Advanced Search Results
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Cegat
Delhi
May-18-1994
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 9(2), 173B, 173C and 173Q(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 11A(1)
1994(73)ELT776(Del)
Central Excise Rules, 1944 falling under Item No. 68 of First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 from so much of the duty livable as is in excess of the amount calculated at the rates … It gave a reply dated 21-3-1991 and on that basis the Collector passed an order on 17-12-1991 demanding Central Excise duty in a sum of Rs. 4,46,99,520.40 from the O.N.G.C., Hazira, Surat under Rule 9(2) of the Central … the order. 2. The O.N.G.C. was issued a show cause notice under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act on 25-1-1991 after 3
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDavanagere Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Chairman C.B.E. and C.
Karnataka
Mar-25-1991
Excise
Central Excise Rules - Rules 9, 47, 49 and 173-I; Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 51; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A(1) and (2)
1993LC80(Karnataka); 1991(55)ELT295(Kar)
Matched in: Advocate Shri K. Srinivasan, Adv. Shri Mukunda Menon, Central Govt. Standing Counsel
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Collector of C ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-04-1998
Excise
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 136; Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 35L and 51(2); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A - Rules 9, 49 and 173-F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22
AIR1998SC1270; 1998(60)ECC494; 1998(99)ELT8(SC); JT1998(2)SC293; 1998(2)SCALE204; (1998)3SCC540; [1998]2SCR102
appeal is thus allowed without any order as to costs. Excise - limitation period - Sections 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 - whether period of 6 months envisaged in Section 11A for issuing show cause notice stood extended by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mittal Pipes Manufacturing Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-23-2008
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A
2008(134)ECC100; 2008(160)LC100(SC)
appellant and the revenue was right in invoking the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.8. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. Parties shall bear their own costs. Excise - Limitation - Extended period of … upon revenue records and without deciding title of plaintiff was liable to be set aside. INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT,1872[C.A.No.1/1872] Sections 35 & 114: [S.B. Sinha & H.S. Bedi, JJ] Revenue record Evidentiary value Held, It is not a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShahnaz Ayurvedics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Allahabad
Jan-29-2004
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 35C and 37B; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226
2004(173)ELT337(All)
Tariff Act, 1985, hereinafter called the 'Act 1985'. For that purpose, the provisions of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, hereinafter called 'the Act 1944' were invoked and the matter was also examined as to whether the petitioner … & LANDS REFORMS ACT, 1951 [Act No. 1/1951]. Section 3(4) & U.P. Land Revenue Act, (3 of 1901). Sections 14-A (3) & 14; [S.Rafat Alam, R.K.Agarwal & Ashok Bhushan, JJ] Expression Collector- Held, It includes Additional Collector.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSakthi Masala Private Ltd. Rep. by Its Manager M. Nachiyappan Vs. the ...
Chennai
Apr-02-2008
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A(1) and 11AC; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Companies Act; Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Rule 25; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173B and 173G; Constitution of India - Article 226
2008(129)ECC24; 2008(155)LC24(Madras); (2008)6MLJ80
Excise Tariff Act, 1985; (iii) as to why the extended period under the proviso to Section 11A(1) of Central Excise Act,1944 should not be invoked and Central Excise Duty amounting to Rs. 3,99,66,776/- and Educational Cess of Rs. 5,76,352/- … to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; (iii) as to why the extended period under the proviso to Section 11A(1) of Central Excise Act,1944 should not be invoked and Central Excise Duty amounting to Rs. 3,99,66,776/- and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBirla Jute and Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and a ...
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-09-1993
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 11A(1)
1994(69)ELT14(MP); 1993(0)MPLJ924
whereunder the petitioners have challenged the validity of show cause notice dated 29-5-1992, issued by the Collector of Central Excise, Raipur, raising demands invoking the extended period of limitation provided for under the proviso to Section 114(1) of … extended period of limitation provided for under the proviso to Section 114(1) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The show cause notice issued on 29-5-1992 relates to … invoking the extended period of limitation provided for under the proviso to Section 114(1) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) … 1-1-1988, and from that date both the units are separate factories and separate entities for the purposes of Excise Act. Annexure-E filed along with the petition, is a statement showing yearwise production and clearance of clinkers and cement … have no jurisdiction to issue notice under Section 11A proviso, taking advantage of the extended period of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKushal Fertilisers (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and Centra ...
Supreme Court of India
May-06-2009
CompanyExcise
Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11A(1), 35C, 35G, 35G(1) and 35G(3); Finance Act, 1996 - Sections 70; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 144; Customs Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 174 and 209A
2009(167)LC1(SC); 2009(238)ELT21(SC); 2009(7)SCALE476; (2009)13SCC515:2009AIRSCW4416
about 28th March, 1994, proposing demand of Central Excise Duty of Rs. 57,80,363/- under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short `the Act') and also asking the appellant to show cause as to why penalty shall not … provisions. It is, however, now not disputed that the appellant on or about 22nd January, 1991 informed the Section Officer of the Central Excise, Roorkee that it had been manufacturing M.S. conduit pipes and its production is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHind Cement Products Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-23-1987
Limitation
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 11A(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2)
1987(14)ECC26; 1987(13)LC439(Allahabad); 1987(32)ELT636(All)
and penalty may be demanded within the period specified in Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (briefly the Act, 1944). Section 11A(1) says that when any duty of excise has not been paid or … excise duty and penalty may be demanded within the period specified in Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (briefly the Act, … In para 7 of the petition, it is averred that the petitioner unit was exempted from payment of Central Excise Duty w.e.f. 1.4.1978 in terms of notification (Annexure 2), as the excisable goods upto an aggregate value not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLarsen and Tubro Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-ii
Supreme Court of India
May-02-2007
Excise
Companies Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 11A(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 49(1), 173Q, 209A and 226
2007(5)BomCR163; 2007(118)ECC12; 2007(144)LC12(SC); 2007(211)ELT513(SC); JT2007(6)SC440; 2007(6)SCALE524; [2007]8STT403
49(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (Rules) read with Section 11A of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (Act) and as to why penalty should not be imposed on them and the plant & machinery and … to Rule 49(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (Rules) read with Section 11A of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (Act) and as … & Co. Pvt. Ltd. opined that similar goods manufactured by others do not attract the provisions of the Central Excise Act. It is stated that the same bench of the Tribunal in its judgment dated 10.5.2004, in Ragunath Ramchandra
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »