR675; (2002)4BOMLR871; 2002LC572(Bombay); 2003(151)ELT278(Bom); 2003(3)MhLj721
under Section 3 of the Act became payable at the rates set forth in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('CET' for short). By a letter dated 22nd July, 1986 the Petitioners filed revised classification list seeking approval … to the PLC's in the year 1987-88 budget, the company filed revised classification list classifying the goods under Chapter Heading No. 84.71 which was also approved by the Excise authorities on 1st May, 1987. It is the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner Vs. Rama Shenoy
Kerala
Sep-10-2002
Sales Tax
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963
2003(1)KLT720; [2004]138STC323(Ker)
not 'sugar' but the 'sugar covered under sub-headings 1701-20, 1701-31, 1701-39 and 1702-11 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985' and submitted that by virtue of the provisions of Chapter 17 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 … of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (10 of 1955)Rs. 17 per quintalRs. 21 per quintal1701-39OtherRs. 34 per quintalRs. 37 per quintal1702-11Palmyra sugarNilNil5. A contention similar to the one taken by the revenue was considered by the Supreme
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnjaleem Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahm ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-16-2006
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1), 11A and 35L; Central Excise Traiff Act, 1985 - Sections 16; Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 2000
(2006)108BOMLR296; 2006(194)ELT129(SC); JT2006(1)SC353; 2006(1)SCALE314; (2006)2SCC336
Matched in: Parties Anjaleem Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »