Advanced Search Results

Deputy Commissioner Vs. Rama Shenoy

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963

Reported in : 2003(1)KLT720; [2004]138STC323(Ker)

not 'sugar' but the 'sugar covered under sub-headings 1701-20, 1701-31, 1701-39 and 1702-11 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985' and submitted that by virtue of the provisions of Chapter 17 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

M/S. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Rules, 1944 - Rule 8; Central Excise Tariff of India, 1987-88

Reported in : AIR1997SC3620; 1997(91)ELT3(SC); JT1997(3)SC307; 1997(2)SCALE407; (1997)4SCC140; [1997]2SCR561

by the appellant. That ammonia manufactured by it which falls under Chapter 28 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('Tariff Act' for short) was captively consumed by it in its Urea Plant for manufacture of molten urea. … molten urea. It was submitted by the appellant that molten urea was classified by the excise authorities under Chapter 31, which refers to fertilisers and duty was paid on molten urea as a chemical fertiliser under Heading 31.02

itc Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1998)(77)LC411Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Commr. of Central Excise and Customs, Mumbai Vs. Bell Granito Ceramica ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11AB, 11AC and 35L; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(2) and 173Q(1); Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR328; 2006(198)ELT161(SC); 2006(5)SCALE501; (2006)5SCC188

Revenue) and Ministry of Agriculture, there was therefore no justification to invoke large limitation period to impose penalty. CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT, 1985. Chapter 31 (Fertilisers), Note 6, Heading 31.05, Sub-Heading 3105.00 (Mineral or chemical fertilizers) & Chapter 38 (Miscellaneous chemical products), Heading

V.B.C. Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)LC600Tri(Chennai)

manufacture of ammonium nitrate which has been classified by the Central Excise authorities under Chapter 31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act as a fertilizer. Merely because the said ammonium nitrate has been cleared on payment of duty under Chapter

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur Vs. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944

Reported in : 2009(164)LC101(SC); 2009(237)ELT225(SC); JT2009(6)SC29; 2009(5)SCALE396; (2009)12SCC419; 2009(3)LC1456(SC); (2009)12VatReporter39:2009AIRSCW3788

short). While Baidyanath contends that the product DML is a medicament under Chapter Sub- heading 3003.31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the stand of the Department is that the said product is a cosmetic/toiletry preparation/tooth powder classifiable under Chapter

Duratex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(139)ELT88TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. Karnataka Agro Chemicals

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2008(129)ECC53; 2008(155)LC53(SC); 2008(227)ELT12(SC); JT2008(7)SC236; 2008(9)SCALE390; (2008)7SCC343

Revenue) and Ministry of Agriculture, there was therefore no justification to invoke large limitation period to impose penalty. CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT, 1985. Chapter 31 (Fertilisers), Note 6, Heading 31.05, Sub-Heading 3105.00 (Mineral or chemical fertilizers) & Chapter 38 (Miscellaneous chemical products), Heading

Naturalle Health Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Hy ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L(B); Cental Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC505; 2003LC513(SC); 2003(158)ELT257(SC); 2003(9)SCALE542; (2004)9SCC136

classification of a product for Central Excise duty under the Central Excise and Salt Act 1944 and the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 and that when there is no definition of any word in the relevant statute, the word must be … 1996 is: 3. Whether the products 'Sloan's Balm' and 'Sloan's Rub' are ayurvedic medicines and are classifiable under Chapter Heading 3003-30 as contended by the appellants attracting nil rate duty OR Classified under Chapter sub-heading 3003.10 chargeable

Super Engineering Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1996)(82)ELT539TriDel

26A of Central Excise Tariff as it existed prior to 28-2-1986, or thereafter under Chapter 74 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, as the case may be.2.1 The importers/traders of 'brass dross/ash' either sold the said material as such, or … Officers) during enquiry relating to such material, conducted search of premises of the importer/trader, of 'Brass dross/ash' on 31-10-1987 and took possession of records of traders.2.4 They also conducted search of premises (godown), of the appellant and