Advanced Search Results

Cyrus Surfactants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2007)(120)ECC443

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

The Commissioner of Central ] Excise and Custom, Daman, Vs. M/S. Gujch ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 53, 223B, 9(2); Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 34,6

The Hon'ble Tribunal had failed to take into account the provisions of Rules 173 Q (1) of the Central Excise Rule, 1944?" 2 The facts necessary to be cited for adjudication of the said substantial questions of law … Rule 9(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with proviso to Section 11A of Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944"3 The said show cause notice was adjudicated upon by the Order in Original dated 6/6/1996. The Adjudicating Authority … engaged in manufacture of various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Ashok Fashion Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Rules; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : 2002(83)ECC410; 2002(141)ELT606(Guj)

those relating to refunds and exemptions from duty'. The Delhi High Court held that Chapter II of the Central Excise Act, 1944 entitled 'Levy and Collection' contained provisions for penalties, but the heading of that Chapter itself was not a … 3(3) of the Additional Duties Act has been used in various Acts and other enactments, but then Article 265 of the Constitution mandates that no tax shall be levied and collected except by authority of law. There

Gujarat State Fertilizers Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(98)ELT840TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Crane Betel Nut Powder Works Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central E ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 35B; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B

Reported in : 2007(116)ECC418; 2007LC418(SC); 2007(210)ELT171(SC); JT2007(4)SC485; 2007(4)SCALE472; (2007)4SCC155; [2007] 4 SCR 109

The appellant went up in appeal before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh under Section 35(B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the said order of the Tribunal dated 12th April, 2005. The High Court confirmed the view taken … after processing them by adding essential/non-essential oils, menthol, sweetening agent etc. Initially, the appellant cleared the goods under Chapter Sub-heading 2107 of the Central Excise Tariff and was paying duty accordingly. However, the appellant filed a revised … sweetening agent etc. Initially, the appellant cleared the goods under Chapter Sub-heading 2107 of the Central Excise Tariff and was paying duty accordingly. However, the

Bakelite Hylam Ltd. Rep. by Manager-taxation Vs. the Customs, Excise a ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 11, 11A, 11A(1), 11AC and 35B; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(2), 173Q and 226; Finance Act, 2000 ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : 2008(161)LC183(Madras)

manufacture of Alkyd Resins and various other products. It has been further stated that Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is the charging Section in terms of which duties specified, under the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff … full description of the excisable goods produced or manufactured or to be produced or manufactured by them, the chapter heading and the sub-heading of the Tariff Act under which such goods would fall, the rate of duty … for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the second respondent. 2. It is stated that the petitioner is a public Limited Company incorporated

M.V. Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Lucknow

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2002)(81)ECC393

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

M/S Markwell Paper Plast Pvt. Ltd and Others Vs. Ccandce, Noida

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Om Prakash and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 9A, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21; Customs Act, 1962; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 (Cr.P.C.) - Sections 2(a), 155, 436, 173; Evidence Act - Section 25

9 shall be deemed to be non-cognizable within the meaning of that Code. (2) Any offence under this Chapter may, either before or after the institution of prosecution, be compounded by the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise … one relating to the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, and the other involving the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944, since the issue in both sets of matters is the same. The common question in these two sets

Collector of Central Excise and 2 ors. Vs. Asoka Rubber Products

Court : Kerala

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1991(33)LC547(Kerala)

cases. The judgment in O.P. No. 1573 of 1989 is reported as Asoka Rubber Products v. Collector of Central Excise 1989 (2) K.L.T. 369 : 1989 (25) ECR 356 Kerala. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgments, the revenue has … common question of law regarding the scope and impact of Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 arises for consideration. The judgments which are appealed against are the one rendered in O.P. Nos. 1573 of … appeal, of duty demanded of penalty levied-Where in any appeal under this Chapter, the decision order appealed against relates to any duty demanded in respect