Advanced Search Results

M/S Pooja Cables Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce, Bhopal

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Godrej Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

A.K. Menon, J. 1. The above appeal filed under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act) seeks to raise the following questions of law:- “(a) Whether, under the facts and circumstances of … of the case, the CESTAT was justified in directing to deposit interest liability for the period 14-5-2003 (when Section 11DD came into force) till the day demand of differential amount was paid? (b) Whether in the facts and

Cce, Jaipur Vs. Vinayak Agrotech Ltd

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Rishabh Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)(122)ECC392

arrears of revenue" and all permissible action under the law including the action under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for recovery of the duty assessed under Rule 6 and interest payable thereon. On the issue of availment … made payment of the invoice amount, action should also be taken against the manufacturer-supplier under Section 11D and 11DD of the Central Excise Act, 1944.On the plain reading of the above reproduced Circular of the CBEC, it