Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56A and 57G

Reported in : 2008(125)ECC123; 2008(151)LC123(Madras); 2008(227)ELT361(Mad)

assessee who have not followed a procedure and have not filed any declaration under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944?2. The assessee engaged in the manufacture of Drip Irrigation System claimed exemption in respect of the HDPE/LDPE pipes

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kumar Steels

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35E(4), 35G(1) and 35G(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57F(2), 57F(3), 57G, 57G(1) and 57G(2)

Reported in : 2000(68)ECC547; 2000(116)ELT15(Del)

allegation that the respondent-assessee had not filed a declaration under Rule 57G read with Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, a show cause notice was issued to it for wrongly availing and utilising Modified Value Added Tax (for

Sood Steel India (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1998)(100)ELT369TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Medopharma Vs. Supdt. of Central Excise, Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 52A, 57A, 57G, (2) and (4), 57H, 57-I and 173Q; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 1994(70)ELT505(Mad)

(I) Private Limited, represented by its Director, for a Declaration to declare first proviso to Rule 57G(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944, as unconstitutional. W.P. No. 9674 of 1989 has been filed by Medopharm, a partnership firm, for a mandamus

Saraya Distillary Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals)

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A, 57G, 57G(1) and 57G(5)

Reported in : 2001(73)ECC67; 2000LC457(Allahabad); 2001(127)ELT326(All)

alcohol was imposed with effect from 1-3-1994. In view of the provisions contained in Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for availing the facility of Modvat credit, the petitioner filed the declaration on 22-7-1994. An application dated 27-8-1994

East India Pharmaceutical Works Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(154)ELT527Tri(Kol.)kata

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

i.T.C. Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57G(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2004(93)ECC569

Matched in: Advocate Sriram Panchu, Senior counsel for ;T. Mohan, Adv. K. Veeraraghavan, Senior Central Govt. Standing Counsel

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57G, 57G(1) and 57G(2); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G

Reported in : 2004(174)ELT427(Raj)

order dated 14-2-2003.'Whether Modvat credit is available on endorsed invoice, under the provisions of erstwhile Rule 57G of Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Notification No. 15/94-C.E. (NT,), dated 30th March, 1994'.2. The facts giving rise to this application are

Comm. of Central Excise and Customs Vs. Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 35G; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Medicinal Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(3) and 19(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57B, 57G, 57I and 173Q; Medicinal Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 - Rule 12; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2009(169)LC71(Gujarat)

not exceed 90% of the duty paid. An analogy can also be drawn from the provisions contained in Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules which prescribes the time limit of six months. In any case, no prejudice … Form L-4 bearing No. ADI/AW/2/70 and working under self removal procedure prescribed under Chapter No. VIIA of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.3. The respondent Company is availing the benefit of credit of central excise duty on inputs used in the

Commissioner of C. Ex., Chandigarh-i Vs. Baij Nath Ashrafi Lal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rule, 1944 - Rules 52A and 57G; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35(H)(1)

Reported in : 2002(79)ECC765; 2002(139)ELT511(P& H)

which are not specified documents, as prescribed under provisions of Rule 52A read with Rule 57G/57T of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, for taking Modvat credit?'2. Respondent No. 1 is engaged in the manufacture of proofing compound, tents, tarpaulins, candles