Advanced Search Results
Raymon Glues and Chemicals and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Gujarat
Mar-17-1999
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35C(4), 35L and 37B
1999(66)ECC538; 2000(117)ELT29(Guj); (1999)3GLR2347
Central Excise Act. The respondent classified the Di-calcium phosphate manufactured by the petitioner under Chapter 28 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tariff Act') though the same is classified under Chapter 23 of the Tariff
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs C.G.O. Vs. Sonam International Shop No.9
Allahabad
Oct-07-2010
Land Acquisition
conforms with the description of goods mentioned under heading No.26.36 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 48.Under the heading No.29.36, Vitamin has been defined as under: "Vitamins are active agents, usually of complex Chemical … identity under the Customs Tariff, while the former is classifiable under Chapter 29, the latter is classifiable under Chapter 23. 18.Under Explanatory Note to HSN (Chapter 23), the characteristic feature of animal feed supplement is that they essentially
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUpper India Steel Mfg. and Engg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-04-1989
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A to 57J and 173G; Constitution of India - Article 226
1990(27)ECC228; 1990(49)ELT22(P& H)
well as that of the final products which qualified for MOD VAT Credit Scheme. Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 deals with iron and steel. Heading 73.02, in particular, deals with 'waste and scrap of iron and steel'. … was decided to omit reference to figures 72.03 in column No. 3 of the said notification.8. On September 23, 1986, the Superintendent, Central Excise, conveyed to the petitioner two assessment orders, namely, Annexures P-17 and P-18. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gujarat State Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Jul-01-2009
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rule, 1944 - Rules 9, 10, 173B, 173F, 173G and 173Q
2009(168)LC109(Delhi); 2009(241)ELT190(Del)
sulphuric acid known by the trade name 'fuming sulphuric acid',it would be worthwhile mentioning here that in the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 Oleum was explicitly mentioned along with sulphuric acid in tariff heading 2807.26. The above decisions particularly in Andhra … of such use elsewhere than in the factory of production, of sulphuric acid, the procedure set out in Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules was followed.3. The petitioner, a public sector agency of the State of … cleared 13.557 MT of Oleum which was excisable to the extent of 23% in terms of TI 14G without correctly following the provisions of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadura Coats Private Limited Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Central ...
Chennai
Apr-24-2012
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Section 35F, 11BB, 87(c), Chapters 52, 54, 55, 59; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35C(2A); Constitution of India - Article 226, 32, 142; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 9-C, 9-A(1); Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 18 and 20
Spun Polyester) multiple folded yarn falling under Chapters 52, 54, 55, respectively of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It is also a Star Trading House and has paid crores in tax to the Government.(ii) There were … manufacture of cotton yarn, core spun yarn and 100% SSP (Staple Spun Polyester) multiple folded yarn falling under Chapters 52, 54, 55, respectively of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It is also … were passed by the respondent through Orders No.92/2011 dated 22.11.2011, No.93/2011 dated 23.11.2011, No.94/2011 dated 24.11.2011, No.95/2011 dated 24.11.2011. In the meanwhile, the petitioner filed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Newsprint Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-30-1999
Excise
(2003)(162)ELT1125TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-21-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)(83)ELT49TriDel
is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles … that the appellants manufactured forgings and forged articles of motor vehicle parts; that under Notn. No. 223/88, dated 23-6-1988 as amended, forgings and forged articles of steel (other than stainless steel) falling under any heading or sub-heading
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMayil Mark Nilayam Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise
Chennai
Feb-23-2000
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6, 9(1), 11A, 12, 14, 42(1), 43, 43(1) and 174; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1980; Customs Act; Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 226; Central Excise Rules, 1994 - Rules 9(1), 52A, 173B, 173B(1), 174 and 206(3)
2001(127)ELT659(Mad)
goods falling under sub heading Nos. 3307.90 and 3402.90 in Chapter Nos. 33 and 31 respectively of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.2. This court admitted the writ petition on 29-8-1998. The respondents have been served and the respondents have also … the premises to submit an explanation and requested to postpone the appearance. There has been no reply. On 23-1-1998, the officials of the Directorate General of Anti- Evasion, Central Excise took the petitioner to their office at
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kitply Industries Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-23-2002
Excise
(2002)(84)ECC851
classifiable under chapter heading 44.08. For this purpose they relied on Note 5 of Chapter 44 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 which read as under :- "For the purpose of heading No. 44.08 the expression "similar laminated wood" includes … the case of Collector of Central Excise, Shillong v. Wood Craft Products Ltd., reported in 1995 (77) E.L.T. 23 (S.C.) in Para 16 observed as under - "16. The significant words are "plywood", "veneered panels" and "lami
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShantilal Doshi Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-27-1991
Excise
(1991)LC397Tri(Delhi)
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »