Advanced Search Results
Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Jul-25-1990
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2)
1990(50)ELT500(Bom)
costs. Excise - notification - Rule 8 (1) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Section 36 (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - Central Government exempted vegetable product under item No. 13 of Schedule 1 of Act in exercise of … He accordingly allowed the appeal by his order dated June 17, 1978.5. In exercise of the powers under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the Additional Secretary to the Government of India issued
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStar Paper Mills Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Feb-06-1981
Excise
Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2)
1981(8)ELT577(Del); ILR1981Delhi600
duty livable in respect of the wrapping paper. (3) Soon after excise duty on paper was introduced the Central Excise Collector at Allahabad passed a standing order in pursuance of the instructions of the Central Board of Indirect … dated 23rd July, 1973 issued by the second respondent under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and finally an order of the second respondent dated 25th July, 1975 passed under the above section. The … a notice dated 23rd July, 1973 issued by the second respondent under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and finally an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGufic Laboratories and Three Others Vs. Union of India and Three Other ...
Mumbai
Dec-07-1983
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2)
1989(23)LC473(Bombay); 1984(17)ELT27(Bom); [1983]140ITR158a(Bom)
the case there will be no order as to costs. Excise - duty - Section 36 (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - petitioners manufactured analgin injections - Order passed holding that petitioners liable to pay duty under Tariff Item … notice for reviewing the order of the Appellate Collector, on the petitioners, in exercise of the powers under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and by order dated July 30, 1979, it was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Roplas (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Sep-04-1991
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2)
1991(56)ELT511(Bom)
15. Certified copy to be issued on priority basis. Excise - steel furniture - Section 36 (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - petitioners were manufacturer of special trolleys to be used in aircrafts - whether such trolleys covered under … to the petitioners that the appellate order was under review. On 30th July, 1980, a review notice under Section 36(2) of the said Act was received by the petitioners and after filing its reply and on personal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Metal Industries Vs. R.B. Said and Others
Mumbai
Nov-29-1983
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 10, 173B and 173J; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2)
1984(16)ELT37(Bom)
- Rules 8 (1), 10, 173B and 173J of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Section 36 (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - notification issued exempting manufacture of aluminum strips by aluminum in crude form - petitioners manufactured aluminum from … of the revision application, the Government of India had also commenced suo moto proceedings under Sub-section (2) of Section 36 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and on considering the reply of the petitioners, modified
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavji Industrial Corporation Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Sep-11-1981
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2)
1989(24)LC520(Bombay); 1981(8)ELT734(Bom)
authorities. Excise - exemption - Rule 8 (1) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Section 36 (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - whether corrugated roofing constituted 'sheets' being disqualified for exemption based on notification - petitioners made no efforts … of reviewing the order passed by the Appellate Collector. The Central Government decided to exercise the powers under Section 36(2) of the Central Excise Act as it was felt that the Appellate Collector had completely missed the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskReichhold Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Government of India and ors.
Chennai
Aug-16-1983
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11-A and 36(2); Central Excise Rules - Rule 9(2)
1984(3)ECC58; 1984(16)ELT228(Mad)
Matched in: Advocate S.A. Sundaram, Adv. for King and Patridge T. Somasundaram, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSimmonds Marshal Ltd. Vs. M.R. Baralikar, Assistant Collector of Centr ...
Mumbai
Mar-26-1984
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2)
1984(2)BomCR602; 1984(2)ECC42; 1989(20)LC321(Bombay); 1985(22)ELT378(Bom)
this Court in Misc. Petition No. 944 of 1973 - Duke and Sons Ltd. v. G.T. Kundnani, Superintendent, Central Excise decided by Rege, J., on 8/11th October, 1976. In the said decision Rege, J., held that the demand … show cause notice was issued by the Central Government under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioners submitted their reply to the said show cause notice and also forwarded various enclosures, including the … 1977, a show cause notice was issued by the Central Government under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioners submitted … it is by now well-settled that the articles referred to in an entry of the Schedule to the Excise Act have to be understood in the popular sense, that is to say, in the sense in which the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCorn Products Co. India Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Sep-18-1990
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8 and 8(1)
1991(51)ELT330(Bom)
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The Central Government in exercise of powers under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 published exemption notification dated March 1, 1975 providing that goods of description specified in the schedule … from payment of excise duty.The Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, served notice under Section 36(2) of the Act on the company to show cause why the order of the Appellate authority should not … Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, served notice under Section 36(2) of the Act on the company to show cause why the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPatel Prabhudas Purshottamdas Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Dec-05-1981
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11A, 35, 35A, 36 and 36(2)
1982(10)ELT112(Bom)
Rule 10 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Sections 4, 11A, 35, 35A, 36 and 36 (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - whether post manufacturing charges recovered by petitioners to be included in assessable value of their goods -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »