Advanced Search Results
Shree Flavours Llp vs.government of India & Ors.
Delhi
Sep-01-2017
Land Acquisition
Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission (hereafter referred to as ‘Settlement Commission’) constituted under Section 32 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CEA’), to send the matter to the adjudicating authority by rejecting the application … to avail of the remedy before the Settlement Commission if the present petition is rejected in view of Section 32 O of the CEA and therefore it should be given a chance to approach the Settlement Commission. If the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Ltd. (formerly known as M/s. Premier Automobiles Ltd. Through ...
Mumbai
Sep-29-2014
Land Acquisition
dated 16th December, 2012 and impugned notice of demand dated 29th October, 2012 as being ultra vires of Central Excise Act, 1944 and violative of Article 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India on the ground that no interest is … by the Respondents. The Petitioners also impugn notification No.68/63-CE dated 4th May, 1963 to the extent it makes section 142(1)(c)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applicable to the Petitioners, as illegal, without jurisdiction and ultra vires … the assessments are finalized on or after 1.7.2001.” That even though section 32(2)(bb) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 granted powers to the Central Government … service. By consent Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. In Writ Petition No.1915 of 2013 the Petitioners challenge the recovery of sum of Rs.49.28 crores and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYangir Synthetics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Apr-19-2006
Excise
further noticed that under notification No. 32/94 tariff value under Section 3 of the Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 was fixed at Rs. 105/- per kg. in respect of Polyester Filament Texturised Yarn.In view of this the … should be set aside.7. We have considered the submission. We find that as per Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, the duty leviable in respect of the clearance effected by 100% E.O.U shall be an amount equal to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S.R. Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-17-2003
Service Tax
(2004)(170)ELT232TriDel
the Commissioner has also imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,000/- under Rule 226 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, which is not challenged by them; that the Commissioner has, further, imposed a penalty of Rs. 28 lakhs … of Customs Act are inapplicable as the goods, manufactured by them, attract duty under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act; that such a view has been taken by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of … In this appeal, M/s. S.R. Industries Ltd. are challenging the penalty imposed on, and redemption fine demanded from them.2. Shri K.K. Anand, learned Advocate, submitted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissionerate Vs. Rohit Ferro Tech Ltd. and Ors.
Kolkata
Feb-03-2016
Education
time. This case arises out of an application made by the writ petitioner under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with regard to the fifth show-cause notice. It appears that the Settlement Commission in its order dated 28th … earlier point of time. This case arises out of an application made by the writ petitioner under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with regard to the fifth show-cause notice. It appears that the Settlement … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL AT WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PRESENT: The Hon’ble Justice Soumitra Pal The Hon’ble Justice Mir Dara
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRohit Ferro Tech Ltd. and ors. Vs. Settlement Commission and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-26-2014
Right to Information
time. This case arises out of an application made by the writ petitioner under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with regard to the fifth show-cause notice. It appears that the Settlement Commission in its order dated 28th … earlier point of time. This case arises out of an application made by the writ petitioner under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with regard to the fifth show-cause notice. It appears that the Settlement … WP No.393 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Aromatic Intermediates and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-30-1990
Land Acquisition
(1991)LC95Tri(Delhi)
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParasrampuria International Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-17-2002
Excise
(2003)(152)ELT142TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiddharth Optical Disc Pvt. Ltd and Another Vs. Union of India and Ano ...
Delhi
Jan-11-2013
Land Acquisition
them by invoking extended period of five years under proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by manufacturing excisable goods i.e. Blank CDs/DVDs which arise at an intermediate stage and clearing the same for … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 01.2013 WP (C) No. 13231/2009 SIDDHARTH OPTICAL DISC PVT.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiddharth Optical Disc Pvt. Ltd and Others Vs. Union of India and Anot ...
Delhi
Jan-11-2013
Land Acquisition
them by invoking extended period of five years under proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by manufacturing excisable goods i.e. Blank CDs/DVDs which arise at an intermediate stage and clearing the same for … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 01.2013 WP (C) No. 13231/2009 SIDDHARTH OPTICAL DISC PVT.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »