Advanced Search Results

Kakda Impex (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : FERA

Reported in : (2005)(98)ECC230

the Commission issues terms of Settlement on the application filed by the appellant, as per Section 32G of Central Excise Act, 1944. It has also observed that the retention of this amount of Rs. 50 Lakhs is for purpose of

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Shruti Colorants Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AC, 35, 35(1), 35C, 35E(3), 35H, 35G and 35G(9); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Income Tax Act, 1962 - Sections 130; National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 - Sections 15, 23, 23(1) and 24; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 12, 14, 14(2) and 29(2); ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(3) and 43; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1976; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18(1), 18(2), 18(3) and 28A; Sales Tax Act - Sections 10; Central Excise Rules - Rule 57A, 57D(2) and 57F(4)

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3251; 2008(133)ECC197; 2008(159)LC197(Bombay); 2009(233)ELT171(Bom); 2009[13]STR358

of the above seven Appeals preferred by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). All these Appeals are barred by time. The Appellant in all the … condone the delay or to entertain an appeal if filed beyond the prescribed period of limitation under Section 32G(2)(a). It must be noticed that the section elaborately deals with the necessity for framing the question of law

Sicom Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 27, 29, 30, 31, 31(1), 32A to 32F, 41, 41A, 44, 46 and 46(1); Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Rules - Rule 230 and 230(2); Electricity Act - Sections 24; Customs Act, 1961; State Financial Corporations (Amendment) Act, 1985 - Sections 21; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 68; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 32G, 169, 169(1) and 169(2); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 226 and 372(1)

Reported in : AIR2007Bom1; I(2007)BC82; 2006(6)BomCR159; [2006]133CompCas610(Bom); 2006(203)ELT34(Bom)

Corporation Act, 1951. This statute is a special enactment and enacted later in point of time vis-a-vis the Central Excise Act, 1944, which is a general Act. He submits that Section 46 of the Act also contains a non-obstante clause,

Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation Limi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 29(4), 28B, 32, 32G and 46B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Contract Act - Sections 172 and 173; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 142 and 142(1); Electricity Act - Sections 24; Central Excise Act, 1944; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 21; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 230(2); Property of Defaulters for Recovery of Government Dues Rules, 1995

Reported in : [2005]128CompCas31(Kar); 2005(103)ECC248; 2005(187)ELT12(Kar); ILR2005KAR3572; 2005(5)KarLJ286; [2005]63SCL67(Kar)

The Court has further held that the Act is a special enactment, whereas the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 is a general enactment and that the Act prevails over the general enactments.19. He has further relied upon … of the Central Excise Rules would be attracted. The Court also further held that the Act and the Central Excise Act are both special enactments and that unless in the operation of the same any conflict arises, it would … parties who intend to purchase assets brought to sale in terms of Section 29 of the Act, by the Petitioner.5. The facts in each petition

Balaodra Bonju Babu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

37 of the NDPS Act, the same principles have been reiterated, in the decisions reported in Superintendent, Narcotics Central Bureau v. R.Paulsamy [2000 KHC 1549: AIR 2000 SC 3661:(2000) 9 SCC 549: 2001 SCC (Cri) 648: 2001 … AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN 09.01.2023 IN CRMP AGAINST SC/ST) & NDPS ACT, MANJERI. CRIME NO.30/2021 OF PARAPPANANGADI EXCISE RANGE OFFICE PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED: BALODRA BONJU BABU, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.MATSYA LINGAM,34/22 OLDA VILLAGE, SANTHARI.P.O, HUKKAMPETTI POLICE STATION … MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023/4TH PHALGUNA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO.897 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN 09.01.2023 IN … RDated, this the 23th February, 2023 This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the petitioner is the