Advanced Search Results
Shonkh Technologies Vs. Revenue
Authority for Advance Rulings
Feb-23-2004
Sales Tax
(2004)(93)ECC546
Sawhney, Addl.Director, Directorate General of Central Excise, Intelligence 1. This is an application under Section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act') seeking an advance ruling on the question "whether the process of embossing unique vehicle
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLhoist India Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Authority for Advance Rulings
Aug-30-2007
MRTP
(2007)(123)ECC358
purity burnt Lime having 94-96 per cent of calcium oxide and some impurities - Section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - S.H.s 2522, 2825 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Ruling sought on as to what
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTechnical Concepts Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Authority for Advance Rulings
Oct-06-2005
Service Tax
(2005)(189)ELT15AAR
Appellants: Technical Concepts International Ltd. Vs.Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. (Chairman), Somnath Pal and B.A. Agrawal, Members Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 23C; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Medicinal and Toilet Preparation (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Technical Concepts Vs. Commissioner Central Excise and
Authority for Advance Rulings
Sep-07-2006
MRTP
(2006)(204)ELT251AAR
Shah Mohammad Quadri, J. (Chairman), Somnath Pal and B.A. Agrawal, Members For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Tarun Gulati and Tushar Jaswal, Advs.Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 23C; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Medicinal and Toilet Preparation (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Crystal Interior Products
Authority for Advance Rulings
Oct-12-2004
Land Acquisition
(2005)(98)ECC131
Members For Respondents/Defendant: A.K. Roy, Jt. CDR and Sanjay Singh, Superintendent Interpretation - Advance Ruling--Section 23D(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944--Under Clause (a) of the first proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 23D, the Authority cannot allow the application … first proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 23D, CE Act exists--Application is liable to be rejected.Advance ruling - Section 23C, CE Act - Iron and steel wire--Manufacture of goods already started--No question seeking advance ruling can be entertained
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurbhi Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Authority for Advance Rulings
Dec-05-2006
Excise
(2007)(208)ELT578AAR
1. In this application under Section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short "the CE Act"), the applicant, M/s Surbhi Industries, a partnership firm, is a joint venture of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Bell Packaging (India) Pvt.
Authority for Advance Rulings
Oct-17-2006
Service Tax
by M/s. Bell Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd., a resident private limited company is under Section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short "the Act"). The applicant is carrying on the business of designing and manufacturing plastic packaging of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Digvijay Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-07-1986
Land Acquisition
(1987)(12)LC1121Tri(Mum.)bai
asbestos cement products fall under tariff item 23C of the first schedule to the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The duty of Central Excise is levied under section 3 thereof and as per this charging section, duty … filed the present appeal to the Tribunal against the Order No. V-2(23C)1063/80 dated 7-2-83 of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) Bombay. Under the aforesaid order, the Collector confirmed the Order No. V.23C/18-130/79/1193 dated 27-2-1980 passed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoland Educational and Charitable Trust Vs. Chief Commissioner of Inco ...
Orissa
Sep-17-2008
Direct Taxation
(2009)221CTR(Ori)88; [2009]309ITR50(Orissa)
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Singh Enterprisers v. CCE and Ors. : 2008(221)ELT163(SC) . While considering the provisions of Central Excise Act, 1944 the Hon'ble apex Court held:The proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 35 makes the position crystal clear that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJocil Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Aug-27-2004
Excise
(2005)(98)ECC399
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »