Advanced Search Results

Afcons Infrastructure Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I would constitute due service for the purposes of section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as „the said Act‟). It is for these reasons that the Division Bench which passed

…appellant/Petitioner Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata Iv ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

It is the case of the petitioner that it had preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated June 15, 2007 passed by the CustoMs.Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Zonal … of Commissioner of Central Excise versus ITC Limited (supra).the legislature brought in a separate provision by way of section 35FF with effect from May 10, 2008, subsequent to the material period involved herein, viz. May 25, 2005 to

M/S Santani Sales Organisation vs.central Excise, Customs and Service ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

case Appellant wins then appellant is eligible to interest from the date of deposit it made, as per Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 129EE of the Customs Act, 1962, all introduced w.e.f. 06.08.2014. … SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Question raised in the present writ petition is whether as per Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (C.E. Act, for short) the petitioner- assessee on filing of second appeal before the Central Excise, Customs and

Madura Coats Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

It is the case of the petitioner that it had preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated June 15, 2007 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East … Commissioner of Central Excise vs. ITC Limited (supra), the legislature brought in a separate provision by way of section 35FF with effect from May 10, 2008, subsequent to the material period involved herein, viz. May 25, 2005 to

Madura Coats Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

It is the case of the petitioner that it had preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated June 15, 2007 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East … Commissioner of Central Excise vs. ITC Limited (supra), the legislature brought in a separate provision by way of section 35FF with effect from May 10, 2008, subsequent to the material period involved herein, viz. May 25, 2005 to

M/S Glyph International Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

intend to make repetition of the law and procedure relating to various subjects incorporated in different sections of Central Excise Act, 1944 referred to in Section 83 of the Finance Act 1994, adoption of relevant applicable provisions of that Act … a duty excise:- 9C, 9D, 11B, 11C, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 14AA, 15, 33A, 35F, 35FF, to 350 (both inclusive), 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38A and 40”.7. Section 35EE of

Vanavil Dyes and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Joint Secretary (Revision Applicat ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules - Rules 57F(1), 173H and 173H(3); Central Excise Act - Sections 35EE, 35EE(2) and 35FF(4); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2003(158)ELT432(Mad)

57F (1) and 173H (3) of Central Excise Rules and Sections 35EE, 35EE (2) and 35FF (4) of Central Excise Act - petitioner filed application for rebate - Appellate Tribunal accepted petitioner's claim - department filed revision application before … fall under sub-rule (3) of Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and the claim for rebate on the basis of duty paid by … opportunity to the petitioner to put forth his objection on the question of maintainability of the application under Section 35FF (4) cannot be countenanced, that the reasons given by the first respondent in entertaining the revision without assigning

National Building Construction Company Limited vs.union of India & ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

been conducted or arrest has been made under Section 90 of the Fin Act. Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as CE Act) states that summons could be issued by an officer making an enquiry. … 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 15A, 15B, 31, 32, 32A to 32P (both inclusive), 33A, 34A, 35EE, 35F, 35FF, to 35- O (both inclusive), 35Q, 35R, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38A and 40.” The

M/S.Ventrapathi Financial Serv Vs. The Superintendent ofcentral Excise ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

service tax on the petitioner. The procedure of service of notice and passing orders as enumerated in the Central Excise Act, 1944 has been made part of the service tax by virtue of Section 83 of the Finance Act. For … 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, [31, 32, 32A to 32P (both inclusive),].33A, 34A, 35EE, 35F, 35FF to 35-O (both inclusive).35Q, 35R, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38A and 40. From the facts