Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax A.P.-ii, Hyd. Vs. P.B. Jai Sing

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72(3), 75, 77(1), (2). 78(1) and 263; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 24(1)

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD709; 1998(6)ALT431

77 permits losses of unregistered firm to be set off against income of partner of registered firm. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

ibrahim Ali Khan Vs. Registrar of Co-op. Societies, Government of A.P. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 4(2), 50, 51, 52, 59, 76(1 and 2) and 77

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD791

or 4 (2) - Registrar's refusal to entertain revision petition upheld on ground of lack of jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Societies,Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, in RC N0.68614/98-L1, dated 22-9-1998 rejecting the revision petition filed by him under Section 77 of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964, (for short 'the Act').2. The petitioner joined the services of

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.B. Jai Singh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72, 75, 77(1) and 263

Reported in : [1999]237ITR513(AP)

assessment year. Income Tax Act 1961 s.72 Income Tax Act 1961 s.75 Income Tax Act 1961 s.77 - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Balak Ram Vaish Vs. Badri Prasad Avasthi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Uttar Pradesh Home Guards Adhiniyam, 1963 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Article 191; State Legislature Members Prevention of Disqualifications Act - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh State Legislature Members Prevention of Disqualifications Act, 1951; State Legislature Members (Prevention of Disqualifications) (Second) Act - Sections 3(2); Uttar Pradesh State Legislature Members (Prevention of Disqualifications) (Second) Act; 1952; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 127B; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rule 114; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 77, 77(1), 77(3) and 123(6)

Reported in : AIR1969All88

per Section 77 - incurring or authorizing expenditure in contravention of Section 77 amounts to corrupt practice. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

E.i.D. Parry (India) Ltd. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(9) and 77

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT567; (2002)IIILLJ145AP

Order claiming contribution from appellant not justified as 'hamalies' not designated as employees under Section 2 (9). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and Company v. Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, 1995 (1) LLN 165, he contended that as per Section 77(1-A) of the Act claim for contribution beyond five years prior to the demand notice is barred, and since

Firm Deokishan Srigopal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Formerly Dominion of ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80; Railway Act, 1890 - Sections 77 and 80

Reported in : AIR1966All16

railway zones involved - loss in transit - held, notice given to one railway zone is valid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … consignments were due to misconduct and negligence on the part of the defendant Railway Administration. The claim under Section 77 of the Railways Act in respect of the above Hems was made by the plaintiff to the Chief

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Smt. Azizn (Widow) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 31

Reported in : AIR1960All131

to determine the reasonable date of delivery - in present case suit was within limitation period-Revision dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … been raised in this revision before us, one of limitation and the other in regard to notice under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act. 2. A perusal of the plaint shows that the plaintiff filed this suit

Cit Vs. Sb. Naseema Begum and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]258ITR503(AP)

Matched in: Advocate S. R. Ashok, for the Revenue Y. Ratnakar, for the Assessees in R. G. Nos. 53, 69, 77 and 78 of 1989 B. Murali Krishna, for the Assessees in R. C. Nos. 65, 106, 107, 116 and

Khairati Vs. Divisional Commissioner and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rules 35, 58 and 77

Reported in : AIR2003All238; 2003(1)AWC775

of failure on part of authorities to perform their statutory duties petitioner cannot made to suffer loss. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … remedy by way of appeal before the Commissioner against the order passed by the District Magistrate under Rule 77 of the rules. The petitioner, therefore, had to file an appeal before the Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut, on

Khadim HusaIn Vs. Bharat Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1912)ILR34All315; 14Ind.Cas.433

to register--Appeal to Registrar--Refusal to register based on inability to procure attendance of executants--Suit to compel registration. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … order of the court below was right on two grounds; the first is that no suit lay under Section 77 of the Registration Act because the non-attendance of the executants at the office of the Sub-Registrar is equivalent