Advanced Search Results

Duryodhan Vs. Sitaram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951- Sections 90, 90(1), 90(2), 90(3), 92, 98, 99, 109, 110, 116A and 116B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rules 8 and 9 - Order 17

Reported in : AIR1970All1

petition - Sections 90 (1) and 92 authorizes the election tribunal to dismiss the proceeding in default. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Prabhu Dayal Tiwari and Others Vs. Lakhan Singh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24, 91, 92, 104 and 115 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC41

Order can be revised - Order cannot be appealed as it grants leave to file to suit. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … heard and is being decided finally at this stage.2. The instant revision arises out of the proceedings under Section 92, C.P.C. and is directed against the judgment and order passed by the District Judge, Jhansi, dated 4.12.1992, granted

Uma Shanker and ors. Vs. Salig Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 and 92(1) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1975All36; MANU/UP/0010/1975

as a manager of trust has all the rights and incidental rights to manage the endowed property. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … is endowed property so as to bind strangers to the trust can he granted in a suit under Section 92 of the C. P. Code? 2. Whether the plaintiffs in a suit under Section 92 of the C.

Gopal Krishna Vs. Lal Kishan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 - Order 20, Rule 1; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 331(1A)

Reported in : AIR1978All48

on him in subsequent proceedings - declaration of place of temple outside the scope of Section 92. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Sita Ram and ors. Vs. Madho Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All44

with the Transfer of Properly Act--Subsequent suit fur redemption not barred--Ciril Procedure Code, Sections 13, 214--Res judicata. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … it is not necessary to consider the provisions relating to such a circumstance, and I pass on to Section 92, which directs that 'in a suit for redemption if the plaintiff succeeds the Court shall pass a decree

Dondh Bahadur Rai and ors. Vs. Tek NaraIn Rai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1899)ILR21All251

accompanied by payment in full--Res judicata--Act No. IV of 1882 (Transfer of Property Act) Sections 92, 93. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Hari Singh and anr. Vs. Umrao Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1979All65

land for more profits - such sale held for benefit of estate and not invalid in law. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Singh, defendant No. 2, had executed the agreement to sell and oral evidence about it was barred, that Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act did not permit any evidence to be led, to add to or vary

Ram Chandra Sharma and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 92 and 100; Uttar Pradesh Factories Rules, 1950 - Rules 6 and 13

Reported in : AIR1956All4; 1956CriLJ2; (1956)ILLJ10All

of Rules 6 and 13 of U.P. Factories Rules, 1950 and shall be accordingly prosecuted and punished. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Chandra Sharma, Brijnandan, Niranjan Lal, Keshav Chandra, Jagdish Prasad and Hoti Lal Das who have been convicted under Section 92, Facto-lies Act, 1948, for the breach of Rr. 6 and 13, U. P. Factories Rules, 1950, framed under

Prag NaraIn Vs. Brahmadatt and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1976All25

must be acted upon by all jointly - in the absence of even one suit is incompetent. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … learned District Judge, Etah, dated 27th April. 1971. The suit giving rise to this appeal was filed under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It related to the trust created by one Smt. Gomti widow of

Madho Ram Vs. Mulchand and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All421

- Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement--Act I of 1872 (Evidence Act), Section 92--' Between the parties.' - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.