Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise act 1944 section 36a · Page 1 of about 39 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 06 2014

M/S. Mahesh Silk Mills and Another Vs. Cce, Mumbai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Feb-06-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2006

All India Tax Payers Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66, 68, 68(1), 70, 71A and 83; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 1B, 9C, 9D, 11, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F, 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 66, 669(1) and 68; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 83; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 9C, 9D, 11, 11B, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F to 35O, 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D and 40; Service Tax Rules, 1997 - Rules 2, 12 and 17

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Mad)360; 2006[4]STR14

is to collect service tax from the users of service as contemplated Under Sections 12A and 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944. The second respondent rightly mentioned in all bills the details including service tax which is payable by the … 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E,, 14, 15, 35F, to 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40 of the Central Excise Act; … that every person providing taxable service to any person shall pay service tax at the rates specified in Section 68(1) of the Finance Act in such manner and within such period as may be prescribed under the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2020

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2020

Subject : Right to Information

that the NDPS Act, being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944, whose dominant object is 2 to protect the revenue of the State, and that therefore, judgments rendered in … end with a final report being submitted under section 173 of the CrPC to the Special Court under section 36A(1)(d) of the NDPS Act. According to the learned Senior Advocate, section 67 is to be read only with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 1989

Chandra Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-25-1989

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)(28)LC165Tri(Delhi)

of the South Regional Bench in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Madras v.Madras Chemicals held that "Section 36A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 says that where any document is seized from the custody … Air-Conditioning Machinery falling under Tariff Item No. 29A of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. On. 30.4.1981, on an information, a contingent of the Divisional Preventive Staff attached to the Central Excise Division, … Jalandhar have filed an appeal being aggrieved from order-in-original No. 3/CE/86 dated 24.3.1986 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh.2. Briefly the facts of the case are that M/s. Chandra Industries are manufacturers of Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2003

Chariot Cement Company and ors. Vs. Cc and Ce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Jan-14-2003

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2003)(89)ECC552

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1985

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Madras Chemicals

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Dec-12-1985

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1986)(7)LC202Tri(Chennai)

against the respondents. Reference may also be usefully made to Section 36A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 which says that where any document is seized from the custody or control of any person, the truth … 1. This appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, Madras, is directed against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) referred to supra, setting aside

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1990

Pandurang Sakharam Dravid and Vs. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-03-1990

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1991(34)LC256(Bombay)

such as Calcutta, Madras, Delhi and Bombay. On the basis of information received by the officers of the Central Excise, Anti-Evasion, that there had been evasion of the payment of Central Excise duty on the goods manufactured by … in the Court of C.J.M. Pune against the respondents under Section 9 of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Magistrate issued process against the respondents. The … officers of respondent No. 1. The prosecution requested the Magistrate to admit all the documents in evidence under Section 36A of the Central Excises & Salt Act. After hearing both the sides, the C.J.M. passed an order dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 1986

Ebenezer Rubbers Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-23-1986

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1987)(10)LC407Tri(Delhi)

AIR 1970 SC 235.9. Responding, Shri K.C. Sachar refers to Section 36A of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 and points out that where any document is seized from the custody of any person, and such document … 1. In this matter the facts which survive for our consideration are that when the Central Excise Officers visited the appellant's factory on 5th October, 1979, they found that the manufacturer was concurrently preparing and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2014

M/S Glyph International Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-2014

Subject : Service Tax

12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 14AA, 15, 33A, 35F, 35FF, to 350 (both inclusive), 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38A and 40”.7. Section 35EE of Central Excise Act, 1944 has been made … intend to make repetition of the law and procedure relating to various subjects incorporated in different sections of Central Excise Act, 1944 referred to in Section 83 of the Finance Act 1994, adoption of relevant applicable provisions of that Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 1988

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Duke and Sons (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-18-1988

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1989)(21)LC38Tri(Delhi)

India and Ors. 1979 ELT (J 334) and in view of the provisions of Section 4(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, cost of transportation charges have to be excluded from the assessable value, as they constitute post manufacturing costs. … 1. The proceedings in the present appeal were initiated under Section 36A(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 as in force at the relevant time by issue of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial