Advanced Search Results

Alkali and Chemical Corporation of India Limited Vs. Union of India an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944; Indian Tariff Act, 1934 - Sections 2A; Indian Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1972

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT22(Del)

to costs. The case questioned whether beta-naphthol was liable to excise duty under Tariff item 14-D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - It was held that Item No. 14 D was only applicable either to a synthetic organic dye … 14D of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 read with the provisions of Section 2A of the Indian Tariff Act, 1934. The petitioner further seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to

Navgujarat Paper Industries Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 37 and 37(2); Indian Tariff Act, 1934 - Sections 2A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8

Reported in : 1977(1)ELT67(Guj)

rule is made absolute accordingly. Excise - duty - Sections 3, 37 and 37 (2) of Central Excises Act, 1944, Section 2A of Indian Tariff Act, 1934 and Rule 8 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 - petitioners-factory were producing gummed

Promising Exports Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11, 11D, 35B, 35B(1), 35C, 35C(2A), 35E, 35D, 35F, 35G and 35L; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 124, 129, 129(1), 129A, 129B, 129B(2A), 129E, 130 and 142; ;Finance Act, 1980; ;Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57CC; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 - Rule 6; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002; ;Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; ;Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 28A, 28A(1) to (5) and 28A(6); ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 5, 18, 19, 20, 28A, 41 and 173Q; ;Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2009(168)LC253(Calcutta),2009(243)ELT3(Cal)

dismissing the appeals for non-compliance of the orders passed by it directing predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ('Central Excise Act' for short) or under 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short the 'Customs Act').2.

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Dharamendra Textile Processors and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3A, 3A(3), 3A(4), 9, 11A, 11A(2), 11AB, 11AC and 15H; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 96ZO, 96ZQ, 96ZQ(5), 9620(3), 173Q, 173G(1) and 173G(4); Finance Act, 1996; Finance Act, 2000; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 115O(2), 132, 132(4), 139, 139(1), 142(1), 142(2A), 143, 143(1), 143(2), 148, 153(1), 194B, 271, 271(1), 271B, 271C, 271F, 272(1), 272A and 276C; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 12B, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15F, 15G, 15H, 15I, 15J and 24; Forgien Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 10(1), 23, 23(1) and 37(1); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 - Regulation 25(7); Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997; Hot

Reported in : 2008(133)ECC247; 2008(159)LC247(SC); 2008(231)ELT3(SC); [2008]306ITR277(SC); JT2008(11)SC255; 2008(13)SCALE233; (2009)11VatReporter63; (2008)18VST180(SC); 2008AIRSCW8038

SCALE 304. The question which arises for determination in all these appeals is whether Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short the `Act') inserted by Finance Act, 1996 with the intention of imposing mandatory penalty on persons

Asiatic Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)(224)ELT406Tri(Kol.)kata

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Givaudan India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

similar to Board's Circular No.396/29/98-CX dated 2.6.1998 should be taken. The two provisos to Section 35C(2A) of the Central excise Act, 1944 read as follows : Provided that where an order of stay is made in any proceeding relating to

Kishan Lal Dalmia Vs. Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 3; ;Public Demands Recovery Act; ;Indian Tariff Act, 1934 - Section 2A; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 7, 8(1), 9, 173 and 173G

Reported in : 1990(25)ECC426,1986(26)ELT76(Cal)

the market through various dealers are duty paid, if any duty is leviable on such goods under the Central Excise Act and the Rules. Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules specifically provides that no excisable goods shall be … the petitioner by the Central Excise Authorities Consequent upon the assessments made under the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944.2. The facts are in a narrow compass:The petitioner purchased cold rolled strips from the market in the usual … said Item, and on which the appropriate amount of the duty of excise or the additional duty under Section 2A of the Indian Tariff Act, 1934 (32 of 1934), as the case may be, has been paid, from … rolled strips--Does not amount to manufacture--Re-rolled products not liable to duty again--Central Excises and Salt Act (1 of 1944), Section 2(f); Schedule I, item 26 AA. -

Nandan Iron and Metal Industries Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Indian Tariff Act, 1934 - Sections 2A; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT47(All)

under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the order of the Asstt. Collector, Central Excise, dated 23-5-1970, the appellate order of the Appellate Collector, Central Excise, dated 28-5-1973 and the order of the … of the petitioners, it is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the notification thereunder relied on by the petitioners.4. Section 3 of … where the prescribed amount of duty of excise, or, as the case may, the additional duty leviable under Section 2A of the Indian Tariff Act, 1934 (32 of 1934) has been paid on the copper or the copper

Coromandel Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act; Central Excises Act - 1944

Reported in : AIR1984SC1772; (1984)3CompLJ289(SC); 1984(3)ECC98; 1984(17)ELT607(SC); 1984(2)SCALE282; 1984Supp(1)SCC457; [1985]1SCR523; 1985(17)LC133(SC)

Special Leave Petitions. We, however, propose to make no order as to costs. (i) Excise - exemption - Central Excise Act, 1944, Rule 8 (1) of Central Excise Rules, 1944, Section 2A of Indian Tariff Act, 1934 and Madras Commercial

H and R Johnson (India) Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Ex. and Cus.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173C(2A); Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 95; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(83)ECC393; 2002LC516(Karnataka); 2002(144)ELT506(Kar)

short) had issued a circular dated 8-6-1999 containing instructions regarding filing of declarations. Under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act 1944 and calling upon the appellant to file a declaration in the form prescribed as per the said Circular