Advanced Search Results

R.K. Refineries and Metal (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. General Manager, India ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2(1), 3, 11B, 11B(2) and 35; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 56A, 57 and 57A

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN18

a declaration that C.N. Dross comes under sub-heading No. 2620.00 of Chapter 26 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and it comes within the purview of exemption of Central Excise Duty in terms of Notification No. 19/88/CE

Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 37B; Customs Act - Sections 12; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3 and 3(1); Bombay Sales Tax Act; Central Excise Rules - Rules 3, 43(1) and 174

Reported in : 2001(74)ECC296; 2001(131)ELT535(Guj)

which it was clarified that 'coal-ash (cinder)' is an excisable commodity classifiable under sub-heading No. 2621.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and chargeable to appropriate rate of duty. According to the Board coal-ash (cinder) was specified in the Schedule … view of Heading 27.01 of the Schedule to the Tariff Act, prescribing 'nil' rate of duty for coal. Chapter 26 deals with ores, slag and ash while Chapter 27 deals with mineral fuels, mineral oils etc. Therefore, if

Vikram Ispat Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Smt. Shahnaz HussaIn Wife of Late Shri Nasir Hussian Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ExciseCriminal

Reported in : 2008(227)ELT61(All)

M/s Shahnaz Ayhurvedics (accused No. 1) were infact cosmetics and toilet preparations falling under Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 attracting higher rate of Central Excise Duties while the same were misdeclared as Ayurvedic Medicine' and cleared under … as the 'Rules'), which was finally approved by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise, New Delhi vide order dated 26.8.1994 for its Delhi Unit and by Assistant Commissioner, Noida vide order dated 20.12.1994 for its Noida Unit.3. Again

Hy-grade Pellets Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(153)ELT409Tri(Bang.)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378

India Ltd., Faridabad, (M/s. FIL) manufactures air-conditioning and refrigerating machinery and appliances classifiable under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.3. Assessee cleared compressors falling under tariff sub-heading 8414.10. They also cleared to its buyers separately 'fly wheel' under

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Vicco Laboratories

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Central Excises (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 118

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)453; 2008(2)CTC511; 2007(123)ECC278; 2007(149)LC278(SC); 2007(218)ELT647(SC); (2008)4MLJ1272(SC); 2007(3)SCALE481

Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (in short the 'Act') as amended by Act 40/1991.5. On 28th February, 1986, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (in short Tariff Act') was introduced, to be effective from 1st March, 1986. Under the Old Tariff Act, … 21. In term of the Tariff Act, the product was sought to be classified by the respondent under Chapter 30 sub-heading 3003.30 and the same was approved by Assistant Commissioner, Nagpur, by his order dated 6th October, … the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) but the same was withdrawn on 26th December, 1989.6. On 31st October, 1996, the Central Board of Excise issued

Crane Betel Nut Powder Works Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central E ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 11, 35E, 35G, 35G(1), 35H and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1957; Central Excise Tariff Rules - Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Customs Act - Sections 129C(3), 129D, 129D(5) and 130E; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 15(2) and 15(3A); Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2006(2)ALT523

product of the Appellant under Chapter subheading No. 2107.00 instead of sub-heading No.0801.00 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, (hereinafter referred to as Tariff Act). The Appellant's contention that their products were required to be classified under

M/S Star Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs(Imports) Raigad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to point out the tariff entries and all relevant provisions of the exemption notification. Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 deals with 'Ores, Slag and Ash Notes'. Tariff Item 2601 thereof gives the description of goods falling in

itc Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1998)(77)LC411Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu