Advanced Search Results

Kesoram Cements, Basantnagar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 11 and 173J; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11B, 11B(1) and 40

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT214(AP)

Matched in: Advocate K. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv. K. Subrahmanya Reddy, Standing-Counsel for Central Government

Poulose and Matthen Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1989)(43)ELT424TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

U Foam Private Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 11

Reported in : 1989(20)ECC133; 1988(36)ELT551(AP); [1989]175ITR326(AP)

below : 'GSR : In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government hereby exempts articles made of polyurethane foam, falling under sub-item (4) of item No. 15A … referred for the consideration of this court is : 'In the facts and circumstances of the case, whether rule 11 of the Central Excises Rules, 1944, as it existed prior to the introduction of section 11B in the

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Peria Karamalai Tea and Produce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1986)(27)ELT362TriDel

the respondent's refund claim by the jurisdictional superintendent of Central Excise, when Rule 11 (as amended) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, under which the refund claim was made, read, at the material time of the case, that such application

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Kanoria Chemicals and Industries

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1986)(6)LC223Tri(Delhi)

claims on the ground that they were hit by the limitation laid down in Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (hereafter called 'the Rules') since they were not submitted within 6 months of the payment of duty. The

Collector or Central Excise Vs. Asiatic Oxygen Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1986)LC508Tri(Chennai)

time limit of six months from the date of payment of duty, as contemplated under Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules, 1944? 3. Whether the Tribunal having been constituted under the Act was correct in law in granting refund otherwise

N.S. Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1989(20)LC471(Bombay)

May 1977. This refund application was granted to the petitioners under the provisions of Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. It has not been contended by the respondents that the padding solutions manufactured by the petitioners did not

Cuddapah Co-operative Sugars Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1) and 11

Reported in : 1989(23)LC316(AP); 1988(38)ELT257(AP)

Matched in: Advocate K. Srinivasamurthy, Adv. K. Jagannatha Rao, Standing Counsel for the Central Government

Coastal Gases and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Centr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 11B; Central Excises Rules - Rules 9B, 9B(5) and 11

Reported in : 1997(92)ELT460(SC); JT1997(10)SC679; (1997)7SCC223

for refund was rejected as time barred by the Assistant Collector in view of Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On an appeal, the Collector (Appeals) by his order dated 4th August, 1981 upheld the order of the

Andhra Fertilisers Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 11 and 52

Reported in : 1980(6)ELT16(AP)

2. The clam made in the writ petition is resisted by the Collector of Central Excise because under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules 1944, such a claim is barred : because the refund under the rules … disputes arose, the Government of India in their order on November 22, 1971 held 'Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 prescribed that duty of excise is to be collected at the time of removal of excisable goods from