Advanced Search Results
Sree Radhakrishna Vegetable, Oil Products Co. Vs. the Collector of Cen ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-28-1998
Excise
1998(62)ECC23
the credit and raised the demand of Rs. 2.03,486.50 allowing the deduction only from the accumulated balance. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … thousand rupees under notification No. 45/89 simultaneously, whereas the conditions prescribed under both the notifications 27/87 and 39/ 89 that the credit accumulated shall not exceed Rs. 1,000/- per tonne of vegetable products cleared. He was. therefore,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaja Ram Singhji Vs. Chunni Lal
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1897)ILR19All205
sale--Act No. IV of 1882 (Transfer of Property Act) Section 89-- Civil Procedure Code, Sections 291, 310A. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmeer and ors. Vs. Sub-divisional Magistrate, Varanasi (S) and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-13-1968
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 53, 75, 78, 79, 81, 83, 85, 86 and 89; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107
AIR1970All115
under Section 89 - matters dealt under by Nyaya Panchayat classified into civil, criminal and revenue cases. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vummethala Somamma Vs. Thameeru Balanagamma
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-21-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rules 89 and 90 - Order 21, Rules 89 and 90
AIR2003AP45; 2002(6)ALD214
- relief not availed by petitioner - petitioner cannot seek setting aside of sale by revision petition. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the revision petitioner has not availed the relevant provisions for seeking to set asidethe sale either under Rule 89 or Rule 90 of Order 21 of the Civil Procedure Code. Therefore, whether the present revision petition filed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChunni Lal Vs. Harnam Das
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1898)ILR20All302
Act), Section 89--Order absolute for sale--Limitation--Act No. XV of 1877 (Indian Limitation Act), Schedule ii, Article 179. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdullah Vs. Jitu
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1900)ILR22All216
Criminal Procedure Code, Sections 87, 88, 89 - Absconding offender--Proclamation and attachment--Sale of attached property--Title of purchaser. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanga Dihal Rai Vs. Mahabir Prasad Pande and ors.
Allahabad
Jun-18-1919
Contract
(1920)ILR42All7
of his contract--Suit for recovery of consideration paid--Execution of decree--Civil Procedure Code (1908), Order XXI, Rule 89. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.B.C. Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-03-1998
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(1), 256(1) and 256(2)
[1999]236ITR335(AP)
In Favour of Revenue A. Y.: 1988-89 Income Tax Act 1961 s.37(1) Income Tax Act 1961 s.256(2) - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSafdar HusaIn Khan Vs. Muhammad Habibullah Khan
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1885)ILR7All25
and recovery of profits--Act XV of 1877 (Limitation Act), Section 10, Schedule ii, Nos. 62, 89, 120. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsghar Ali Khan Vs. Khurshed Ali Khan and anr. and Two ors.
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Contract
(1902)ILR24All27
Article 89 - Suit for account between principal and agent--Termination of agency--'Movable property'--Money--Evidence as to account stated. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »