Advanced Search Results

Malik Muhammad Karim and ors. Vs. Ganga Pande and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All334

(N.W.P. Bent Act), Sections 93, 94 - Suit for recorded share of profits--Suit for settlement of accounts--Limitation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Damodar Das and anr. Vs. Budh Kuar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All179

for costs--Civil Procedure Code, Section 220--Act IV of 1882 (Transfer of Property Act), Sections 86, 87, 94. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Kashi Vs. Bajrang Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1908)ILR30All36

(Transfer of Property Act), Sections 92 and 94 - Mortgage--Redemption-Subsequent suit for profits received by mortgagee barred. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

ilam Singh Vs. Vith Addl. District Judge, Muzaffarnagar and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47, 73 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 72, 84, 84(1) and (2), 85, 86, 90 and 94

Reported in : AIR1991All34

the deposit - non compliance - sale a nullity - Court has discretion to forfeit the deposit. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of mandatory provisions - Sections 47 , 151 and Order 21 Rules 72, 84 , 85 , 86, 94 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - decree holder obliged to make the deposit - non compliance -

Sundar and ors. Vs. Khuman Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All613

Civil and Revenue Court--Act XIX of 1873 (North-Western Provinves Land Revenue Act), Sections 62, 91, 94, 241. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) vs Delhi Cantonment Board, Th ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax by the respondent. However, on 1st December 2021, the respondent issued notices under Section 116 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter ‘Act’), seeking information for the purpose of assessment of property tax. This was followed by another notice … this Court vide order dated 3rd April, 2025, passing the following directions:-Signed By:VIVEK W.P.(C) 2270/2026 Page 2 of 94. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner was given a personalhearing by the respondent. The petitioner also filed

Suriti Krishna Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Sections 6, 6(A), 15, 15(1), 17, 17(1), 28, 45, 77, 87, 87(1), 91, 92, 93, 93(1), 93(2), 94 and 904; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2002; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD524; 2008(5)ALT727

Department dated 10.2.2004.(2) Review petition filed by Sri M.R. Balakrishna, S/o. Ramulu, R/o. 1-6-219, Condoli Bazar, Secunderabad. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the same, the writ petition to be allowed.4. The learned A.G.P. for Endowments however placed strong reliance on Section 94 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (hereinafter, in short, would be

Andhra Evangelical Luthern Church and ors. Vs. B. Syamsundar and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 - Sections 23; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1993; Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 1996

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD191

or by application before District Judge - Civil Court not competent to try disputes of above nature. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … is allowed to proceed with the suit rather than discontinue the proceedings. It is well settled law under Section 94 of the CPC whenever ends of justice is interested and interference is needed, the Court shall certainly come

Farooqi (M.S.) Vs. Anti-corruption Commission (by Chairman and Members ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1969)IILLJ78J& K

servant can be held only at the instance of the Government), and also unlike the Prevention of Corruption Act 2006 (under which no Court can take cognizance of an offence of bribery punishable under Sections 161 to 165 … under:Union Public Services, All India Services, Union Public Service Commission and entry 94 is as follows:Inquiries, surveys and statistics for the purpose of any of … Mal v. Nathu Mal it has been held as follows:A law pertaining to the control of rents In cantonment areas falls within the ambit of entry 3 of List I of Schedule VII under the Constitution. The … on their behalf. Preliminary objections are taken that the Commission constituted under Section 5 of the Jammu and Kashmir Prevention of Corruption Act, 1962, exercises

Saraf Infra Projects Ltd. and Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal and Or ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

the writ petitioners have not challenged the Constitutional validity of the Works of Defence Act, 1903 or the Cantonment Act, 2006 as unreasonable or interfering with their right to property’. Learned Counsel submitted that there is no … writ petitioners have not challenged the Constitutional validity of the Works of Defence Act, 1903 or the Cantonment Act, 2006 as unreasonable or interfering with their right to property’. Learned Counsel submitted that there is no question of … of ITC Ltd.-vs.-Agricultural Produce Market Committee, (2002) 9 SCC232 wherein at paragraph 94 of the judgment it is observed as follows:“94. Although Parliament cannot legislate … Single Judge by filing WP No.704 of 2012 seeking a declaration that Sections 628 and 629 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 (In short