Advanced Search Results

M/s D. N. Singh Through Partner Dudheshwar Nath Singh Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

SUBMISSIONS OF PARTIES ............................................................................................................ 15 C. ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 18 D. A CARRIER, A BAILEE?. ................................................................................................................... 30 E. THE CARRIAGE BY ROAD ACT, 2007 .............................................................................................. 34 F. CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST ....................................................................................................... 35 G. THE SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930 .................................................................................................... 36 … 05.03.2009 in M.A. 214 of 2002, the High Court has dismissed the Appeal filed by the appellant under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the Act’, for short). The assessment year involved … MAL DISTINGUISHED BY HIGH COURT ...................................................................... 43 L. “OTHER VALUABLE ARTICLE” ........................................................................................................ 75 1 M. PRINCIPLE OF EJUSDEM GENERIS; NOSCITUR A SOCIIS ............................................................ 81 N.

Essemm Logistics Vs. Darcl Logistics Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

6. It may be noted that the plaintiff-first respondent is a common carrier and is governed by the Carriage by Road Act, 2007 (new Act) which came into force with effect from 20.07.2010 repealing the Carriers Act, 1865.7. The Carriers Act, … which came into force with effect from 20.07.2010 repealing the Carriers Act, 1865.7. The Carriers Act, 1865 vide Section 10 provided that no suit shall be instituted against the common carrier for the loss of, or injury

Mr Puran Joshi (Prorietor of Sj Cargo Movers) vs Deccan Edibles Pvt Lt ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

technical observations regarding the Statement of Truth, territorial jurisdiction, and the lack of a registration certificate under the Carriage by Road Act, 2007. However, the pivot of the rejection was the Commercial Court‟s observation that the export documentation (such as Mate‟s … Sakshi Mehley, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.:INTRODUCTION:1. The present Appeal, preferred under Section 13 of theCommercial Courts Act, 2015, challenges the judgment and orderdated 09.12.2023 [hereinafter “Impugned Judgment”] passed by the … whereby the Commercial Court rejected the Appellant‟s suit for recovery under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to

M/s. Transway Cargo Lifters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

I may record that the Carriers Act, 1865 during the pendency of this appeal was repealed by the Carriage By Road Act, 2007 but the same is of no significance to the issues for adjudication therein. 17. Qua territorial jurisdiction also, … to a decree for a sum of Rs.19,81,280/- against the defendant? OPP 7. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to any interest? If yes, at what … 1. This first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree dated 30th July, 2005

Navata Road Transport Rep. by Its Manager and Another Vs. M/S Fortune ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the complaint is not maintainable because of the respondent not issuing mandatory notice as per Sec.16 of Carriage by Road Act, 2007 and that the letters Exs.A4 to A6 of the staff of the respondent company do not extent cause … to indemnify the respondent to the extent of cost of the consignment. 7. Feeling aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, the opposite parties … claim before the District Forum and the disposal of the matter today by us will be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in the light of the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in

Shri Venkateshvara Logistics Vs. The Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

recipient fails to pay the bailment charges and other incidental or related expenses incurred.20. Section 15 of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007 provides “15. Right of common carrier in case of consignee’s default.- (1) If the consignee fails to take … defective”. The lorry and the goods were stationed at Bijapur. This was followed by a summons under Section 70 of the CGST Act addressed to the driver of the lorry and 6 the authorized representative of the

Bellary Iron and Ores Pvt. Ltd., Mspl Ltd., Ramgad Minerals and Mining ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act 1994 - Sections 65, 65(23), 65(50), 65(105), 73(1), 76, 77, 78 and 80; Motor Vehicles Act - Section 2(24); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Motor Vehicles Taxation Act; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Rule 5

Reported in : [2010]21STJ214(CESTAT-Bangalore); 2010[18]S.T.R.406; [2010]24STT557; (2010)35VST107(CESTAT-Blore)

submissions. The dispute involved in this case is mainly whether transportation of goods by road using a goods carriage by an owner of the goods carriage is exigible under the category GTA. The impugned demands are raised and … Ores Pvt. Ltd (BIOL) confirmed the following liabilities against it.(i) Service tax Under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act 1994 (the Act) Rs. 72,85,191/- and applicable interest.(ii) Penalty Under Section 76 of the Act : Rs. 200/- … Ltd (BIOL) confirmed the following liabilities against it.(i) Service tax Under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act 1994 (the Act) Rs. 72,85,191/- and applicable interest.(ii)

Dr. Anahita Pandole Vs. State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Depart ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilEnvironment

Acts : Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 3, 4, 39, 52, 117, 122, 312 to 313A, 314, 328, 328(3) and 328A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 28, 39, 41, 41(4), 109(3), 110, 110(1), 110(3), 112, 206 and 207; ;Environment Protection Act, 1986; ;Maharashtra Urban Areas Tree Preservation Act, 1975 - Sections 8(4); Bombay Police Act - Sections 33 and 102; ;Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(105) and 67; ;Main Roads Act, 1930 - Sections 33B; ;National Highway Act; National Highway (Land and Traffic) Act; Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Rules - Rules 48, 62(2), 72(2), 160, 206, 207 and 208; Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 - Rules 12(1), 92, 105 to 111, 123 to 125A and 126; ;Motor Vehicles (Prescription of Conditions for Exemption) Rules, 1991; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 198

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR72; 2008(3)BomCR516; (2008)110BOMLR1555

they should not obstruct the flow of the traffic on the main roads or even on the side carriage roads. It is their specific contention that it will be inequitable to pass any injunctive order against them.9. … such powers, the licences/permissions have been issued vide letter dated 9th May 2007. In other words, the whole case of the Applicants as well as … operate the mobile van. In terms of condition 7, these could be permitted in the concerned zone … developing city. The State and other development authorities utilise huge public funds for planned development including laying of roads to ensure more convenient accessibility to various parts of the city or town and to ensure free flow … and should not be disadvantageous to the public health. Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') had been subjected to innumerable amendments … the State Legislature has now done so by Section 4 of Gujarat Act 8 of 1966. The

Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

defined in section 2(16) to mean:“2(16) “heavy goods vehicle" means any goods carriage the gross vehicle weight of which, or a tractor or a road-roller … compensation of the victims of hit and run cases; (i) removal of time limit for filling of application by road accident victims for compensation; (j) punishment in case of certain offences is made stringent; (k) a new pre-determined … another class of transport vehicle to the driving licence already held before the commencement of the Motor Vehicles Act, 2007. Rule 8 of the Rules of 1989 inserted on 10.4.2007 is quoted below :“8. Minimum educational qualification for … or road-roller the unladen weight of any of which, does not exceed 7,500 kilograms;” Medium goods vehicle has been defined in section 2(23) to mean

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. State of Punjab and ors. . . .

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

purposes of this clause,“road transport service”. means a service of motor vehicles carrying passengers or goods or both by road for hire or reward”. (47) “transport vehicle”. means a public service vehicle, a goods carriage, an educational institution … the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; (ii) the petitioner in CWP No.9826 of 2007 purportedly filed in public interest, besides the relief(s) sought at Sr.No.(i) above, … formulated by the Government of Punjab in exercise of its powers under Section 99 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as also the subsequent modifications made in the Scheme on October 21, 1997 or thereafter. They also … 17084 & 2077 of 1999; 4001, 4002, 4003, 5780, 5781, 5782, 5783, 7096 & 9254 of 2000 in addition to their prayer to strike down