Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise act 1944 section 35 · Page 1 of about 3,005 results (0.056 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 2001

Kvr Forgings Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2001

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35-H; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 218 (1); A. P. Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 69

Reported in : 2001(3)ALD528; 2001(3)ALT628; 2001(132)ELT588(AP)

the A.P Court fees and Suits Valuation Act, but it is in terms of Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 218(1) of the Central Excise Rules and Form EA 6.3. Sub-section (1) of Section 35-H

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2004

M.R. Tobacco Pvt. Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-20-2004

Subject : ExciseLimitation

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29(2)

Reported in : 2004(74)DRJ574; 2004(94)ECC373; 2004(178)ELT137(Del)

by the petitioner against the said order-in-original dated 17.05.2002 which was filed on 28.07.2002. Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') provides for appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) and reads as under:-'

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2000

itw Singnode India Ltd., Hyd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Customs an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-22-2000

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11-B; Central Excise Rules, 1944; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 35; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD167; 2000(3)ALT676; 2000(71)ECC49; 2000(122)ELT651(AP)

(Rupees one crore only) paid as a pre-dcposit on 28-11-1997 with interest as per Section 11-BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 from the date immediately after the expiry of three months from the date of refund of the said … while assailing the order of the first respondent dated 18-11-1999 would contend that refund of prc-deposit made under Section 35-F of the Act for availing right of appeal is bound to be refunded when appeal is allowed. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 30 2004

Navinon Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-30-2004

Subject : ExciseLimitation

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR58; 2005(101)ECC532; 2008[12]STR84; [2009]19STT203

Excise (Appeals) held that the appeal was not maintainable being barred by limitation prescribed under section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'Central Excise Act). The petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the order of the Commissioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1983

Tirumalesa Sugars, Palakol Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-15-1983

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35

Reported in : 1985(21)ELT71(AP)

Matched in: Advocate Y. Suryanarayana, Adv. K. Jagannadha Rao, Standing Counsel for the Central Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1965

A.S. Bava Vs. Collector of Customs and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-28-1965

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12 and 35; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 189; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129

Reported in : AIR1966Ker195

There will be no order as to costs. Customs - duty - Sections 12, 35 and 40 of Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 189 of Sea Customs Act, 1878 and Section 129 of Customs Act, 1962 - matter pertaining to demand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1991

National Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-19-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35 and 35B

Reported in : 1994LC147(Madras); 1992(58)ELT174(Mad)

Matched in: Advocate Shri N.S. Nandakumar, Adv. Shri A.S. Venkatachalamoorthy, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 1960

Veerabhadraswara Rice and Oil Mill, 1-4 No. 169/56, Vizianagaram City ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-04-1960

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 213 and 225; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR1961AP350

duty and the levy of fines and penalty. Intending to file an appeal under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act read with Rule 213, the petitioner requested the Appellate Authority, the Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad to furnish … of the Central Excises Act nor Rule 218 contemplate an oral hearing. 15. The Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder are for providing for the law relating to the levy of the central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1998

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Technological Institute of Tex ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-09-1998

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35-G

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(Delhi)386; 76(1998)DLT862; 1998(47)DRJ667

sanctioned if otherwise due and admissible.2. Feeling aggrieved, the Department filed an application under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 seeking statement of case to High Court for its opinion on a question of law arising out of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2003

Electrofronts Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-02-2003

Subject : ExciseLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR788; 2003(162)ELT1182(Bom)

before 20th June, 2001. Further, respondent No. 3 was empowered under the proviso to Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ('the Act' for short) to condone the delay in filing an appeal up to a further period of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial