Advanced Search Results

Bhadur Singh Vs. the District Judge, Rampur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 33 and 46; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1966 - Sections 98 and 111

Reported in : AIR1975All12

jurisdiction to set aside the Order of award passed by the Registrar under the provision of arbitration. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … As the award had been made under Section 71, an appeal would have lain against the award under Section 98 (1) (h) of the Act. Orders passed under Section 97 and Section 98 of the Act have been

Gopal Lal and anr. Vs. Ram Karan Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, rule 103; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 98

Reported in : AIR1974All44

limitation period of one year to start running from the date of the decision of the revision. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Karan Singh filed objections under Clause (2) of Rule 97. The executing Court allowed the application under Rule 98 of Order XXI, C. P. C. rejecting the objections raised by Ram Karan Singh claiming that in accordance

ibrahim Khan and ors. Vs. Gowram Kondaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (T.A) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 - Sections 98 and 99; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD422

to appellant under said Act - held, Civil Court has no jurisdiction to deal with said matter. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Chapter IV deals with Protected tenants. It may be suffice for the present purpose to look into Sections 98 and 99 of the said Act dealing with Summary eviction and Bar of jurisdiction, respectively. Even if these

Bhagwan Das Vs. Nannu Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1917)ILR39All114

- Execution of decree--Auction purchaser deprived of property purchased--Suit for refund of purchase money--Sale not set aside--Procedure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of first instance restored with costs in all courts. Civil Procedure Code (1908), Order XXI, Rules 92 and 98 - Execution of decree--Auction purchaser deprived of property purchased--Suit for refund of purchase money--Sale not set aside--Procedure. -

Hindustan Coca-cola Beverages (P) Ltd. Vs. Authority Under A.P. Shops ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - Sections 48 and 49

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ872AP

avail alternative remedy depends on discretion of Court - held, Lower Court erred in dismissing writ application. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - dismissal of writ application on ground of availability of alternative remedy under Section 98 (3) - presence of alternative remedy not an absolute bar to maintainability of writ petition - question as

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

HOTHUR TRADERS, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (ADMN), NO.5, 6, 7 & 8, BESIDE NANDI SCHOOL, INFANTRY ROAD, CANTONMENT, BELLARY. M/S. MEHBOOB TRANSPORT COMPANY, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (ADMN), NO.5, 6, 7 & 8, BESIDE NANDI … writ petitions, petitioners have assailed Gazette Notification bearing No.248/FD2006dated 16/08/2008 issued by the State Government under -:132. :- Section 98-A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for the sake of brevity). (b)

Zafu Javeed Vs. V. Narasimha Reddy and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 2(2), 35(1), 58(3), (4), 96, 97(1), (2), 98(1), (2), 99(1), 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 107 and 110 - Order 29; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) Amendment Act, 1976

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD663; 1998(6)ALT608

Court under Order 21 Rule 103 - only miscellaneous appeal under Section 104 maintainable against such Orders. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … extract certain provisions of CPC. Order 21 relates to the execution of the decrees and orders. Rules 97, 98, 100, 101, 103 and 104 are extracted below:'97. Resistance or obstruction to possession of immovable property .'--(1) Where

Duryodhan Vs. Sitaram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951- Sections 90, 90(1), 90(2), 90(3), 92, 98, 99, 109, 110, 116A and 116B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rules 8 and 9 - Order 17

Reported in : AIR1970All1

petition - Sections 90 (1) and 92 authorizes the election tribunal to dismiss the proceeding in default. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … applicant was that an order dismissing the petition for default of appearance was an order of dismissal under Section 98(a) of the Representation of the People Act. Such an order was appealable under Section 116 of the Act,

Muppidi Dora Reddy Vs. Bollareddy Ramakrishna Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 21, Rules 64, 96, 98, 100 and 102; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR2003AP299

alleged was subsequent to filling of suit so hit by Rule 102 and doctrine of lis pendens. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … case, the tenancy alleged is hit by Rule 102 of Order 21 C.P.C., which lays down that Rules 98 and 100 would not apply to resistance or obstruction in execution of a decree for possession of immovable

Cantonment Board and ors. Vs. Jagat Paul Singh Cheema

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ60

possess any power to set aside the decision of the Board and all that it possessed under the Cantonments Act was the power to direct the Board to consider or reconsider the matter.4. The Cantonment Board has filed … to the filing of this Letters Patent Appeal may be slated thus:Respondent, Jagat Paul Singh Cheema was a Sectional Officer with Cantonment Board, Jammu. The Board proceeded against him for his alleged misconduct in committing various acts