Advanced Search Results

Techno Pack Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 11, 11A, 11B and 11C

Reported in : 1991(1)ALT542; 1991(33)ECC130; 1991(55)ELT158(AP)

issued a Notification, bearing No. 208/84, Central Excise, dated 16-10-1984, in exercise of powers conferred upon it under Section 11C of the Act. Under that notification, the Central Excise authorities are directed not to demand payment of duty … the respondents to refrain from enforcing the Demand Notice No. V/15A/30/656/83. T. 2, dated 29-5-1989 issued by the Central Excise Department, represented by respondents 1 and 2. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows : … and films were classified under Entry 15A (2) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter called 'the Act'). However, this intermediatory product was considered both by the assessee as well as by … to issue revised demand of duty for period not covered by notification--Central Excises and Salt Act (1 of 1944), Section 11-C--Notfn. No. 208/84-CE, dated 16.10.1984. - - The LDPE lay-flat tubings and films were classified under Entry 15A

T.i. Miller Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11C; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 10 and 173D; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A

Reported in : 1991(53)ELT214(Mad)

Matched in: Advocate S. Govindaswamy Nathan, Adv. for E.S. Govindan and ;S. Anbumani, Adv. T. Somasundaram, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel

Mahavir Metal Convertors and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9 and 49; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 11C

Reported in : 1988(17)LC80(Bombay); 1988(36)ELT81(Bom)

benefit of Notification No. 43/75, dated 1st March, 1975 which was issued by the Central Government under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 granting total exemption to such manufacture of a particular gage as mentioned in the … the levy of such duty during the periods aforesaid; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 11C of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the whole of the duty excise and the

Indian Woolen Textiles Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11C; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 1995(50)ECC94; 1999LC593(P& H); 1995(77)ELT847(P& H); (1995)110PLR87

He argued that the Tribunal has misinterpreted the provisions of Section 11C of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. Shri Goyal further argued that in view of the exemption notification, the petitioner has acquired a statutory right … petition involves a challenge to the show cause notice dated 1.10.1986 issued to the petitioner by the Superintendent, Central Excise, Chheharta Range-II, the order dated 21.1.1987 passed by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Amritsar, the order dated 1.6.1989

M.R.F. Ltd. and 15 ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : CustomsExcise

Reported in : 1988(14)LC507(Madras)

to excise duty, it is the admitted case that the First schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, does not contain any specific item under which there could be levy of excise duty on natural rubber. … Counsel for the petitioners.6. Fourthly, learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that there was a notification under Section 11C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, whereunder there is an unambiguous declaration that there was no … the items of natural rubber enumerated therein, including 'smoked rubber sheets' would be outside the purview of the Central Excise levy. These proceedings also to a very great extent support the case of the petitioners that 'natural rubber'

Kaycee Electricals, (Partnership Firm) Thro Mr. Jitender Agarwal, Part ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 11C

Reported in : 2005(82)DRJ289

Writ Petition is allowed limited to the extent aforestated while leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 11-C -- Petitioner engaged in process of making copper wire rods -- Claim of exemption from … before the Tribunal, the Central Government issued a notification being notification No. 3/91 dated 30th January, 1991 under Section 11C of the Central Excises Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act') stating that in view of the practice that

Deepsone Non-ferrous Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Supdt. of Customs and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11C; Central Excise Rules - Rule 56A

Reported in : 1994(74)ELT498(All)

of Finance, Department of Revenue, issued notification on 30-1-1991 under Section 11C under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 wherein they have clarified/notified that on copper wire rods manufactured out of the copper wire bars from the … on a short point.2. By this petition the petitioners seek quashing of the order of the Superintendent of Central Excise, Range Noida, dated 18-7-1985 challenging the said order that the petitioners are not liable to deposit any amount

Cce, Jaipur - Ii Vs. Roopa Ram Suthar

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Chelpark Co. (P) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11AB, 11AC and 11C; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 96ZP(3), 172 and 173Q

Reported in : 2007(119)ECC390; 2007LC390(Karnataka); 2007(216)ELT364(Kar)

copy of this order. Excise - Imposition of Penalty - Levy of - Interest - Section 11C of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 172 of the Central Excise Rules - Respondent claimed the self-removal procedure - Failed to pay

Adarsh Metal Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9(3), 11A(1), 11B, 11B(1), 11B(2), 11B(3), 11B(4), 11C(2), 11D(2), 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D and 37B; Central Excise and Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27(2), 28A(2), 28C and 28D(2); Contract Act - Sections 72; Essential Commodities Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 41(1); Agriculture Produce Act; Madhya Bharat Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1948; Madhya Bharat Sugar Control Order, 1949; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 265; Central Excise Rules; Price Control Order

Reported in : 1993(67)ELT483(Raj)

final order. A specific order was passed by the court. The amended provisions of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act does not have the effect of nullifying that order.'The same view was reiterated in Gopal Hosiery v. Assistant … Item No. 26AA of the Tariff Schedule, as it was then existing, under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1944'). The petitioner claimed that the product manufactured by it properly … the amount of duty of excise referred to in Sub-section (2) of Section 11B or Sub-section (2) of Section 11C or Sub-section (2) of Section 11D.(b) the amount of duty of customs referred in Sub-section (2) of Section