Advanced Search Results

Triveni Engineering and Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(112)ECC73

Matched in: Parties Triveni Engineering and Vs. the Commissioner of Central

M.K. Kotecha Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4(1), 11A(1), 11D and 35L; Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 - Rules 6 and 7; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173C and 173C(1); Valuation Rules, 1975 - Rules 1 to 6; Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 2000

Reported in : 2005(98)ECC182; 2005(179)ELT261(SC); (2005)2MLJ157(SC); (2005)1SCC728

Matched in: Parties M.K. Kotecha Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad

Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11A, 11B, 11D, 35E and 35E(2)

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR207; 2002LC798(Bombay); 2003(151)ELT23(Bom)

no orders as to costs. Excise - refund - Sections 11A, 11B, 11D, 35E and 35E (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - dispute between petitioner and department regarding calculation of assessable value was answered in favour of petitioner - … the Excise Act being beyond time, is liable to be quashed and set aside. It was submitted that Section 11D deals with duty of excise collected from the buyers and not paid to the Central Government. It was

Cce, Chennai - Iv Vs. M/S. Invensys India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Cce, Jaipur Vs. Vinayak Agrotech Ltd

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11D and 35H

Reported in : 2004(170)ELT273(P& H)

the application for rectification of mistake in view of the retrospective amendment made in Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ?'2. Accordingly/ the petition is allowed and the Tribunal is directed to draw the statement of the case

Tube Investments of India Limited Represented by Its Vice President, T ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 5, 9(1), 10A, 10A(1A), 10B, 28 to 43C, 43D, 44AC, 64, 72, 80, 80(IA), 80(IE), 143C, 145, 153, 192, 193, 194, 194A, 194C, 194C(1), 194D, 194G, 194H, 194I, 194J, 194LA, 195, 195(5), 195A, 197, 198, 199, 200, 200(1), 201, 201(1), 201(1A), 205, 206C, 221, 271C, 276B and 276BB; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act; Companies Act; Finance Act, 1983; Finance Act, 2007; Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11D; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11(4); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(4), 17 and 17(2); Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1966 - Sections 47(3); Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Partnership Act, 1932 -

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Mad)313; [2009]185TAXMAN438(Mad)

Ltd. v. Union of India). In the said case, the challenge was to Section 11D of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and it was contended that the said Section lacked legislative competence and violative of … of India). In the said case, the challenge was to Section 11D of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and it was contended that the said Section lacked legislative competence and violative of Article 265 of the

Cce Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2004(115)LC868(P& H)

issue--Rejection of application for rectification of mistake--Tribunal directed to refer the question of law to the High Court. Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 11D.;Petition allowed. -

Woodcrafts Products Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1994 - Sections 4, 11A, 11D, 12 and 14; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 10, 52, 52A, 173B, 173C, 173C(2), 173G, 173Q, 209A, 226 and 1730; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 121; Indian Companies Act; Finance Act, 1996

writ petition as Annexure A, issued to the petitioner under Section 11A read with Section 11A(1), 11D(1) of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, (hereafter referred to as the Act) read with Rules 9, 52. 52A, 173C, 173G,

Adarsh Metal Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9(3), 11A(1), 11B, 11B(1), 11B(2), 11B(3), 11B(4), 11C(2), 11D(2), 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D and 37B; Central Excise and Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27(2), 28A(2), 28C and 28D(2); Contract Act - Sections 72; Essential Commodities Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 41(1); Agriculture Produce Act; Madhya Bharat Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1948; Madhya Bharat Sugar Control Order, 1949; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 265; Central Excise Rules; Price Control Order

Reported in : 1993(67)ELT483(Raj)

final order. A specific order was passed by the court. The amended provisions of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act does not have the effect of nullifying that order.'The same view was reiterated in Gopal Hosiery v. Assistant … Item No. 26AA of the Tariff Schedule, as it was then existing, under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1944'). The petitioner claimed that the product manufactured by it properly … 11B or Sub-section (2) of Section 11C or Sub-section (2) of Section 11D.(b) the amount of duty of customs referred in Sub-section (2) of Section