Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi), by Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1956)2MLJ455

illegal the Civil Court had no jurisdiction in accordance with certain provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and as such the-suit ought to be dismissed as not being maintainable.5. In this connection it is necessary … a Civil Court has got jurisdiction to order refund of amounts alleged to have been illegally collected as Central excise-tax on betel-nuts and secondly whether on the facts of the case there has been such illegal collection. The … in good faith done or ordered to be done under the Act.8. This section is somewhat akin to Section 17 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 (Madras Act IX of 1939) which is to the following

Shiv Steel Works and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 40 and 40(2); Central Excise Rules - Rules 9, 10, 11 and 173J; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17(1) - Schedule - Article 113; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT373(Raj); 1980()WLN237

on the unpaid decretal amount at the rate of 9% per annum from today. Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Section 40 and Item 26AA and Central Excise Rules 1944--Rule 11 Expression 'act under Act' No excise duty leviable … have been decreed. His contention is that under Section 40 of the Act read with Rules 11 and 173-J of the Rules, the suit for refund of excise duty erroneously paid does not lie after the expiry

Saurashtra Cement and Chemical Indus. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10 and 10A; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4)

Reported in : 1993(42)ECC126; 1995(79)ELT367(Guj); (1993)1GLR5

for the purpose of Excise duty on the basis of Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. At the time of filing the petition, the only question which … 10 shall be substituted. Thereafter Rule 10 is omitted because of the introduction of Section 11A in the Central Excise Act with effect from 17-11-1980 by Notification dated 12-11-1980. (c) Even in the case of Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd.

Varnica Herbs, Rep. by Power of Attorney V. Viswanathan Vs. Central Bo ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(1), 4A, 37B and 38B; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 82 and 83; Standards of Weights and Measurements (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6, 17, 34 and 34(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 265; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 82

Reported in : 2004(91)ECC493; 2003LC387(Madras); 2004(163)ELT160(Mad)

Matched in: Parties Varnica Herbs, Rep. by Power of Attorney V. Viswanathan Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India,

The Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Muhammad Masud Muhammad MahsIn B ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 35 and 37; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 20; Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1881 - Rule 7A, 7B and 7C; Bombay Salt Act, 1890 - Sections 3 and 17; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 11, 18 and 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58, 100 and 110; Constitution of India - Article 294; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 99 and 100; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 31 and 32;

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR314

India, Sections 99 and 100 of Government of India Act, 1935 and Sections 2, 31 and 32 of Central Excise Act, 1944 - appellants challenged grant of compensation with additional compensation at rate of 12% per annum on adjudicated valuation … Act was passed. The relevant sections of this Act are as follows :-(3) 'Save as otherwise provided by section 17, there shall be prepared as soon as conveniently may be and shall thereafter be kept in every village

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi Vs. Kraftech Products Inc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4A, 11A, 11A(1), 11AA, 11AB, 34 and 83; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Act, 1976; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6, 6(1), 12, 12(2), 17, 17(1), 25 and 34; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q; Central Excise (No.2) Rules, 2001 - Rule 25

Reported in : AIR2008SC2238; 2008(127)ECC21; 2008(153)LC21(SC); 2008(224)ELT504(SC); JT2008(4)SC335; 2008(4)SCALE528; 2008AIRSCW3218; JT2008(4)SC335.

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi Vs. Kraftech Products Inc.

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

it is held that the words 'manufacturing process' in different statutes have different meanings. For instance, in the Central Excise Act, 1944, the word 'manufacture' means bringing into existence a different commodity, though this is not the definition of 'manufacturing … or a shipping bill or bill of export, as the case may be, is presented under Section 50. Section 17 of the said Act provides for assessment of duty and Section 18 provides for provisional assessment of duty.21.

The Leather Corporation of Orissa Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector, Centra ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 69(1990)CLT201; 1990(25)ECC441

Matched in: Parties The Leather Corporation of Orissa Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector, Central Excise and ors.

G.S. Auto International Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Chand ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 15 and 17

Reported in : AIR2003SC986; 2003(85)ECC696; 2003(152)ELT3(SC); JT2003(1)SC428; 2003(1)SCALE340; (2003)2SCC371; [2003]1SCR372

Matched in: Parties G.S. Auto International Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh

Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Financ ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1957Mad110

illegal the civil Court had no Jurisdiction in accordance with certain provisions of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, and as such the suit ought to be dismissed as not being maintainable.5. In this connection it is … firstly whether a civilCourt has got jurisdiction to order refund ofamounts alleged to have been illegally collected as Central Excise tax on betel nuts and secondlyWhether on the facts of the case there has been suchillegal collection. The … act in good faith done or ordered to be done under the 'Act.'This section is somewhat akin to Section 17 of the Madras General Sales-tax Act, 1939 (Madras Act IX of 1939) which is to the following effect:Section