Advanced Search Results
Smt. Jairaji Vs. Firm Jagarnath Prasad and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-22-1975
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rule 95, 97 and 99
AIR1976All1
the resistance offered - without substance and unacceptable - cannot be said to be in good faith. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … issued on 7-9-1972. On the same day the decree-holders auction purchasers moved an application under Order XXI, Rule 95, Civil Procedure Code for possession over the said house after removal of locks etc., if any. On 18-9-1972
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Shakuntala D ...
Allahabad
Dec-13-1989
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95, 95(2) & (4) and 96
II(1990)ACC359; 1991ACJ177; AIR1991All48
liable to compensate the heirs of the deceased insured who dies in accident involving the insured vehicle. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of his judgment that the deceased was covered by the words 'any person' occurring in the above quoted Section 95. He held that as the deceased was the co-owner and had implied authority of the other co-owner and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: R.K.S. Motors Private Ltd.
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-28-2003
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 95, 97, 97(3), 394 and 397
[2004]50SCL261(AP)
97 - held, no separate notice intimating Registrar under Sections 95 and 97 need to be given. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dalip Rai Vs. Deoki Rai
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Tenancy
(1899)ILR21All204
tenant--Effect on tenant's right of his neglecting to apply under Section 95 to be restored to possession. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Aziz and anr. Vs. Walikhan
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1875)ILR1All338
lesssee by lessor--Suit for Compensation--Civil Court--Revenur Court--Jurisdiction--Act XVIII of 1873 (N.W.P. Rent Act, Section 95, Clause (m). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirraj Singh Vs. Ram Singh and Himanchal Singh
Allahabad
Oct-24-1914
Property
(1915)ILR37All41
question by Revenue Court--Suit in Civil Court with the object of defeating the Revenue Court's decree--Res judicata. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the other hand, the defendant relies on Sections 95 and 167 of the Tenancy Act, II of 1901. Section 95 provides that a suit can be brought either by the tenant or the landholder for a declaration of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheoambar Ahir and ors. Vs. the Collector of Azamgarh and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-24-1912
TenanyCivil
(1912)ILR34All358; 14Ind.Cas.138
of certain customary dues payable to the zemindar by the ryots of the village--Civil or Revenve Court--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … withdrawn from the cognizance of the civil court are not triable by that court. It is argued that Section 95 read with Section 167 excludes the present suit from the cognizance of the civil court. Section 167 provides
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShimbhu NaraIn Singh Vs. Bachcha and anr.
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1880)ILR2All205
Act XVIII of 1873 (N.W.P. Rent Act), Section 95 - Determination under Clause (n) of titel--Res judicata. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Maharaja of Benares Vs. Angan
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Tenancy
(1885)ILR7All112
XII of 1881 (N.W.P. Rent Act), Sections 10, 95(a)--Suit by landlord to determine nature of tenant's tenure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Lanco Industries Ltd.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-08-1999
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A
2000(1)ALT746; [2000]242ITR357(AP)
question of law arises for consideration. Application: Also to current assessment year. Decision: In favour of assessee. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … made towards the alleged unaccounted commission to V. R. Koneru, a non-resident Indian, and the addition of Rs. 95,93,200 made towards the alleged unexplained share capital investments in the names of friends and relatives of the directors
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »