Advanced Search Results

Sher Singh Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Pension

Acts : CCS (Pension) Rules - Rules 41, 24

of dismissal from service being inflicted, it may be directed that in terms of Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, a compassionate allowance be sanctioned and be paid to the petitioner. 17. We note that as per the

Ramesh Kumar Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Pension

Acts : CCS Pension Rules - Rule 41

petitioner were to file a representation to the competent authority seeking compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the CCS Pension Rules, the same would be considered in accordance with law. 7. Learned counsel for the respondent would urge that

Union of India, represented by its Secretary, to the Government of Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

was removed from service for unauthorised absence, the pensionary benefits were forfeited in terms of Rule 41 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. 7. Challenging the said order dated 12-6-2014 and a consequential order dated 07-11-2014, the 1st respondent filed

Balbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

advised to make a representation to the Competent Authority for considering his case under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 which reads as under:‘41. Compassionate allowance (1) A Government servant who is dismissed or removed from service

Balbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

advised to make a representation to the Competent Authority for considering his case under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 which reads as under:‘41. Compassionate allowance (1) A Government servant who is dismissed or removed from service

Ex. Constable Chander Bhan Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

aforesaid plea of the petitioner is without proof of any documents before us. 14. Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, reads as under:- "41. Compassionate Allowance (1) A Government servant who is dismissed or removed from service shall

B L Koli vs United India Insurance Company Ltd & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

as if the Government servant had continued in service.”46. The Pension Scheme is thus broadly aligned with the CCS (Pension) Rules. Rule 41 embodies the foundational principle that pension is conditioned upon future good conduct; Rule 42 provides the power to

Babu Lal Koli vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Government servant had continued in service.”46. The Pension Scheme is thus broadly aligned with the CCS (Pension)Rules. Rule 41 embodies the foundational principle that pension is conditioned upon future good conduct; Rule 42 provides the power to … years before such institution.”45. Similar provisions exist in other pensionary frameworks. For instance,Rules 8 and 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, contains analogous stipulations, including the requirement of consultation with the Union Public Service Commission before passing final

Sreelal L.B vs Union of India Represented by Its Secretary

Court : Kerala

writ petition concerns the non-grant of compassionate allowance to the petitioner in terms of Rule 41 of the CCS Pension Rules.3. The petitioner contends that he preferred Ext P2 representationon 29.11.2021 before the 2nd respondent requesting compassionate allowance in

Jacob Chandy and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ107CAT

and his service throughout was substantive service liable to be treated as qualifying for pensionary benefits under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Second Ship Yard since 1969 was being called as Cochin Ship Yard Project. During 1972 the … service throughout was substantive service liable to be treated as qualifying for pensionary benefits under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Second Ship Yard since 1969 was being called as Cochin Ship Yard Project. During 1972 the … Department of Expenditure, New Delhi and Ors., 1993 SCC (L&S) 495=1993(3) SLJ 41 (SC).Bhaskar Gajanan Kajrekar v. Administrator, Dadra and Nagar Havelt and Ors., 8.