Advanced Search Results

Castrol India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57AF(1) and 57AF(2)

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR431; 2003(154)ELT19(Bom)

be nottaken against them for availing Cenvat Credit of Rs. 21,74,227.00 in contravention of Rule 57AF(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 ('Excise Rules' for short). The Petitioners had availed the Cenvat Credit for the aforesaid amount pursuant to the

India Jute and Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)(33)ECC188

manufacturers for goods removed for export under B-l Bond as provided under Rules 12 and 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appellants had urged in their appeals before the East Regional Bench, Calcutta, that Rules 3 and 4 … levy of cess on the Jute manufacturers for goods removed for export under B-l Bond as provided under Rules 12 and 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appellants had urged in their appeals before the … case in Appeal No. 16/87-ERB as detailed in Order-in-Original No. 17/TI-18D/Demand/84 dated 25-07-1986 : 8. The appellants - M/s. India Jute & Industries Ltd., Serampore,

Prakash Cotton Mills Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. B.N. Rangwani and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 7, 9(2), 10, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 52-A, 53, 54, 55, 56 and 210; Central Excise Act - Sections 2, 6, 9 and 33

Reported in : AIR1971Bom386; (1971)73BOMLR225; 1971MhLJ566

as to costs.22. Order accordingly. Central Excises and Salt. Act (I of 1944), Sections 6, 9, 33 - Central Excise Rules, 1944. Rule 9--Whether inquiry held under Rule 9(2) a quasi-judicial inquiry--Applicability of rules of natural justice to such inquiry.;The inquiry

Asia Tobacco Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 2, 4, 5, 9(1), 9(2), 52, 52A, 52A(5) and 209; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A, 37 and 37(2)

Reported in : 1988(16)ECC62; 1988(33)ELT279(Mad)

Matched in: Advocate Habibullah Badsha, Adv. for S. Subramaniam and ;R. Sashidharan, Advs. Adv. General for A.P. Suryaprakasam, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel

Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. Vs. Supdt. of C. Ex. and Customs

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 4 and 4(4); ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 56A, 56A(2) and 56A(3)

Reported in : 1989(42)ELT562(Cal)

is alleged to be duly licensed under the provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act and/or the Central Excise Rules, 1944. It is further stated that different types of papers are subjected to different rates of duty under the … application to the Assistant Collector of Central Excise by letter dated January 26,1978 for long day to avail the benefit or for proforma credit under … Susanta Chatterji, J.1. The present Rule was obtained by the writ petitioner challenging the Order No. V(30)-5-SBP-C.EX.-78/2629 dated February 15,1978 and the order dated

Ponds (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56A, 57A, 57C, 57D(2), 57F, 57F(2) and 57N; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 35G(1) and 35G(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 1993(42)ECC291; 1993(63)ELT3(Mad); (1993)IMLJ355

the new section or heading 'AA. Credit of duty paid on excisable goods used as inputs' to the Central Excise Rules, 1944. It is a modification or improvement of the pre-existing proforma credit scheme. Hence it is known as Modified … Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), Sch., Chapter 33, Note 4.;Words and Phrases - Central excise--'Intermediate product', meaning of--Central Excise Rules 1944, Rule 57-D(2), proviso.;Words and Phrases - Central excise--'Manufacture', meaning of--Central Excises and Salt Act (1 of 1944), Section 2(f)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi Vs. Kraftech Products Inc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4A, 11A, 11A(1), 11AA, 11AB, 34 and 83; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Act, 1976; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6, 6(1), 12, 12(2), 17, 17(1), 25 and 34; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q; Central Excise (No.2) Rules, 2001 - Rule 25

Reported in : AIR2008SC2238; 2008(127)ECC21; 2008(153)LC21(SC); 2008(224)ELT504(SC); JT2008(4)SC335; 2008(4)SCALE528; 2008AIRSCW3218; JT2008(4)SC335.

of Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.(ii) Penalty should not be imposed under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules 1944/now Rule 25 of the Central Excise (No.2) Rules, 2001.(iii) Interest due under Section 11AA/11AB of the Act,

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kumar Steels

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35E(4), 35G(1) and 35G(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57F(2), 57F(3), 57G, 57G(1) and 57G(2)

Reported in : 2000(68)ECC547; 2000(116)ELT15(Del)

allegation that the respondent-assessee had not filed a declaration under Rule 57G read with Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, a show cause notice was issued to it for wrongly availing and utilising Modified Value Added Tax (for

V.K. Thampi Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Kerala

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(2), 173Q, 52(A), 226 and 233A,

Reported in : 1996(87)ELT610(Ker)

circumstances of the case, is not the order under appeal bad for non-compliance with Rule 233A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 by which a duty is cast on the respondent to afford the person proceeded against, a reasonable opportunity … and in the circumstances of the case, is not the order under appeal bad for non-compliance with Rule 233A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 by which a duty is cast on the respondent to afford the

Provash Kumar Dey Vs. Inspector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 36; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 32(1), 32(2), 39 and 40

Reported in : 1988(15)ECC310,1987(31)ELT13(Cal)

the petitioner alleging that the petitioner had contravened the provisions of Rules 32(1), 39 and 40 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 inasmuch as the prescribed account was hot written upto date resulting in variation of the stock actually found … Central Excise Licence had to be obtained by him.3. In accordance with the provisions of the Central Excise Rules the petitioner purchases and transports tobacco under proper permits called T.P.1's and the tobacco so purchased and transported … of the petitioner at No. 1094, Bagula Bazar, District Nadia.4. On April 29, 1974 some officers of Central Excise Department visited the aforesaid licensed premises