Advanced Search Results

U.K. Paints Industries and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 22(1)

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC38; 2002(144)ELT255(Del)

and not depositing of duty levied upon the petitioners under Section 35F of the Central Excise and Sat Act, 1944. While issuing rule D.B. on 2nd August, 1985 this court noted the question of law relating to jurisdiction, … respondent No. 2 refusing the stay of implementation of order dated 3rd July, 1984 of the Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi and not depositing of duty levied upon the petitioners under Section 35F of the Central Excise … way of the present petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 22nd February, 1985 passed by the respondent No. 2 refusing the stay of

Machinnon Machenzie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 12, 17, 22, 23, 27, 28, 41, 46, 46(1) and 57; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 7

Reported in : 1991(52)ELT190(Bom)

duty - Sections 2, 12, 22 and 46 of Customs Act, 1962, Rule 7 of Central Excise Rules, 1944, Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - petitioner filed bill of … had no jurisdiction to do this for excise duty could be recovered only under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. This rule is worded as under :-'Every person who produces, cures or manufactures any excisable goods, … of the law. Officers like Respondent 2 could not exercise powers provided by the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (CESTA). Their authority was confined to legislation dealing with customs. Respondents were not entitled to demand and/or retain

Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow, U.P. Vs. Chhata Sugar Co. Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1) 8(2), 8(4), 8(5), 10 and 22; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 4, 4,(1), 4(4) and 35L; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 173 and 174G; Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Constitution of India - Article 366 and 366(28); Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantaran Niyamawali, Rules 1974 - Rules 2 and 23; Uttar Pradesh Act - Sections 10(1); Municipal Act - Sections 443 and 548;

Reported in : 2004(92)ECC457; 2004(165)ELT369(SC); JT2004(3)SC167; (2004)3SCC466

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow, U.P. Vs. Chhata Sugar Co. Ltd.

Union Carbide India Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1986SC1097; 1986(8)ECC185; 1986(24)ELT169(SC); [1987]165ITR1(SC); JT1986(1)SC453; 1986(1)SCALE530; (1986)2SCC547; [1986]2SCR162; [1987]64STC444(SC); 1986(2)LC449(SC)

is liable to excise duty under Entry 27(e) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. 2. The appellant, The Union Carbide India Limited, is a public limited company and carries on the business … 21, 1969 was rescinded. 3. The appellant received a letter dated March 3, 1970 from the Superintendent of Central Excise, Lucknow stating that the tariff rate of duty on extruded shapes and sections of aluminium had been raised … of the learned Single Judge and dismissed the writ petition on February 22, 1972. Before the learned Judges an attempt was made by the appellant … Lucknow stating that the tariff rate of duty on extruded shapes and sections of aluminium had been raised and that aluminium cans would be subjected

Cairn Energy India Pty Limited, Surasani Vs. Central Board of Excise a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Cairn Energy India Pty Limited, Surasani Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs, New

The Commissioner of Central ] Excise and Custom, Daman, Vs. M/S. Gujch ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 53, 223B, 9(2); Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 34,6

Matched in: Parties The Commissioner of Central ] Excise and Custom, Daman, Vs. M/S. Gujchem Distillers ] India Ltd., P.O. Devsar

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Mehta and Co.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 11 AB

Matched in: Parties The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Mehta and Co.

State of Kerala Vs. Attesee (Agro Industrial Trading Corporation)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 269, 286, 286(2) and 286(3)

Reported in : AIR1989SC222; 1989(19)ECC60; 1988(38)ELT720(SC); JT1988(4)SC250; 1988(2)SCALE1597; 1989Supp(1)SCC733; [1988]Supp3SCR601; [1989]72STC1(SC)

on the other, of the definition of 'cotton fabrics' in item 19 of the Schedule 1 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, into the provisions of Section 9 read with item No. 7 of the III Schedule … the following:5. Sugar as defined in item 1 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944; 6. Tobacco as defined in item 4 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, … artificial silk fabrics as defined in item nos. 19, 20, 21 and 22 respectively of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act,

Crystal Cable Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 35F, 35G, 35G(1), 35G(3), 35G(4), 35G(5) and 35G(6); ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Section 22; ;Customs Act, 1963 - Section 35F; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

at Andul Road in Howrah district.4. The petitioners contend, that under the provisions of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the petitioners are entitled to deduct freight and insurance charges and also interest on receivables from the invoice … of its adverse financial conditions the pre-deposit may be waived. We are unable to accept this view because Section 22 of SICA will have no application to the provisions of Section 35G, as held by Hon'ble the Supreme

Adhunik Food Products (P) Ltd., U.P. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1)

Reported in : 2007(117)ECC296; 2007LC296(SC); 2007(211)ELT360(SC); JT2007(8)SC338; 2007(6)SCALE22; (2007)9SCC32; 2007(1)LC605(SC)

Matched in: Parties Adhunik Food Products (P) Ltd., U.P. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut