Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Gupta Steel

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11AB and 38A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57AB and 57AH; Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 3 and 12

Reported in : 2008[12]STR101

under Rule 57AH (now Rule 12 of Cenvat Rules) read with Section 11A and Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were issued to the respondent-assessee for having

Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh Vs. Smithkline Beecham Consume ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 9(1) and 173G(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 11A, 38A and 38A(C)

Reported in : AIR2003SC829; 2003(2)ALD30(SC); 2003(85)ECC241; 2003(151)ELT5(SC); (2003)1MLJ158(SC); (2003)2SCC169; [2002]SUPP5SCR633

falling under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (presently Central Excise Act, 1944, in short 'the Act') have been used as raw materials or components parts from so much of the … inputs of which credit has been taken subsequently due to 'any reason'.6. In any event, according to him, Section 38A of the Act introduced by Act 14 of 2001 holds the filed, and even if the notification No.

Commissioner of Central Excrcise Faridabad Vs. Ms Food and Healthcare.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35L(b), 11A, 38A, 4 (1)(b); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q, 209A; Central Excise Rules, 2001 - Rule 25(1), 26, 9(2); Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Section 2,; Companies Act, 1956 - clause (41), Section 2,

1944 Rules) and Rule 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001 (for short the 2001 Rules) read with Section 38A of the Act and a penalty of `2 crores under Rule 209A of the 1944 Rules and Rule … D.K. JAIN, J.: 1. These appeals under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short the Act) are directed against a common final order, dated 2nd February 2005 in Appeal No.

Sunrise Structurals and Engg. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(117)LC307Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Surana Metals and Steels (i) Ltd. Vs. Cce and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)(123)ECC111

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Binani Zinc Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

by the Additional Solicitor General with reference to retrospective validation of action taken under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act 1944 under the Finance Act 2001, is relevant in this context to decide the issue. She drew our attention … appeals are to be restored in view of the amendment in the Finance Act of 2001 by inserting Section 38A therein as well as in view of the decision of the larger bench in the case of Kisan

Devala Tea Factory Vs. the Central Board of Excise and Customs and Off ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11A(1), 11AB(1), 11AC, 25(3) and 38A; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 142; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Rules 4 and 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(242)ELT219(Mad)

proceeded to pass an order dated 26.09.2002, imposing a duty of Rs. 36,572/- under Section 11AB(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and penalty of Rs. 10,000/-.2.4. There was a recession in the tea industry and several persons, including the … ordering interest on the amount of duty under Section 11AB(1) and also imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 38A read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Also, on 08.08.2003, the second respondent passed another

M/S.Rajam Industries (P) Ltd., Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944, Rule 11 of the erstwhile Central Excise (No.2) Rules 2001, read with section 38A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 inasmuch as they … as per the Rules apart from penal action, penalty and interest, under section 11AC and 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and directing the petitioner to show-cause as to why SSI exemption availed from time to time in 1999,

Punjab National Bank Vs. Union Of India Thr. Its Secretary

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

been omitted by a notification dated 12.05.2000.13. It has been contended that reliance upon the provisions contained in Section 38A of the Central 7 Excise Act, 1944 and Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 to support … very same property.30. For ready reference, the relevant provisions of the concerned Act and Rules are extracted below:­ (Central Excise Act, 1944) “Section 11. Recovery of sums due to Government. ­ In respect of duty and any other sums of any

V. Madhu @ Cv Maathesh, Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(172)ELT249Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu