Advanced Search Results

Charan Kamal Board and Paper Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. C.C.E.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35EE; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173C and 198; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(59)ECC247; 1997(93)ELT335(P& H)

in the manufacture of paper for which if has been granted licence under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 and the rules framed thereunder.3. On 18-11-1985, the Central Excise preventive staff made a surprise visit to the … Central Government to interfere with the order passed by the Collector was wholly unwarranted because under proviso to Section 35EE 'the Act of 1944', the Central Government does not have the power to entertain revision petition against the … Singhvi, J.1. This is a petition to quash the orders dated 23-6-1988 and 28-10-1988 passed by the Collector, Central Excise, Chandigarh and the order dated 27-2-1991 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I impugning orders passed by the Government of India under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944(Act, for short). The said orders are authored by Joint Secretary to the Government of India, who has been

India Pistons Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1999(113)ELT793(Mad)

be dismissed, and accordingly, it is dismissed. No cost. Excise - period of limitation - Section 35EE of Central Excise Act, 1944 - no period of limitation prescribed under provisions of Section 35EE (4) for exercise of suo motu power

Aarti Industries Limited Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary Min ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

order dated 7 September 2012 passed by the Government of India in Revision under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (œthe Act?). 3) The petitioner had exported goods on payment of duty aggregating to Rs.1,34,415/-. On export of

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Indorama Textiles Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 11B and 35EE; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 37; Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Rules 18, 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Central Excise (No. 2) Rules, 2001; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 12, 12(1) and 13; Central Excise Rules, 2001

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR664; 2006(200)ELT3(Bom)

Department of Revenue, vested with the powers to act as a revisional authority under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, 'the Act').3. The respondent no. 1 filed 45 rebate claims amounting to Rs. 1,46,90,995/- (Rs. 75,42,487/-

Rudra Bilas Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. Vs. Addl. Secy. to Govt. of ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35EE(1) and 35EE(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(102)ELT546(All)

Secretary to the Government of India under Sub-section (4) or Section 35EE of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Sub-section (4) reads 'The Central Government may, of its own motion, annul or modify any order referred to … quintals without any entry for regular removal of the balance quantity of 5486.36 quintals. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Rampur was not satisfied about the explanation given by the petitioner for the above discrepancy and, therefore, demanded

Grasim Industries Ltd Vs Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Central Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35EE ; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

against the order dated 01.12.2009 issued by the Joint Secretary, Government of India under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act"). The petitioner had claimed rebate in respect of central excise duty

Union of India Vs. M/S. Sheetal Exports and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35EE

to challenge an order passed by the revisional authority in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Assistant Commissioner had initially rejected rebate claims preferred by the First Respondent in the amount of Rs.

Best and Crompton Engineering Ltd. Vs. Maritime C.C.E.

Court : Chennai

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35EE; Central Excise Rules - Rules 12 and 189A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(101)ELT25(Mad)

Matched in: Advocate K.P. Jayadeeran, Adv. K. Jayachandran, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel

M/S.Orchid Health Care (a Division O Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceutic ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

and claim the rebate thereon. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed a revision application, under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and it had also been rejected by the first respondent, which is the authority to hear the revision