Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise act 1944 section 35f · Page 1 of about 883 results (0.026 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 26 1999

Net Plast Ltd., Kanpur Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-26-1999

Subject : Excise

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 5; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2003; 1999(113)ELT791(All); 2000(116)ELT451(All)

maintainability of appeal - Chapter 8 Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 and Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 - special appeal from interim Order of Commissioner - whether such special appeal is maintainable under Rule 5

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1990

Pak Products Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-25-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 1995(76)ELT32(Guj); (1990)2GLR1237

party concerned for the purpose of dispensing with the deposit. Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, reads as follows : '35F. Deposit, pending appeal, of duty demanded or penalty levied. - Where in any … this matter today for final hearing. 4. The main contention of the petitioner is that the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) has not given opportunity to the petitioner to appear and represent its case for having the deposit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1997

D.C.W. Limited Vs. Commissioner (Appeals)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-18-1997

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 1998(97)ELT424(Guj); (1997)2GLR913

Court may grant stay without going into merits and without imposing any condition. 4. Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 reads as follows : '35F. Deposit, pending appeal, of duty demanded or penalty levied - Wherein any appeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 08 1999

Suraj Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-08-1999

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129A and 129E; Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973

Reported in : 2000(68)ECC257; 2000(115)ELT280(Guj)

this submission, the appeals were pending. He invited our attention to Chapter VIA and Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35F reads as under : '35F - Wherein any appeal under this Chapter, the decision or order appealed against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 2009

Promising Exports Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-23-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11, 11D, 35B, 35B(1), 35C, 35C(2A), 35E, 35D, 35F, 35G and 35L; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 124, 129, 129(1), 129A, 129B, 129B(2A), 129E, 130 and 142; ;Finance Act, 1980; ;Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57CC; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 - Rule 6; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; ;Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 28A, 28A(1) to (5) and 28A(6); ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 5, 18, 19, 20, 28A, 41 and 173Q; ;Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2009(168)LC253(Calcutta),2009(243)ELT3(Cal)

dismissing the appeals for non-compliance of the orders passed by it directing predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ('Central Excise Act' for short) or under 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short the 'Customs Act').2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2002

Titawi Sugar Complex Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC542; 2003(159)ELT101(All)

appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Ghaziabad along with an application under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short 'the Act') for dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of the duty as well as penalty

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2010

indoworth India Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under Indian Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-2010

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35F, 35G and 35G(1)

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR2074,2010(175)LC260(Bombay),2010(253)ELT364(Bom)

of parties.3. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 directing the petitioner to deposit about half of the amount of the duty i.e. to deposit an amount

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2011

M/S.Rastriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-2011

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35F; Companies' Act, 1956 - Section 617; Constitution of India - Article 226

Tax Appellate Tribunal on an application for waiver of the condition of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Though six questions of law have been raised, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant has confined the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1990

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-23-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 1990(50)ELT338(Bom)

because of the failure to comply with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 the appeal was dismissed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals).2. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise passed … waives service on behalf of the respondents.Heard counsel.1. The grievance of the petitioners is that the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay has disposed of the applications for stay of the order passed by the Assistant Collector of … to the petitioner and holding that he was not satisfied that pre-deposit required under Section 35F of the Excise Act would cause undue hardship to the petitioner as to warrant a waiver of the same. As a consequence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2002

U.K. Paints Industries and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-01-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 22(1)

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC38; 2002(144)ELT255(Del)

and not depositing of duty levied upon the petitioners under Section 35F of the Central Excise and Sat Act, 1944. While issuing rule D.B. on 2nd August, 1985 this court noted the question of law relating to jurisdiction, … respondent No. 2 refusing the stay of implementation of order dated 3rd July, 1984 of the Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi and not depositing of duty levied upon the petitioners under Section 35F of the Central Excise

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial