Advanced Search Results

Jaycee Engg. Services Vs. Cegat, Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F and 35K; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(141)ELT53(Mad)

Consequently MP. No. 14444 of 93 also is dismissed. Excise - pre-deposit - Sections 35F and 35K of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - allegation against petitioner by authorities that they manufactured and cleared … and without payment of Central Excise duty leviable thereon and hereby contravened the provision of Rule 174 r/w Section 6 of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and also certain other provisions of the said Act and

Ampol (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(106)LC322Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Indian Oxygen Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(160)ELT464Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Sridhar Paints Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S Siv Industries Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

placed the file for passing final order in terms of Section 35C read with Section 35K of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on account of Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Madras has answered reference in R.C. 1 of 1998

G. Radhakrishnan Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35K

Reported in : 2002(144)ELT299(Ker)

the search was made in violation of the provisions of Section 18 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 and Section 165 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He has also contended that, in the meantime, the … was called upon to show cause why a sum of Rs. 46,01,326.60 shall not be recovered by the Central Excise. He has also prayed for a direction to quash Ext. P4, the scheme of the advance rewards payable

Collector of Central Excise, Madras Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35K

Reported in : 2002(141)ELT334(Mad)

circumstances of the case, the provisional assessment resorted to under Rule 9B read with Rule 173J of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on whatever ground would render assessment provisional as a whole so that the limitation for purposes

Sunder Ispat Limited Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex., Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35K; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(79)ECC442; 2002(141)ELT24(AP)

prejudice to any other notice or action that may be contemplated against the parties mentioned herein, under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder or under any other Act which is in force for the time being

Sundaram Clayton Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(160)ELT640Tri(Chennai)

below: As to whether Notification No. 217 of 1986 CE dated 02.04.1986 issued under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules exempting the specified inputs manufactured in a factory and used within the factory of production in or … 1. The matter has been listed for passing final order today under Section 35K of the CE Act, 1944 on the High Court of Madras answering the reference in their reference case No. 2 of 1996 dated

Laxmi Rolling Mills Vs. C.E.G.A.T., New Delhi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35K; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(80)ECC84; 2002(142)ELT327(All)

towards duty and as to why they may not be penalized for contravening the various provisions of the Central Excise Act and Rules framed thereunder. The petitioners filed show cause reiterating that they were entitled to the benefit of … others (1999 U.P.T.C.-1262). That was a case in which the assessing officer in exercise of the powers under Section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act passed an order directing the assessee to get the accounts audited by nominated