Advanced Search Results
Union of India and anr. Vs. Dharampal Satyapal and ors.
Delhi
Sep-27-2013
Land Acquisition
the said Act and proviso thereto. They are also liable for penal action under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and are also liable to pay interest as per provisions of section 11 AB of the Central Excise … extent of `81,75,625/- required examination of the matter in the light of the provisions for settlement contained in Chapter-V of the Central Excise Act, 1944 whereas the second aspect, namely, the setting aside of the duty demand … 17 and 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. The circular in paragraph 5, however, goes on to say that the officers of the DRI and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Cegat
Delhi
May-18-1994
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 9(2), 173B, 173C and 173Q(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 11A(1)
1994(73)ELT776(Del)
elsewhere than in the factory of production, the procedure set out in Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is followed. The Table in … Central Excise Rules, 1944 falling under Item No. 68 of First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 from so much of the duty livable as is in excess of the amount calculated at the rates … It gave a reply dated 21-3-1991 and on that basis the Collector passed an order on 17-12-1991 demanding Central Excise duty in a sum of Rs. 4,46,99,520.40 from the O.N.G.C., Hazira, Surat under Rule 9(2) of the Central … that factor in mind, we are referring to the facts in brief. 5. The O.N.G.C. is manufacturing lean gas as one of its products. Govt.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGujarat State Fertilizers Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-24-1997
Excise
(1998)(98)ELT840TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Compack Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara
Supreme Court of India
Oct-07-2005
Excise
Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1) 56A, 57A and 57G
AIR2006SC141; 2005(103)ECC1; 2005(189)ELT3(SC); JT2005(12)SC435; 2005(8)SCALE435; (2005)8SCC300
Industry. It opted for the benefit contained in Section AA of Chapter V of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so as to avail the MODVAT credit of the specified duties on plastic coated paper known as 'LDPE … Declaration on or about 2.11.1992 purported to be in terms of Rule 57-G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 declaring LDPE Coated Paper falling under … appeal preferred by the Appellant herein from a judgment and order dated 01.02.2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals) Vadodara, was dismissed.2. The Appellant, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangaba ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-11-1997
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A
1997(92)ELT23(SC); JT1997(10)SC737; (1997)9SCC681
apparatus and parts and accessories thereof of the description specified in the Schedule hereto annexed and falling within Chapter 90 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), from the whole of … - Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Rule 8 (1) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944 - appellant claimed exemption from excise duty as goods manufactured by him were mentioned in notification exempting surgical
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-2016
Service Tax
contrary in the statement of Mrs. Vandana Gupte, Additional General manager, (Fin.) recorded under section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on 24.09.2010 she has inter alia stated that the term ST BT appearing in the contract mean Strengthening … the CESTAT, Finance Act, 2012 was enacted. By this enactment, sections 97 and 98 have been inserted in Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. Section 97 of the Finance Act, 1994 provided for retrospective exemption to … and Site Formation and Clearance, Excavation and Earth Moving and Demolition Service 5. The petitioner is inter alia engaged in the business of:- (i) Construction
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shahnaz HussaIn Wife of Late Shri Nasir Hussian Vs. State of U.P. ...
Allahabad
Aug-20-2007
ExciseCriminal
2008(227)ELT61(All)
thereon, but the Excise Department had issued a show cause notice dated 2.3.1988 under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') and contended that they were manufacturing cosmetic and not Ayurvedic Medicines. The … various products manufactured by M/s Shahnaz Ayhurvedics (accused No. 1) were infact cosmetics and toilet preparations falling under Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 attracting higher rate of Central Excise Duties while the same … The Adjudicating authority besides the above, also imposed the penalty of Rs. 50 lacs on M/s Shahnaz Ayurvedic and Rs. 25 lacs on M/s Shaherb
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShahnaz Ayurvedics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Allahabad
Jan-29-2004
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 35C and 37B; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226
2004(173)ELT337(All)
Tariff Act, 1985, hereinafter called the 'Act 1985'. For that purpose, the provisions of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, hereinafter called 'the Act 1944' were invoked and the matter was also examined as to whether the petitioner … of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.(4) I impose a penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs (Rupees Fifty lakhs only) on M/s. Shahnaz Husain under Rule 209A … proceedings initiated vide show cause notice dated 7-3-1988 were dropped. Assessee was allowed clearance of its products under Chapter 30 of the Tariff Act, 1985, as Ayurvedic medicines. Again, the same controversy arose and the proceedings initiated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Fibres Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-iii
Supreme Court of India
Nov-15-2007
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 35E(4), 37B and 373; Central Excises Rule - Rules 10 and 173B; Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India
2007(123)ECC185; 2007(149)LC185(SC); 2007(218)ELT484(SC); (2008)1SCC434; 2008AIRSCW471
direction of prospective application - Impugned judgment thus not sustainable and accordingly set aside - Appeal allowed - CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944. Section 37-B & Central Excise Tariff Act (5 of 1986), Chapter 39, Heading 39.23, Sub-heading 3923.90: [S.B. Sinha
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSangam Spinners Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-18-2011
Excise
Central Excise Rules 1944 - Rule 57G read with Rule 57B; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapter 55
ambit of the issues raised it may be necessary to set out the various relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 [for short "the Act"], and the Rules framed thereunder and also the various notifications issued which are relevant … the diesel as well as oil and lubricants as required under Rule 57G read with Rule 57B of the Central Excise Rules 1944, [for short … we heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.8. Counsel appearing for the parties drew our attention to Chapter V of the Rules which deals with levy of excise duty on manufactured goods other than salt. Rule
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »