Advanced Search Results
Corn Products Co. India Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Sep-18-1990
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8 and 8(1)
1991(51)ELT330(Bom)
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The Central Government in exercise of powers under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 published exemption notification dated March 1, 1975 providing that goods of description specified in the schedule and falling
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Allahabad
Aug-06-1991
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1) and 10; Constitution of India - Article 226
1994(46)ECC161; 1992(58)ELT475(All)
assessee's factory -- Production during corresponding period as defined in explanation to notification -- Eligible for rebate -- Central Excise Rules, 1944, Rule 8(1). - - The petitioner's contention is that the petitioner's factory did work in the preceding base period,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. S. Pannadevi Vs. Govt. of India
Chennai
Apr-06-1990
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
1991(32)ECC1; 1991(52)ELT347(Mad)
the Notification No. 73/81-C.E., dated 25-3-1981, being a notification issued under sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 amending an earlier Notification 80/80-C.E., dated 19-6-1980 and therefore, I am passing a common order in the above
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hiralal Panachand Shah Vs. N.L. Mehta and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-14-1957
ConstitutionExcise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1), 159(2) and 213; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 245; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 35; Indian Legislature Act, 1869 - Sections 9
AIR1959Bom256; (1958)60BOMLR991
owns a ware-house and holds the requisite licences under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, and the Central Excise Rules. 1944 in connection with the said warehouse. On 9-6-1956, the petitioner submitted to the Range Officer, Central Tobacco Warehouse, … Schedule. In exercise of the powers conferred on the Central Government the Central Government has framed rules. Under Rule 8 of the rules so framed it is provided as under: '8(1) The Central Government from time to time
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGtc Industries Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Aug-11-1986
Excise
Companies Act, 1956; Standard of Weights and Measures Act, 1976; Standard of Weights and Measures (Packed Commodities) Rules, 1977; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4, 12 and 37; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1) and 8(3); Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226
1987(11)ECC33; 1989(23)LC239(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT925(Bom)
Central Government by Sections 6, 12 and 37, the Central Government has made rules which are called the Central Excise Rules, 1944, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'. Rule 8 of these Rules has obviously been made in exercise of … rule in so far as it is relevant for the purpose of this petition. It is as follows :-'8. (1) Central Government may, from time to time, by notification in the Official Gazette, exempt, subject to such conditions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskE. Septon and Company Private Limited Vs. Superintendent of Central Ex ...
Allahabad
Sep-27-1984
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8, 8(1), 174 and 174A
1985(5)ECC305; 1985(19)ELT57(All)
the Additional Standing Counsel for the Union of India, appearing for the respondents. Under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) the Central Government has power to exempt any excisable goods from the … the Ice Factory. The woollen and shoddy yarns manufactured by the petitioner company fall under Tariff Items No. 18(B) and 18(B)(1) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-10-2004
Excise
Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1) and 39; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 9(1), 52, 52A, 209 and 210; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 67 and 83; Standard Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 23(2), 23(6) and 39; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10 and 115J; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18A(6), 18A(8) and 24(2); Central Excise Law; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(1); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948; Customs Act, 1902; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 12(1); Customs Act, 1962; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act; Mo
2004(96)ECC97; 2004(171)ELT433(SC); JT2004(7)SC409; 2004(7)SCALE540; (2004)7SCC591
Notification No. 201/85 dated 2.9.1985 (referred to hereafter as 'the 1985 Notification') issued under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (referred to as the 'Rules') and Section 3(3) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. J.K. Industries Ltd.
Rajasthan
Sep-11-1989
Constitution
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8 and 8(1)
AIR1991Raj45; 1991LC284(Rajasthan); 1990(49)ELT512(Raj); 1990(1)WLN675
6-4-1984. This was in exercise of the power conferred on the Central Government under Section 8(l) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, which rule was enacted under Section 37 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It was submitted … 1. This special appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 is directed against the Judgment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCuddapah Co-operative Sugars Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-28-1988
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1) and 11
1989(23)LC316(AP); 1988(38)ELT257(AP)
Matched in: Advocate K. Srinivasamurthy, Adv. K. Jagannatha Rao, Standing Counsel for the Central Government
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Sunder U. Nichani Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex. and Customs
Karnataka
Dec-05-1990
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1), 10, 10A, 73B, 173-A and 173B; Central Excise Act - Sections 11A
1991(33)ECC246; 1991(56)ELT5(Kar)
Matched in: Advocate Shri G. Chandra Kumar, Adv. Shri Ashok Harnahalli, Central Govt. Standing Counsel
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »