Advanced Search Results
Bamni Proteins Limited Vs. Ajay (Shri)
Mumbai
Sep-21-2000
Contempt of CourtExcise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2
2001(2)BomCR744
to why the Di-Calcium Phosphate (Animal Feed Grade) should not be classified under Chapter Sub-heading No. 2835.00 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, attracting Central Excise Duty @ 6 per cent ad valorem and why the Central Excise Duty to the … Counsel for the respondent.2. The contempt petition is preferred by the petitioner for violation of the order dated 23-8-1999, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1159 of 1999.3. The learned Counsel
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdhunik Food Products (P) Ltd., U.P. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excis ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-20-2007
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1)
2007(117)ECC296; 2007LC296(SC); 2007(211)ELT360(SC); JT2007(8)SC338; 2007(6)SCALE22; (2007)9SCC32; 2007(1)LC605(SC)
of the Table hereto annexed and falling under the Chapter or sub-heading No. of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said Table, from so much
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Central ] Excise and Custom, Daman, Vs. M/S. Gujch ...
Mumbai
Dec-16-2010
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 53, 223B, 9(2); Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 34,6
various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing modvat facility under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (herein after for … stated thus :The Respondents herein are engaged in manufacture of various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing … filed by the Revenue against the Judgment and Order dated 13th January 2004 passed by the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai raises
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi Vs. Hari Chand Shri Gopa ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-03-2005
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 9, 47, 49A(1), 52A, 54, 57G, 57T, 173B, 173B(1), 173FF, 173G, 173G(1), 173G(3), 173K, 174, 174(1), 174A, 192, 196, 196(1) and 224(1); ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 11A and 14; ;Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1); ;Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 233B; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 116 and 161
AIR2005SC3595; 2005(102)ECC481; 2005(188)ELT353(SC); JT2005(12)SC189; 2005(8)SCALE58; (2005)8SCC164
judgment in civil appeal nos.5747-5749 of 2000 that this kimam was excisable and classifiable under sub-heading 2404.49/2404.40 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Admittedly, the existence of assessees' units in Delhi, where kimam was manufactured, was not disclosed to the department, … law involved in this matter is - whether irrespective of the assessees having not followed or substantially followed Chapter X procedure under the Central Excise Rules, 1944, they would still be entitled to the benefit of notification … given when intended use of material can be established by other evidence. 2. This case is a sequel to the case of the assessees in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-05-1997
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 5A
AIR1997SC1176; 1997(92)ELT294(SC); JT1997(3)SC282; 1997(2)SCALE481; (1997)3SCC515; [1997]2SCR718
the manufacture of Ethylene, Propylene, Benzene, Toluene and other products falling under Chapters 27 and 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.2. At the material time the appellant obtained raw naphtha from the Refinery in terms of Notification No. 27/89-C.E. … appellant is engaged, inter alia, in the manufacture of Ethylene, Propylene, Benzene, Toluene and other products falling under Chapters 27 and 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.2. At the material time the appellant obtained raw
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWipro Ltd. and Panchajanya Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-06-2000
Service Tax
(2000)(71)ECC326
(c) that bathing bars (soaps containing less than 60% TFM merit classification under Chapter sub-heading 3307.39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; (d) and that as per the Quality Control reports of the appellants the said 'Santoor Soaps' contain TFM … Controller (India), Directorate of Health Services, New Delhi, the soap manufacturers should adhere to BIS Standard No. IS 2888:1983and no toilet soap containing less than 60% FM (Total Fatty Matter) should be marketed and further that bathing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askitc Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-16-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)(77)LC411Tri(Chennai)
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBorax Morarji Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jun-21-2004
Excise
(2004)(97)ECC421
of Central Excise Act respectively.2. The appellants manufacture excisable goods falling under Chapter heading 28, 29 & 39 Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. The dispute pertains to a product called 'AGRIBOR' which was classified by the appellants as 'other fertilizer' falling
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharampal Satyapal Limited Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer,
Chennai
Apr-13-2009
ExciseSales Tax/VAT
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3A, 3B, 3(2) and 8; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 14 and 15; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957; Finance Act, 1996; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Administrative Act; Finance Act, 1995; Finance Act, 2001; Central Excise Act; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; State Sales Tax Act - Sections 8; Delhi Sales Tax Act; Minimum Wages Act; Orissa Sales Tax Act; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 286 and 286(3)
2009(243)ELT179(Mad); (2009)24VST193(Mad)
with the product description in the CET Act with effect from 16.3.1988. By Finance Act 2 of 1996, Chapter Heading 2404 of the Central Excise Tariff Act was re-cast and substituted, and chewing tobacco preparations earlier covered … it occurs after Heading 21.06. The petitioners were originally paying excise duty on these goods as per the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('CET Act' in short) under Heading 21.06 upto 9.10.2000 and thereafter, they are paying central excise duty and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommnr.of Central Excise, ... Vs. M/S. TarpaulIn International
Supreme Court of India
Aug-04-2010
Central Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Schedule 63.01 , Section 2(f), 11, 5(e), 3, 2(d), 2(f)(ii), Chapter 63, 63.01;
cutting, stitching and fixing of eye-lets amounts to manufacture and, hence, they are exigible to duty under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (for short `the Act').3) A show cause notice was issued by a competent authority dated 31.8.1995, inter alia … 31.8.1995, inter alia directing the noticee to show cause as to why tarpaulin made-ups be not classified under chapter sub-heading 63.01 and the corresponding duty of Rs.57,33,262/- be demanded. The assessees had filed their replies inter alia … as follows: we take M/s Tarpaulin International Civil Appeal No. 5341 of 2005 as the lead case. The noticee is carrying on the business of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »