Advanced Search Results
Net Plast Ltd., Kanpur Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur and ...
Allahabad
May-26-1999
Excise
Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 5; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
1999(3)AWC2003; 1999(113)ELT791(All); 2000(116)ELT451(All)
maintainability of appeal - Chapter 8 Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 and Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 - special appeal from interim Order of Commissioner - whether such special appeal is maintainable under Rule 5
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPak Products Vs. Union of India
Gujarat
Apr-25-1990
Excise
Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 35F
1995(76)ELT32(Guj); (1990)2GLR1237
party concerned for the purpose of dispensing with the deposit. Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, reads as follows : '35F. Deposit, pending appeal, of duty demanded or penalty levied. - Where in any … this matter today for final hearing. 4. The main contention of the petitioner is that the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) has not given opportunity to the petitioner to appear and represent its case for having the deposit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.C.W. Limited Vs. Commissioner (Appeals)
Gujarat
Jan-18-1997
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F
1998(97)ELT424(Guj); (1997)2GLR913
Court may grant stay without going into merits and without imposing any condition. 4. Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 reads as follows : '35F. Deposit, pending appeal, of duty demanded or penalty levied - Wherein any appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Suraj Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Union of India
Gujarat
Mar-08-1999
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129A and 129E; Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973
2000(68)ECC257; 2000(115)ELT280(Guj)
this submission, the appeals were pending. He invited our attention to Chapter VIA and Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35F reads as under : '35F - Wherein any appeal under this Chapter, the decision or order appealed against
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPromising Exports Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-23-2009
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11, 11D, 35B, 35B(1), 35C, 35C(2A), 35E, 35D, 35F, 35G and 35L; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 124, 129, 129(1), 129A, 129B, 129B(2A), 129E, 130 and 142; ;Finance Act, 1980; ;Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57CC; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 - Rule 6; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; ;Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 28A, 28A(1) to (5) and 28A(6); ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 5, 18, 19, 20, 28A, 41 and 173Q; ;Constitution of India - Article 14
2009(168)LC253(Calcutta),2009(243)ELT3(Cal)
dismissing the appeals for non-compliance of the orders passed by it directing predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ('Central Excise Act' for short) or under 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short the 'Customs Act').2.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTitawi Sugar Complex Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.
Allahabad
Jan-25-2002
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F
2002(82)ECC542; 2003(159)ELT101(All)
appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Ghaziabad along with an application under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short 'the Act') for dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of the duty as well as penalty
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindoworth India Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under Indian Companies Act ...
Mumbai
Mar-25-2010
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35F, 35G and 35G(1)
2010(112)BomLR2074,2010(175)LC260(Bombay),2010(253)ELT364(Bom)
of parties.3. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 directing the petitioner to deposit about half of the amount of the duty i.e. to deposit an amount
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Rastriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors ...
Mumbai
Jun-28-2011
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35F; Companies' Act, 1956 - Section 617; Constitution of India - Article 226
Tax Appellate Tribunal on an application for waiver of the condition of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Though six questions of law have been raised, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant has confined the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Jul-23-1990
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F
1990(50)ELT338(Bom)
because of the failure to comply with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 the appeal was dismissed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals).2. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise passed … waives service on behalf of the respondents.Heard counsel.1. The grievance of the petitioners is that the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay has disposed of the applications for stay of the order passed by the Assistant Collector of … to the petitioner and holding that he was not satisfied that pre-deposit required under Section 35F of the Excise Act would cause undue hardship to the petitioner as to warrant a waiver of the same. As a consequence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.K. Paints Industries and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Mar-01-2002
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 22(1)
2002(82)ECC38; 2002(144)ELT255(Del)
and not depositing of duty levied upon the petitioners under Section 35F of the Central Excise and Sat Act, 1944. While issuing rule D.B. on 2nd August, 1985 this court noted the question of law relating to jurisdiction, … respondent No. 2 refusing the stay of implementation of order dated 3rd July, 1984 of the Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi and not depositing of duty levied upon the petitioners under Section 35F of the Central Excise
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »