Advanced Search Results

Shalimar Rubber Industries Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G, 35L and 35-O

Reported in : 1998(103)ELT217(Del)

the order dated 9 April, 1996. Against the order dated 5 February, 1997 the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 provides for remedy of reference to this Court under Section 35G of the Act. It may be noticed … ORDER1. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 9 April, 1996 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal as also to the order dated 5 February, 1997 passed by the Tribunal … Act, 1944 provides for remedy of reference to this Court under Section 35G of the Act. It may be noticed that the order made on … ORDER1. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 9 April,

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Sonatapes Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35, 35A and 35B(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57(O)

Reported in : 2008(3)BomCR709; 2008(132)ECC302; 2008(158)LC302(Bombay); 2008(229)ELT167(Bom); 2009[16]STR667

included in the list of capital goods described in the explanation below Rule 57(O) of Central Excise Rules, 1944. He came to the conclusion that the retrospective application of the notification and giving benefit of Modvat credit … the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) as bad in law for the purpose of Section 35(B)(2) of the Central Excise Act.8. It appears that the CEGAT has relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of

Omaxe Buildhome Limited vs.union of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and Others. : (2008) 3 SCC70 the Supreme Court had considered the provisions of Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 which also limited the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Appeals to condone the delay in filing an appeal, … $~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1722/2019 % OMAXE BUILDHOME LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Tanveer Ahmed Mir

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Wander India Limited

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)(25)ECC315

Excise could legally pass a second order of review under Section 35-E of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 on 9.1.85 for filing appeal in respect of the five products of Resteclin and Reclor groups of capsules … provides that the labelling should be done in the prescribed manner. There is no such requirement in the Central Excise Act or Rule or the Tariff. The Notification No.116/69-CE also does not stipulate that labels of the medicines should … On merits of the cases, these appeals relate to a common issue, viz.,

Devinder Narang Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

50 lacs as a pre-condition for the hearing of his appeal, in terms of Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act').out of the penalty of ` 3,50,00,000/- which is under challenge in the appeal. The … CUSAP No.1 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 CUSAP No.1 of 2013

AmIn Chand Payarelal Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1984)(16)ELT126TriDel

to Collector (Appeals) :-(1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this Act by a Central Excise Officer lower rank than a Collector of Central Excise may appeal to the Collector of ( entral Excise … precedent to the hearing of the appeal as required by Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act 1944 (as amended by Finance Act No. 2 being Act No. 44 of 1980) hereinafter referred to as the … with notification dated 4-5-1963 by which Section 129 of the Customs Act was sought to be applied to Section 35 (unamended) of the Central Excises and Salt Act.That notification was held to be invalid, for it resulted in … did not agree with the decision dated 17-8-1983 given by another Bench of the Tribunal in Appeal No. ED(SP)67/83C. This is how the matter is

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Aromatic Intermediates and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)LC95Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Shruti Colorants Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AC, 35, 35(1), 35C, 35E(3), 35H, 35G and 35G(9); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Income Tax Act, 1962 - Sections 130; National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 - Sections 15, 23, 23(1) and 24; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 12, 14, 14(2) and 29(2); ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(3) and 43; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1976; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18(1), 18(2), 18(3) and 28A; Sales Tax Act - Sections 10; Central Excise Rules - Rule 57A, 57D(2) and 57F(4)

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3251; 2008(133)ECC197; 2008(159)LC197(Bombay); 2009(233)ELT171(Bom); 2009[13]STR358

of the above seven Appeals preferred by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). All these Appeals are barred by time. The Appellant in all the … for doubt that Section 35G would be liable to a liberal construction reading into it the provisions of Section 35 of the Act in comparison with Section 35G of the Act.22. In the case of Punjab Fibres Ltd. … Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. By this common order, we will dispose of the above seven Appeals preferred by the Commissioner

JaIn Spinners Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1995)LC565Tri(Delhi)

1. Being aggrieved with the rejection of the appeal by the Collector of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals), Pune, as time-barred, the appellants have filed the present appeal.2. Brief facts of the case … any other person as required under the amended provisions of Section 11B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. On the point of sufficient cause for Condonation of Delay by the Collector (Appeals), he submitted that the … 1. Being aggrieved with the rejection of the appeal by the Collector of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals), Pune, … six months in filing appeal from the date of the order appealed against. In this regard provisions of Section 35 are very clear as they require that an appeal should be filed within three months from the date

Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 2000(55)DRJ648; 2000(72)ECC717; 2003(151)ELT496(Del)

Arijit Pasayat, C.J.1. Petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.9.2000 passed under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short, the Act) by the Central Excise & Gold Control Appellate Tribunal (in short, Tribunal) in stay … Arijit Pasayat, C.J.1. Petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.9.2000 passed under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short, the Act) by the