Advanced Search Results

NabiruddIn Ahmed Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : CivilBanking

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; All India Services (Death-cum Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16(3); Central Bank of India Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 - Regulations 4 and 6(7); Central Bank of India Officer Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1976 - Regulations 3.1 and 24; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420 and 468

1993-II-LLJ-626.In Narendra Kumar Maheshwari's case (supra), the Apex Court dealt with an issue arising out of Section 3 Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947. In Paragraph 106 of the judgment, the Apex Court opined that since the guidelines on which the petitioner … that the Article of Charges listed would constitute misconduct within the meaning of Regulation 3.1 read with Regulation 24 of Central Bank of India Officer Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1976 attracting penalty under Regulation 4 of Central Bank

Mrs. Geeta Kapoor, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Capital Issues Control Act, 1947; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 19(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81, 81(1)(A), 82, 397 and 399; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act - Sections 24

Reported in : III(2005)BC369; [2006]132CompCas369(Delhi); (2005)5CompLJ13(Del); 119(2005)DLT33

that the entire amount financed bythe company was repayable in 24 equated monthly installments, for which the borrower issued post dated cheques.3. It has been further averred that the borrower did not make timely payments leading to … Manager Shri Rajeev. 3. That they also threatened to the complainant that in case he shall initiate any action either in the Court or the police, he shall be implicated in the false criminal case and shall … for quashing of a First Information Report alleging commission of offences under Sections 392, 452 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal

N. Parthasarathy Vs. Controller of Capital Issues and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3(6), 55A, 61, 62, 63, 72 and 81(1A); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 39, 136, 226 and 298; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1991SC140; [1991]72CompCas651(SC); (1991)2CompLJ1(SC); JT1991(2)SC218; 1991(1)SCALE675; (1991)3SCC153; [1991]2SCR329

to its letter dated 26.7.89 intimated that the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 gave their consent to the issue by L&T; Ltd. of 12.5% secured fully convertible debentures of the value … has also been alleged that this consent has been given hurriedly within 24 hours of the making of the application for consent to the Controller … 22.9% without any consideration whatsoever for agreeing to such reduction and to pass on their vested rights Under Section 81 of the Companies Act to preemptive allotment of shares in Larsen & Toubro to the members, debenture

Consumer Education and Research Vs. T.T.K. Pharma Ltd. and ors.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1990)68CompCas89NULL

the public issue had been expressly authorised and approved by the Central Government under the provisions of the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947, no order under Section 37 could be passed and also registration of any agreement regarding this issue is … recognize as affording grounds for relief, whether such debt or beneficial interest be existent, accruing, conditional or contingent." 24. It is apparent from the definition that secured debentures are not actionable claims. It is also obvious that

Oswal Agro Furane Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1989(24)LC533(P& H)

Matched in: Citation 1989(24)LC533(P& H)

Standard Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Finance Act, 1956

Reported in : [1963]49ITR218(Bom)

share capital again, the company had to obtain the consent of the Controller of Capital Issues under the Capital Issues Control Act, 1947. Such a consent was obtained on the 27th July, 1955, and the consent granted was that the company … 1950. The consent granted by the Assistant Controller of Capital Issues (who was the appropriate authority appointed under section 10 of the Act), was for the issue of 8,000 ordinary shares of Rs. 100 each at par. … and Printing Works Ltd., received by the Standard Mills amounted to Rs. 24,87,251 (Rs. 28,48,312 minus Rs. 3,61,061) and the new share capital share capital

United Bank of India Ltd. Vs. United India Credit and Development Comp ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(3), 173, 372, 372(13), 372(14), 391, 392, 393 and 394; ;Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Section 6; ;Banking Regulation Act, 1949; ;Enemy Properties Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 7(3) and 8(1)

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas689(Cal)

para. 8 and the scheme of amalgamation, para. 5. He referred to Sections 3 and 5 of the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947, whereunder there is a complete prohibition of issues of shares without permission of the Controller of Capital Issues … Act, 1949. The registered office of the petitioner-bank is situate at No. 24, Park Street, Calcutta. The authorised capital of the petitioner-bank is Rs. 4,00,00,000 … Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Sections 391, 392, 393 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, for sanction of a scheme of amalgamation and

Hindustan Lever Employees Union Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81(1) and (1A), 173, 391, 391(1) and (7), 393(1), 394 and 394A

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR465; [1995]83CompCas1(Bom); (1995)ILLJ1099Bom

the solitary control on the price of shares, viz., sanction of the Controller of Capital Issues under the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947, was abolished by the Government of India by repealing the said Act on May 29, 1992. Consequent on … V.A. Mohta, J.1. These are five appeals under section 391(7) of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'), against a common order dated March 3, 1994, made by … together and are being disposed of by this judgment. 2. Appeal No. 244 of 1994 is by the Federation of Tata Oil Mills and Allied

Pally Ramulu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Secr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 F. - Sections 5, 9, 11 and 15

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT158

440@ 481. While dealing with the powers of the Controller of Capital issues under the provisions of the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947, the Supreme Court held:'That apart, whatever may have been the position at the time the Act was passed, … a learned single Judge of this Court by a speaking order dismissed the writ petition holding that under Section 9 of the Registration Act no duty is cast on the Inspector-General of Registration and stamps, the 3rd … which was disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court on 24-4-1992 observing that prima facie the writ petition raised arguable questions and one

In Re: Cetex Petrochemicals Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 73(2A) and (2B), 391, 391(2), 393 and 394

Reported in : [1992]73CompCas298(Mad)

also conditional upon and subject to the approval and consent of the Controller of Capital Issues under the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947, to the shareholders of the transferor-company pursuant to the scheme of amalgamation. It is further stated that the … place. It was pointed out that, at the prevailing price of Rs. 24, a lot of 100 Cetex shares is now worth Rs. 2,400. At … by Cetex Petrochemicals Limited, having its registered office at No. 12, Bishop Wallers Avenue (East), Mylapore, Madras-4, under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, for sanction of the scheme of amalgamation approved by the