Advanced Search Results
ilam Singh Vs. Vith Addl. District Judge, Muzaffarnagar and Others
Allahabad
Apr-19-1990
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47, 73 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 72, 84, 84(1) and (2), 85, 86, 90 and 94
AIR1991All34
the deposit - non compliance - sale a nullity - Court has discretion to forfeit the deposit. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … been made by the decree holder.4. The petitioner alleged that there has been a violation of Rules 84, 85 and 86 of Order 21, C.P.C., therefore, the auction sale in favour of the decree holder is void
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. G.G. Satyanarayana and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-23-2002
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 21, 31(7) and 85(2)
2002(5)ALD810; 2003(2)ARBLR391(AP)
of new Act - new Act applicable - petition however partially allowed as rate of interest reduced. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under the old Act.11. There is a saving provision under the new Act. The saving provision incorporated under Section 85 of the new Act reads thus:85. Repeal and saving:--(1) The Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 (6 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuryadevara Satyanarayana (Died) by L.Rs Vs. Hirachand
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-10-2002
ContractProperty
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16
2003(1)ALD849
for relief - held, in equity plaintiff is defaulter and cannot seek relief prayed for by him. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was felt perhaps insufficient and hence the contract itself provided that before 7-4-1976 the plaintiff has to pay 85% of the consideration including the sum of Rs. 10,501/- already paid on 7-1-1976 whereupon the land should be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
RiyazuddIn Vs. Commissioner, Milk Dairy Development and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-07-2003
Service
Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 103; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees' Service Regulations, 1975 - Regulations 84(1) and 85(1)
2003(1)AWC521b
be given within 3 months from the date of production of a certified copy of the Order. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … counsel further pointed out that it was essential for the authorities to serve charge-sheet as required under Regulation 85 of the Service Regulations followed by regular departmental proceeding before passing order of dismissal. The submission further proceeds
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJitendra Kumar Agarwal Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-27-1998
Labour and Industrial
Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 84 and 85; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 14(1)
1998(2)ALD(Cri)892; 1999(1)ALT799; (1999)IIILLJ1604AP
and 85 - held, Order passed by Magistrate is without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChairman, Managing Director, National thermal Power Corporation Ltd. a ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-26-2001
CompanyArbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(6) and 85(2); Arbitration Act, 1940
2001(4)ALT432; [2003]113CompCas23(AP)
of arbitrator liable to be set aside and parties at liberty to take recourse to arbitration agreement. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … letter dated March 28, 1995, the petitioner reiterated its earlier stand. Thereafter the respondent filed Writ Petition No. 8502 of 1995 seeking appointment of an arbitrator which was disposed of on October 14, 1996, directing the respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRafiq Khan and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Allahabad
Jul-08-1953
Criminal
Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 85; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1954All3
Magistrate has no jurisdiction to modify the order of conviction and sentence passed by a panchyati adalat. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and were sentenced to fine. Against this order a revision was filed before the Sub-Divisional Magistrateof Puranpur under Section 85, Panchayat Raj Act. The learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate quashed the conviction of one of them, namely, Abdul Hafiz Khan
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBanshi and ors. Vs. State
Allahabad
Sep-21-1951
Criminal
Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 83, 85(5) and 89; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 435
AIR1952All38
Panchayati Adalat - Section 85(5) overrides provision of Criminal Procedure Code - no revision of the order. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevi Prasad Vs. Chairman of the Court of Election Tribunal, Gorakhpur ...
Allahabad
Nov-19-1954
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 83, 83(1), 83(2), 85, 86, 90 and 90(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 15
AIR1956All19
election petition not to be treated as a composite document consisting of two or more separate documents. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was granted 15 days time to remove the defects failing which the application was to be dismissed under Section 85 of the Act. The Assistant Secretary, however, added. 'This letter is to be read as without prejudice to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.H. Panjani Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Allahabad
Jul-22-1958
Labour and IndustrialConstitution
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 85; Constitution of India - Article 245
AIR1959All24
which is not technically a Factory yet engaged in manufacturing process - delegation of power not unconstitutional. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … In this Court the same argument has been advanced but in addition it has also been contended that Section 85 of the Factories Act amounts to an unconstitutional delegation of legislative powers and involves an unreasonable restriction on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »