Advanced Search Results

Uni Metal Alloys Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. Apseb, Hyderabad and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 78-A

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD558

after expiry of 3 years - held, respondent cannot withdraw it during initial period of 3 years. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in that behalf by the State Government arc binding on the State Electricity Board in view of Section 78(A) of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and that the Board has no power to withdraw such a concession

Cit Vs. Sb. Naseema Begum and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]258ITR503(AP)

Matched in: Advocate S. R. Ashok, for the Revenue Y. Ratnakar, for the Assessees in R. G. Nos. 53, 69, 77 and 78 of 1989 B. Murali Krishna, for the Assessees in R. C. Nos. 65, 106, 107, 116 and

In Re: Reference Under Section 46 of Act No. 1 of 1879

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1897)ILR19All293

Board certified by the Secretary--Public Officer--Act No. I of 1872 (Indian Evidence Act), Sections 74, 76, 78. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Mumtaj Vs. The Director General of Defence Estates and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the land, in St. Thomas Mount-cum-Pallavaram Cantonment Board, which is, presently, governed under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 2006. The lands in the cantonment area are regulated, by the Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937. Under the said … Munsif Court, Alandur. During the pendency of the said suit, the officers of the St. Thomas Mount-cum- Pallavaram Cantonment Board had started to demolish the construction being put up at the Dargah, on 30.1.2014, on the instructions … the petitioner had sent a legal notice to the 10th respondent, under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code. 6. It had been further stated

Rajive Raturi versus Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.970; 2024 INSC 858

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … v Union Public Service Commission [2021] 12 SCR 311 : 2021 INSC 78; Gulf Goans Hotels Co. Ltd. v. Union of India [2014] 10 SCR … Act which creates a mechanism for mandatory compliance - Union Government to delineate mandatory rules, as required by Section 40, within three months from the date of this Judgment - This exercise may involve segregating the non-negotiable

Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)16VST387(Raj)

which came into existence after the commencement of the Constitution constituting municipalities or other institutions of self-governance like cantonments, notified area or panchayats had provided for levy and collection of octroi, that is to say, tax on … provisions of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 shall be recognised for the purpose of this Act.140. Thus, Section 78 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 has been incorporated by reference, which, inter alia, provides for establishing … uxjh; fudk;ksa }kjk O;kikfjd xfrfo/k;ksa dks Facilitate djus gsrq o'kZ 2005&06 o 2006&2007 esa fd;s x;s O;; dh lwpuk miyC/k djkus ckcr A lUnHkZ% foHkkxh;

Dondapati John Vs. Vaddi Subrahmani and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 10, 28(2), 28(7), 29 and 78(2)

Reported in : AIR1965AP260

suit without leave of Court - such suit filed without leave of Court deserves to be dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … debt form limitation. The subordinate Judge was not inclined to extend the provisions of Section 29(2) read with Section 78(2) of the Provincial Insolvency Act to this case as requested by the counsel for the plaintiff. He opined

Keshav Jadhav Vs. Election Commission of India, Delhi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 10A and 78; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 89(1), 89(6) and 89(8); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2001AP538

of natural justice specifically excluded by statutory provision - order of disqualification cannot be challenged by petitioner. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … further says that the total of the said expenditure shall not exceed such amount as may be prescribed.12. Section 78 makes it mandatory on the part of every contesting candidate at an election shall, within thirty days from

Kandhya Lal Vs. Manki

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All56

and Administration Act), Section 78 - Act No. IX of 1872 (Indian Contract Act), Section 129--Administration--Surety--Continuing guarantee. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

State of Himachal Pradesh. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131, 262 (2), 363, 3; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 78, 54(3); Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 23 Rule 6(a); Government of India Act, 1935 - Section 290-A; States Merger (Chief Commissioners Provinces) Order, 1949; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Section 11; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970 - Section 38

the plaintiff to its share of power generated in the Bhakra-Nangal and Beas Projects has been acknowledged by Section 78 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 titled “Rights and Liabilities in regard to Bhakra- Nangal and Beas Projects”. … units of the Indian Union was sovereign and independent in the sense the American colonies or the Swiss Cantons were before they formed their federal unions. The Constituent Assembly of India, deriving its power from the sovereign