Advanced Search Results

M.S. Murthy and Others Vs. Gold Stone Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rules 97 to 99 and 91 to 101; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Jagirdar Regulation Act, 1958

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD817; 1999(1)ALT97

District Judge had no jurisd`iction to entertain applications to resist execution of decree passed by High Court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Stone and others. After the said assignment M/s. Gold Stone Exports and others have signed application Nos.992,993 and 994 of 1995 and IA 15 of 1996 before this Court for the reliefs including of M/s. Gold Stone

Abharan Singh and ors. Vs. Lal Bahadur Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1915)ILR37All165

- Sale of mortgaged property in contravention of terms of section--Right of representatives of mortgagor to redeem. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … It seems to me that the only question we have to decide is what is the effect of Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act, which was in force at the date of the purchase by Rani

Smt. Jairaji Vs. Firm Jagarnath Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rule 95, 97 and 99

Reported in : AIR1976All1

the resistance offered - without substance and unacceptable - cannot be said to be in good faith. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … another application (25-C) praying that her objections be treated under Section 151 or Order XXI. Rule 95 or 99, Civil Procedure Code. The Court, therefore, did not dismiss (21-C) but gave time to the decree-holder to file

Queen-empress Vs. Dalip and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All246

duty as such--Arrest without sufficient authority, but in good faith--Assault on Police making arrest--Right of private defence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the case. There appears to have been some confusion in thought or argument in the Court below, as Section 99 of the Indian Penal Code was considered in reference to Section 332. The Sessions Judge found that Nazir

Nardev Vs. Joti Saroop and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 79, 81, 82 and 99

Reported in : AIR1964All83

from another constituency - petition held not defective for non joinder of such candidate from another constituency. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a candidate not already a respondent, te apply to the Election Tribunal, for being joined as a respondent. Section 99 specifically lays down that al the fine of making an order under Section 98 -- i. e. at

ibrahim Khan and ors. Vs. Gowram Kondaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (T.A) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 - Sections 98 and 99; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD422

to appellant under said Act - held, Civil Court has no jurisdiction to deal with said matter. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … deals with Protected tenants. It may be suffice for the present purpose to look into Sections 98 and 99 of the said Act dealing with Summary eviction and Bar of jurisdiction, respectively. Even if these provisions are

Behari Bharthi Vs. Bhagwan Gir and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All114; 1Ind.Cas.162

and also a simple money decree against the same judgment-debtor-Sale in execution of combined decrees not unlawful. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … amount of both the decrees. The court below seems to have been of opinion that the provisions of Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act were contravened, and refused to confirm the sale, without deciding the other

Bhartu and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 97 and 99

Reported in : AIR1954All35

held, if the latter person is an aggressor , a trespasser has a right of self defence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … toit and serve out their sentences. Leave toappeal to Supreme Court is refused. Criminal - private defence - Section 99 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - even if a person is a trespasser and wrongfully cultivated a

Ram Bhajan and Another Vs. Abdul Rahman and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96 and 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 104

Reported in : AIR1997All17

of the weakness of other in further appeal in High Court - same matter cannot be taken. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … stands confirmed. The parties are directed to bear their own costs.10. Appeal dismissed. Civil - appeal - Sections 99 and 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Appellate Court is Court of facts - where Trial

Sudhir Kumar Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Orders 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1; U.P. Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 117, 237 and 239; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC30; (2001)1UPLBEC237

public auction or inviting tenders in proper way - appeal not sustainable as agreement done in collusion. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.