Advanced Search Results

G.C.Bhatt Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Pension

Acts : CCS Pension Rules - Rule 9

being voluntarily retired, to the shock of his life, petitioner received a memo under Rule 9 of the CCS Pension Rules alleging misconduct of accepting illegal gratification in sum of `1,30,000/- to secure recruitment to a civilian and taking

S.S. Ahluwalia Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 9 and 39; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 43 and 43C; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21; CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 14; CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3(1)

Reported in : 96(2002)DLT374

and arbitrary and vocative of Rule 43(d) of CRPF Rules, 1955 as also vocative of Rule 9 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 as well as vocative of Article 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India. When the

All India Judges Association Vs. Union Of India .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Judicial officer 4.2 Family Pension @30% shall be paid to eligible family member(s) as given in Rule 54 CCS (Pension) Rules 1972 at par with the spouse, after the death of the spouse. 4.3 The quantum of family pension … by V Giri, Senior Advocate. While supporting the contentions made by the Amicus Curiae 7 Hereinafter, “Review Order”. 9 as well as Gourab Banerji, Senior Advocate, he reiterated the need for an urgent implementation of the Report

Sankar Nath Pramanik Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

as "qualifying service" for the purpose of counting pension in the civil service under Rule 19(1) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 after having a break of ten years between the military service and civil service.2. The case of … 18 years. Thereafter the applicant was discharged at his own request as per terms of the engagement i.e. 9 years regular service and 6 years reserved. The applicant received a military gratuity, D.C.R.G. of Rs. 2,325/-. Thereafter

Manohar Singh Chana, Ex. Acio-ii (Tech/ib), New Delhi Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Accordingly, Rule 33 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 defines Emoluments to mean basic pay as defined in Rule 9 (21) (a) (i) of the Fundamental Rules which a Government servant was receiving immediately before his retirement or … substantive appointment was required to making such a Government servant to exercise the option under Rule 19(2) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, within three months of date of issue of such order in writing and also bring the provisions

R. Rama Murthy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)(2)SLJ35CAT

of Rs. 201/- and the terminal benefits on Rs. 403/- on 28.6.80 as per Rule 37-A of the CCS (Pension) Rules. According to the then existing rules, the applicant is not entitled to receive any further amount by way … is filed by the applicant, who is a retired pensioner, for a declaration that the impugned letter dated 9.5.01 issued by the Accountant General (A&E), Orissa vide Annexure-I as void and illegal being violative of Articles 14,

K.R. Subbanna Vs. Delhi Kannada Senior Secondary School and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

undisputed position before me that employees of the respondent no.1/school including the petitioner are governed by the relevant CCS Pension Rules as also Central Civil Services Leave Rules in view of the order of the Director of Education dated … proceedings are pending. It is also argued that entitlement to withhold the pension and gratuity in terms of Rule 9(1) of the Pension Rules is only after there is a final order of the disciplinary authority charged/guilty or

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Mr. T.P. Venugopal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Central Civil Service (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rules 3 and 14; Central Civil Service (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(2)(1) and 4 to 18; Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules - Rules 8(5), 8(5)(2), 9 and 9(2); Discipline and Appeal Rules

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT433; 2008(3)SLJ381(Delhi)

supervisor.3. During the pendency of the enquiry respondent superannuated on 30.4.1998. Thereafter enquiry under Rule 9(2) of the CCS (Pension) Rules was conducted and in consultation with the UPSC, Disciplinary Authority, vide order dated 21.8.2001 imposed penalty of withholding

Savita Devi Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the petitioner would not be as per said rules and that the admissible pension would be under the CCS (Pension) Rules 1972, which was being paid. 6. At the second round of litigation, the petitioner questions the order dated … Pioneer and earned promotion as a Painter under General Road Engineering Force (GREF). 3. Thinking that Army Pension Rules 1982 would govern the entitlement of the petitioner for family pension, WP(C) No.7518/2008 was filed. The department never … Decision has been conveyed to the petitioner under cover of order dated 9.3.2011 holding that since death of late Painter Roshan Lal i.e. husband of

K.C. Uttreja, S/O Late Shri Vs. the State Government of Nct of

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

provision for grant of interest on pension and other heads of retiral dues, not being incorporated in the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, but provided by the ratio decidendi declared by the Apex Court would hold the field. It is … applicant for grant of interest with regard to those retiral dues on which interest is admissible as per rules keeping in view the law in this regard as well as rules governing the same and pass appropriate … Pay and Accounts Officer applicant was drawing a basic pay of Rs. 9,000/-. The retiral dues were released to applicant on 17.12.2003 but on a