Advanced Search Results
M/S. Mahesh Silk Mills and Another Vs. Cce, Mumbai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Feb-06-2014
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Tax Payers Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Feb-17-2006
Service Tax
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66, 68, 68(1), 70, 71A and 83; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 1B, 9C, 9D, 11, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F, 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 66, 669(1) and 68; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 83; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 9C, 9D, 11, 11B, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F to 35O, 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D and 40; Service Tax Rules, 1997 - Rules 2, 12 and 17
(2006)205CTR(Mad)360; 2006[4]STR14
is to collect service tax from the users of service as contemplated Under Sections 12A and 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944. The second respondent rightly mentioned in all bills the details including service tax which is payable by the … 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E,, 14, 15, 35F, to 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40 of the Central Excise Act; … that every person providing taxable service to any person shall pay service tax at the rates specified in Section 68(1) of the Finance Act in such manner and within such period as may be prescribed under the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Oct-29-2020
Right to Information
that the NDPS Act, being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944, whose dominant object is 2 to protect the revenue of the State, and that therefore, judgments rendered in … end with a final report being submitted under section 173 of the CrPC to the Special Court under section 36A(1)(d) of the NDPS Act. According to the learned Senior Advocate, section 67 is to be read only with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chandra Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-25-1989
Excise
(1990)(28)LC165Tri(Delhi)
of the South Regional Bench in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Madras v.Madras Chemicals held that "Section 36A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 says that where any document is seized from the custody … Air-Conditioning Machinery falling under Tariff Item No. 29A of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. On. 30.4.1981, on an information, a contingent of the Divisional Preventive Staff attached to the Central Excise Division, … Jalandhar have filed an appeal being aggrieved from order-in-original No. 3/CE/86 dated 24.3.1986 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh.2. Briefly the facts of the case are that M/s. Chandra Industries are manufacturers of Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChariot Cement Company and ors. Vs. Cc and Ce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jan-14-2003
MRTP
(2003)(89)ECC552
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. Madras Chemicals
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Dec-12-1985
Excise
(1986)(7)LC202Tri(Chennai)
against the respondents. Reference may also be usefully made to Section 36A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 which says that where any document is seized from the custody or control of any person, the truth … 1. This appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, Madras, is directed against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) referred to supra, setting aside
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandurang Sakharam Dravid and Vs. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-03-1990
Excise
1991(34)LC256(Bombay)
such as Calcutta, Madras, Delhi and Bombay. On the basis of information received by the officers of the Central Excise, Anti-Evasion, that there had been evasion of the payment of Central Excise duty on the goods manufactured by … in the Court of C.J.M. Pune against the respondents under Section 9 of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Magistrate issued process against the respondents. The … officers of respondent No. 1. The prosecution requested the Magistrate to admit all the documents in evidence under Section 36A of the Central Excises & Salt Act. After hearing both the sides, the C.J.M. passed an order dated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEbenezer Rubbers Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-23-1986
MRTP
(1987)(10)LC407Tri(Delhi)
AIR 1970 SC 235.9. Responding, Shri K.C. Sachar refers to Section 36A of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 and points out that where any document is seized from the custody of any person, and such document … 1. In this matter the facts which survive for our consideration are that when the Central Excise Officers visited the appellant's factory on 5th October, 1979, they found that the manufacturer was concurrently preparing and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Glyph International Limited Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Mar-20-2014
Service Tax
12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 14AA, 15, 33A, 35F, 35FF, to 350 (both inclusive), 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38A and 40”.7. Section 35EE of Central Excise Act, 1944 has been made … intend to make repetition of the law and procedure relating to various subjects incorporated in different sections of Central Excise Act, 1944 referred to in Section 83 of the Finance Act 1994, adoption of relevant applicable provisions of that Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. Duke and Sons (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-18-1988
MRTP
(1989)(21)LC38Tri(Delhi)
India and Ors. 1979 ELT (J 334) and in view of the provisions of Section 4(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, cost of transportation charges have to be excluded from the assessable value, as they constitute post manufacturing costs. … 1. The proceedings in the present appeal were initiated under Section 36A(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 as in force at the relevant time by issue of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »