Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise act sections 35g · Page 1 of about 601 results (0.043 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 19 2008

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Shree Rubber Plast Co. Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2008

Subject : ExciseLimitation

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G and 35G(9); Limitation Act 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 130; Rent Act - Sections 13(4) and 18; Limitation Act, 1908; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Income Tax Act - Sections 260A

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR53; 2009(111)BomLR585; (2009)221CTR(Bom)652; 2009(234)ELT33(Bom); [2009]16STJ355; [2009]20STT9

whether this Court is empowered to condone the delay in filing the Appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 which are filed beyond the prescribed period of 180 days.2. One Division Bench in the case of … limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special or local law, the provisions contained in Sections 4 - 24 (inclusive) shall apply only insofar as, and to the extent to which, they are not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2001

P. Vasu Babu Vs. Cegat, Chennai

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-27-2001

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G and 35H; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(142)ELT316(AP)

Matched in: Advocate Srinivasa Varada Chary K., Adv. L. Narasimba Reddy, SC for Central Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2004

Ankur Steels Kurouli Vs. Cegat and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G(3)

Reported in : 2005(100)ECC516; 2005(188)ELT367(All)

paid.4. The Assistant Commissioner dropped the proceedings but the department reviewed the order under Section 35E(2) of the Central Excise Act, and the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the deemed credit was not available on the ground that Railway Scrap … ORDERM. Katju, J. 1. This is a reference under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 in which the following questions have been referred to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 08 2005

Bombay Snuff P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G, 35G(3) and 36; Income Tax Act; Customs Act; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 125(2005)DLT605; 2006(86)DRJ300; 2006(194)ELT264(Del)

An objection, touching the territorial jurisdiction of this Court to entertain this appeal under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, has been raised by the respondents on the threshold. The appeal, should according to the respondents, have … T.S. Thakur, J.1. An objection, touching the territorial jurisdiction of this Court to entertain this appeal under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, has been raised by the respondents on the threshold. The appeal,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2004

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mil India Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G

Reported in : 2005(98)ECC709; 2008(222)ELT497(All)

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. In the present appeal filed under Section 35G of Central Excise, Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida, has raised the following four … R.K. Agrawal, J.1. In the present appeal filed under Section 35G of Central Excise, Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2001

Nagpal Steels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-31-2001

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G(3)

Reported in : 2001(78)ECC338; 2002(144)ELT46(P& H)

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. These are two petitions under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Company and its Director are the petitioners. They pray that the Appellate Tribunal be directed to … Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. These are two petitions under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Company and its Director are the petitioners. They pray that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2009

Commi. of Central Excise and Customs Vs. Shree Pramukh Switchgear

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-15-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G(1); Central Excise Rules - Rules 52A and 57A

Reported in : 2009(170)LC87(Gujarat)

by the Customs, Excise Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal West Regional Bench at Mumbai under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.Whether modvat credit is admissible on the gate passes endorsed after 1.4.94 and whether the notification No. 16/94-CE/NT … law has been referred by the Customs, Excise Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal West Regional Bench at Mumbai under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.Whether modvat credit is admissible on the gate passes endorsed after 1.4.94

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2011

Orange City Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of Central ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-12-2011

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act 1944 - Section 35G; Central Excise Rules 1944 - Rule 173E

1. These Appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act 1944 are directed against a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated … 1. These Appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act 1944 are directed against a common order of the Customs, Excise and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2001

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Klockner Supreme Pentaplast Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-10-2001

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G

Reported in : 2002(79)ECC437; 2002(140)ELT370(MP)

heard on merits.3. This is an application moved by the Union of India under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short), against an order passed by the Central Excise & … With consent arguments were heard on merits.3. This is an application moved by the Union of India under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short), against an order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1987

Collector of Central Excise Vs. President, Customs, Excise and Gold (C ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-1987

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G(1) and 35G(3); Customs Act - Sections 129C(5)

Reported in : 1987(12)ECC113; 1987(32)ELT642(All)

exemption which was not admissible. The proceedings were contested by the respondent No. 2. Ultimately the Assistant Collector, Central Excise decided the dispute against the respondent No. 2 vide its order dated 10.2.1983. Against the aforesaid order an … was thereafter that the Collector, Central Excise moved an application under Section 35G(1) of the Act in the case of respondent No. 2 for making … of excisable goods falling under Tariff Item No. 68 under the provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Government of India issued a notification dated 18.6.1977 through which it exempted goods from payment of … be made to the larger Bench, the Tribunal referred the same under Section 129C, Sub-section (5) of the Customs Act (sic) to the Larger Bench.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial