Advanced Search Results

The Commissioner of Central ] Excise and Custom, Daman, Vs. M/S. Gujch ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 53, 223B, 9(2); Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 34,6

various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing modvat facility under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (herein after for … stated thus :The Respondents herein are engaged in manufacture of various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing

M/S Pure Drinks Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapter 22; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A(1), 57F(5)

before us at the relevant point in time manufactured aerated water which fell under chapter 22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the „said Act) at the relevant point in time. For the purposes of its

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Shriram Ssk Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)LC614Tri(Delhi)

of Chapter note 2(b) of Chapter 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, Ethyl Alcohol stood excluded from Chapter 22 of the Act. Ld. Counsel for Respondents had further submitted that Ethyl Alcohol, being a product of fermentation … the Respondents. He submitted that during the period under dispute, i.e., upto 28-2-1990 after the introduction of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, there was no specific Tariff entry for the type of Ethyl Alcohol manufactured by the Respondents. In view

Puma Ayurvedic Herbal (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Central Excise, Nagpu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Central Excise Act

Reported in : AIR2006SC1561; 2006(196)ELT3(SC); JT2006(3)SC354; 2006(3)SCALE141; (2006)3SCC266; [2006]145STC200(SC)

of medicaments or cosmetics. Answer to this question determines as to whether the goods are classifiable under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as cosmetics under Chapter 33 or as medicaments under Chapter 30. As cosmetics the rate of excise duty … RESTORATION OF LANDS TO THE SCHEDULED TRIBES ACT, 1999 (12 OF 1999) Sections 5(1), 92), 6, 19 & 22: [S.B. Sinha & M.K. Sharma] Constitutionality and legislative competence in relation to Article 300-A, Schedule VII, List II,

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Ishaan Research Lab (P) Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 4(4), 11A and 11A(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3 and 4; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules - Rules 9(2), 173Q and 209A

Reported in : 2008(230)ELT7(SC); JT2008(10)SC1; 2008(12)SCALE270; 2008AIRSCW6235; 2008(6)Supreme558

or mis-statement. Charge of suppression is not sustainable. Proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Act is not applicable. CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT, 1985. Chapter 33, Heading 33-04, sub-heading 3304 & Heading 33.05; Chapter 30, Heading 33.03; Sub-heading 3003.19 : Medicament or cosmetic … court found that the use of the word 'subsidiary' in the said note, i.e., Note No. 2 of Chapter 22 was overlooked by the Revenue. It was also held that Revenue had failed to make any case in

M/S. Kemwll Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(75)ECC764

last heading will have to be applied and the products would be classified under heading 29.36 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. (iv) The case of M/s Glaxo India Ltd., & Tribunal decision thereon was being contested by the department … therefore, the proviso to Section 11A was rightly invoked. (ii) Products have a predominant mixture of vitamin and chapter 23.02 covers only products which can be traced to animal or vegetable origin and not synthetic preparations. (iii) … Forte and approved 25.05.942. Classification List 2/94-95 for Vimeral and Vitablend approved. 22.08.943. Appeals No.372/95 and 373/95 filed by Dept. 01.08.954. Commissioner Appeals dismisses appeal

Commnr. of Central Excise, T.N. Vs. Vinayaga Body Building Indus. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Finance Act, 2003; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(22); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules - Rule 4(1)

Reported in : 2008(126)ECC91; 2008(152)LC91(SC); 2008(224)ELT3(SC); JT2008(3)SC447; 2008(3)SCALE464; (2008)3SCC666; 2008AIRSCW1981; 2008(4)KCCRSN261

to whether a maxi cab should be classified under the respective tariff heads, i.e., 87.02 to 87.05 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or under the Chapter Heading 87.07?15. Indisputably, again NCCD was imposed at the rate of one per cent … the respondent is the question involved in this appeal, which arises out of a judgment and order dated 22.09.2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai in Appeal No. E/616

Adhunik Food Products (P) Ltd., U.P. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1)

Reported in : 2007(117)ECC296; 2007LC296(SC); 2007(211)ELT360(SC); JT2007(8)SC338; 2007(6)SCALE22; (2007)9SCC32; 2007(1)LC605(SC)

of the Table hereto annexed and falling under the Chapter or sub-heading No. of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said Table, from so much … Exemption No.84 vide Notification No.2/1994.GENERAL EXEMPTION NO.83Effective rate of duty for certain specified goods of Chapters 4 to 22In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 5A of the Central Excises and Salt Act,

Rajasthan Spg. and Wvg. Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 49; Central Excise Rules - Rule 9(1)

Reported in : AIR2003SC1162; 2003(85)ECC710; 2003(152)ELT32(SC); JT2003(1)SC510; 2003(1)SCALE548; (2003)2SCC436

the appellants.8. Following the said judgments of this Court in Bhilwara and Banswara (supra), these appeals are dismissed. Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 Chapter 55 -Tariff headings 18-III/18-E/22- Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 49 - Central Excise Rules, 1944- Rule 9(1)

Srf Limited and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1998)(61)ECC687

18 The nomenclature, construction and use of the fabrics have already been declared to the Department. When the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 was brought into force, the proposed classification was called for by the department. The appellants declared to the … list filed in January, 1984, the classification was claimed under Tariff Item 22 describing the nature of the fabric as chafer fabrics, filter fabrics, luggage … of unprocessed fabrics of cotton and man-made fibre and filament yarn. The appellants claim the . classification under Chapter 52, 54 or 55 depending upon the material used for the fabric while revenue seeks the classification under