Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: capital issues control act 1947 section 13 · Page 1 of about 883 results (0.140 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 15 1987

Consumer Education and Research Vs. T.T.K. Pharma Ltd. and ors.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : May-15-1987

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1990)68CompCas89NULL

the public issue had been expressly authorised and approved by the Central Government under the provisions of the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947, no order under Section 37 could be passed and also registration of any agreement regarding this issue is … Trade Practices Enquiry Nos. 158 to 185 of 1986 (except 178 of 1986) 72, 149, 148, 49 and 138 of 1986. A copy of the judgment is being placed in every file while the original one is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1988

Godore Tools (India) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-25-1988

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1988)25ITD193(Delhi)

In particular, he pointed out that CCS did not flow from Section 3 of the Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947. He submitted that whereas the earlier schemes could, be said to have aimed at compensation for certain disadvantages … of India [1985] 152 ITR 308, i.e., all liabilities are to be deducted for the purpose of computing capital employed, which shall have the effect of the Revenue's appeal on the point being allowed and the assessee's … not entitled to any weighted deduction on the following items : Identical issues had come up before the Special Bench, as also before the Division … issue in the earlier case of Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd. v. ITO [1981] 130 ITR 405 (Cal.). (iii) The Karnataka High Court held in Patil Vijaykumar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1992

Madan Gopal Jajoo and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-12-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Capital Issue (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(6); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 61, 62 and 63; Constitution of India - Article 226; Capital Issues (Application for Consent) Rules, 1966

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi253; [1996]85CompCas153(Delhi); ILR1992Delhi877

of Economic Affairs and the second is the Controller of Capital Issues (CCI) exercising its functions under the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 (for short 'the Act).2. The petitioners have sought a writ of certiorari, or any other writ, or direction … effect on the capital market and would affect the right of almost whole of the investing public. - Section 13: [Altamas Kabir & Cyriac Joseph,JJ] Custody of child - Welfare of child vis--vis comity of Courts - The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 1995

In Re: Novopan India Limited;

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-29-1995

Subject : Company

Acts : Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 21, 81, 100, 101, 101(2), 102, 102(1), 102(2), 173, 176, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 393, 393(1), 394 and 394A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 85

Reported in : [1997]88CompCas596(AP)

(xiii) Though fresh capital cannot be issued without the permission of the Controller of Capital Issues under the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947, section 3, where a scheme envisages increase of capital the fact that permission for issue of fresh capital was … Government with regard to the procedure to be followed in cases where reduction of share capital was involved. 13. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the transferee company is proposed to be reduced from Rs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1971

The Punjab Distilling Industries Ltd Vs. Biermans Paper Coating Mills ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-15-1971

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155

Reported in : [1973]43CompCas189(Delhi); ILR1972Delhi431

the Central Government while approving the collaboration agreement and giving consent to the issue of capital under the Capital Issues Control Act, 1947. The said allotment being in contravention of Section 3 of the said Act is punishable under Section 13

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 1983

industrial Development Bank of India and ors. Vs. B. Ananthaswami and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-22-1983

Subject : Company

Acts : Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 75(1) and 155

Reported in : [1986]60CompCas99(Mad)

the petition may be delineated as follows : On March 15, 1974, the first respondent applied under the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 (XXIX of 1947), of the consent of the Central Government for its proposal to issue 13 lakhs equity … of the company and guaranteed by a third party or entered into jointly with a third party;' 9. Section 13 contemplates penalty for violation of the provisions. It is an indisputed proposition that where the statute lays down

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2007

Carona Ltd. Vs. Parvathy Swaminathan and Sons

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-05-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 - Sections 22; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 13 and 13(1); Saurashtra Rent Control Act, 1951 - Sections 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 20, Rule 12

Reported in : AIR2008SC187; 2007(2)BLJR3030; 2007(6)BomCR801; JT2007(11)SC484; (2008)1MLJ51(SC); 2007(11)SCALE630; (2007)8SCC559

into force with effect from March 31, 2000. It repealed the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The Preamble of the Act recites;An Act to unify, consolidate and amend the law relating to the control … Patel and Ors. : [1976]1SCR535 . In Gajanan, the Court was called upon to consider clause (e) of Section 13(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 which read thus;13(1)(e). That the tenant … to the case on hand inasmuch as tenant's net worth/paid up share capital has been substantially eroded and it was not rupees one crore or … the matter on merits.MERITS OF THE MATTER17. The Trial Court framed necessary issues and held that the defendant-Company was the tenant; the Rent Act was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1963

Kalinga Tubes Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shanti Prasad JaIn and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-18-1963

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 9, 31, 81, 105C, 166, 172, 173, 255 to 259, 397, 397(1), 398, 399(1), 399(3), 402, 403 and 433; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1963Ori189

Matched in: Advocate B.K. Pal, S. Choudhury and Bijoy Pal, Advs.;Attorney General of India, ;R. Choudhury, ;M.K. Banerjee, ;B.C. Sen and ;S. Patnaik, Advs. (in No. 13/61), ;B.K. Behura, Adv. (in No. 2/62), ;P.C. Misra, Ad A.C. Mitra, ;B.N. Duttarai, ;S. Roy Choudhuri, ;R.N. Misra and ;G. Das, Advs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1999

Raghunath G. Panhale (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. M/S. Chaganlal Sundarji and Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-13-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House, Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitutioin of India - Articles 136 and 227

Reported in : AIR1999SC3864; JT1999(8)SC219; 1999(6)SCALE503; (1999)8SCC1; [1999]Supp3SCR629; 2000(1)LC141(SC)

the legal principles applicable to the case. Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 uses the word 'the premises are reasonably and bona fide required by the landlord for his own occupation … his heirs. On merits, the trial Court held that there was no proof of lock-out, no proof of capital available for investment, no proof of preparations for business and that the appellant had no experience in grocery … shall refer to a few of them which are relevant to the issue before us. It was stated in Bega Begum and Ors. v. Abdul

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1966

State of West Bengal Vs. Motilal Kanoria

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-15-1966

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 134(1); Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 5; Imports and Exports (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1960; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 3(2); Defence of India Rules - Rule 84(3); Imports and Exports (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1966SC1586; 1966CriLJ1210; [1966]3SCR933

1963 by which the conviction of the respondent Motilal Kanoria under s. 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 and the sentence of fine of Rs. 200/- (in default simple imprisonment for one month) imposed by the … licence is granted to you subject to the following conditions :- (a) In case the project involves any capital issue and if such capital issue is not sanctioned the licence is liable to cancellation. (b) That if … Konnaggar, Eastern Railways (Ex. 1). On May 26, 1955 a licence was issued (Ex. 3). The licence read as follows :- 'This licence is issued … may be in force at the time of their arrival. Sd. Illegible Section Officer 26-5-55 for Chief Controller of Imports and Exports. 26-5-1955. Issued from … J.1.This is an appeal by certificate under Art 134(1)(c) of the Constitution against the judgment of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial