Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise act 1944 section 38 · Page 1 of about 1,622 results (0.101 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 04 1987

Gtc Industries Limited, Bombay and Another Vs. Union of India and Anot ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-04-1987

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 38; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8 and 8(1)

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR256; 1988(15)ECC56; 1988(33)ELT83(Bom)

as incurred. Rule in the above terms made absolute. Excise - rescission of exemption - Section 38 of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rules 8 and 8 (1) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 - demand of excise duty pursuant to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1991

Someswara Cements and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-13-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1), 38 and 38(2); ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A, 5A(1), 11C, 38, 38(1) and 38(2)

Reported in : 1992(57)ELT593(AP)

Matched in: Advocate K. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv. I. Koty Reddy, S.C. for the Central Govt.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1979

Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Exc ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-09-1979

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1), 173C and 233; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 4(4), 37, 37(2) and 38

Reported in : 1980(6)ELT210(AP)

233 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Sections 3, 4, 4 (4), 37, 37 (2) and 38 of Central Excise Act, 1944 - notification giving benefit of exemption to manufacturers of papers in respect of payment of excise duty - … of duty'. Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules is a part of the Act by virtue of Section 38 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944............' 15. I am unable to see the relevance of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 1998

Collector of Central Excise Vs. New Tobacco Co. Etc. Etc. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-09-1998

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 -- Sections 11B, 35L and 38; Central Excise Rules, -- Rule 8; ;Defence of Indian Rules, - Rule 119 ;

Reported in : 1998IAD(SC)301; AIR1998SC668; 1998(97)ELT388(SC); JT1998(1)SC66; (1998)IIMLJ2(SC); 1998(1)SCALE58; (1998)8SCC250; [1998]1SCR63; [1998]109STC376(SC)

of India, : 1988(33)ELT83(Bom) held that publication as contemplated by Section 38 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 and Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, cannot be equated with mere printing and it is the … refund shall be determined by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise in accordance with Section 11B of the Central Excise Act.Civil Appeal Nos, 4513-4514 of 1992 are dismissed.16. Civil Appeals Nos, 1658-61 of 1994 and Civil Appeals Nos. 7719-21

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 1990

Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-29-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 33 and 35F; Central Excises Rules, 1944 - Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : 1991(33)ECC160; 1992(57)ELT12(Kar)

Matched in: Advocate Shri G. Chander Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel, ;Shri S.R. Shivaprakash and ;Shri R. Narayana, Advs. Shri Shylendra Kumar, Central Govt. Standing Counsel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1990

Saurashtra Cement and Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. U.O.i.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-12-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 10 and 57-I; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(4), 6, 11A, 12, 37, 37(1), 37(5) and 38

Reported in : 1991(55)ELT467(Guj)

Sections 3, 4, 4 (1), 4 (4), 6, 11A, 12, 37, 37 (1), 37 (5) and 38 of Central Excise Act, 1944 - Assistant Collector's demand for recovery of differential duty challenged - price list submitted was incorrect as it … the Act also provides for making rules for for imposing penalty as stated in the said sub-section. Under Section 38 all rules made and notifications issued under the Act are required to be published in the Official Gazette.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2004

Vaibhav Laminates Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Iv

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-03-2004

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 28A, 28A(1), 28A(2), 29, 29(6B) and 38; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 69; Central Excises Act, 1944; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 - Rules 46 and 47

Reported in : (2008)11VST887(AP)

basic excise duty as well as the cess levied under the provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The respondent, on July 26, 2004, issued a notice to the petitioner requesting him to quote the price/value … petitioner had sold the goods in Andhra Pradesh, but the goods were detained while they were in transit. Section 38 of the State Act clearly prohibits the applicability of the provisions of the State Act to inter-State purchases

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2004

Commercial Tax Officer and ors. Vs. Swastik Roadways and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-13-2004

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 9, 27, 28, 29, 57, 57(1), 57(2), 57(1)(2), 58, 58(1) and 59; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Rules - Rules 57 and 75; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 78, 78(2) and 78(5); Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 42(3); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(1); Tripura Sales Tax Act; ;Haryana General Sales Tax Act - Sections 38, 38(1), 38(2) and 38(3)

Reported in : JT2004(2)SC396; 2004(2)SCALE453; (2004)3SCC640; [2004]135STC1(SC)

in respect of transactions effected by the assessee to or through 'a related person' was introduced in the Central Excise Act 1944. The said new Section 4(1)(a) provided that 'value' shall be deemed to be the normal price and the … Sant Lal (supra). We do not find any merit in this argument. In Sant Lal's case, provisions of Section 38 of Haryana General Sales Tax 19 were challenged. Under Section 38(2) every clearing and forwarding agent was required

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1956

Bhikajee Dadabhai and Company Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-1956

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1), 45 and 46; Hyderabad Income-tax Act - Sections 35(3), 40, 40(1), 40(4), 57 and 58; ;Hyderabad General Clauses Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Land Customs Act, 1924; Central Excises Act, 1944; Indian Post Office Act, 1898; ;Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 7, 16, 19 and 38; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [1958]33ITR760(AP)

Customs Act, 1924, (3) the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, (4) the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and (5) the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, … (2) the Land Customs Act, 1924, (3) the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, (4) the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and (5) the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, which were extended to the whole of India, except for … Property Act which gave a person aggrieved by an order under section 7, section 16, section 19 or section 38 a right of appeal to the Custodian and the Custodian General observed at page 704 as follows :'Like

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1981

Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-12-1981

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8, 10, 10(1), 11, 12 and 173J; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 35, 35A, 36(2), 37 and 38

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT565(Mad)

173J of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Sections 3, 4, 35, 35A, 36 (2), 37 and 38 of Central Excise Act, 1944 - petition filed for issue of writ of prohibition to restrain respondent from taking any further proceedings in … the Director, Consolidation of Holdings, cannot review his previous order of dismissing the application of the petitioner under Section 42 of the Act. Hence, the subsequent review order of the director is ultra vires and without jurisdiction.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial