Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 74 · Page 1 of about 6,920 results (0.079 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 19 2014

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … assessment done by the Assessing Officer does the stage of „bilateral assessment‟ in the form of objections under Section 74 comes into play and which undoubtedly provides for an opportunity of hearing as is being demanded by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2014

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … assessment done by the Assessing Officer does the stage of „bilateral assessment‟ in the form of objections under Section 74 comes into play and which undoubtedly provides for an opportunity of hearing as is being demanded by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2014

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … assessment done by the Assessing Officer does the stage of „bilateral assessment‟ in the form of objections under Section 74 comes into play and which undoubtedly provides for an opportunity of hearing as is being demanded by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 13 2002

Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Dealers Association and ors. Vs. Governm ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 74(3); Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Rules - Rule 177; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 21

Reported in : AIR2003AP134; 2002(6)ALD530

permits under Rule 177 - held, G.O. does not violate fundamental rights or principle of natural justice. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of Section 74 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Through the impugned order, the 2nd

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2002

State of A.P. and ors. Vs. Singam Setty Yellananda

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-2002

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 35 and 80; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : AIR2003AP182; 2003(2)ARBLR92(AP)

damages - held, decree passed by Trial Court after giving detailed reasoning needs no interference in appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the relevant provisions of the Indian Contract Act in the this regard in general and Sections 73 and 74 of the said Act, in particular. The learned Counsel also had drawn my attention to a decision of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 1968

Virendra Swarup Vs. President of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-24-1968

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 183 and 226; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 67A, 74 and 157; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Constitutional Law

Reported in : AIR1969All56

of termination of term - held, elected officer of a legislature prohibited from becoming life tenure holders. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … elected having secured the largest number of votes. The notification notifying the election of the petitioner issued under Section 74 of the Representation of the People Act was made on 6th of May, 1968. 4. According to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2002

Gorantla Venkateswarlu Vs. B. Demudu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-26-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 72 and 74

Reported in : AIR2003AP251; 2003(2)ALD649

and no fraud committed - held, allegations made by appellant in his complaint found to be false. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … one of the Nationalised Banks, in my considered opinion, it is an 'official body' within the meaning of Section 74 of Evidence Act and so records of its acts would be 'public documents' within the meaning of Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 1976

State of U.P. Vs. Chandra Gupta and Co.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-04-1976

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70 and 74; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 56 and 115

Reported in : AIR1977All28

Limitation Act, 1908 - suit for recovery of refund money not the same as suit for compensation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … not forfeit the security deposit made by the plaintiff. Reference was made by him in this connection to Section 74 of the Contract Act, which reads as under:'When a contract has been broken, if a sum is named

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1908

Jote Singh Vs. Chokhey Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-07-1908

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All73

of shares to which plaintiff was entitled by Hindu law--Estoppel--Suit in Civil Court on title after partition. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … plaintiff had an opportunity, of which he should have availed himself, of objecting to the defendants' title (see Section 74 of Act XVII of 1876, the Revenue Act which was then in force). Had he raised the question

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1961

Virat Pal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-31-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 73, 74A and 77C; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1963All2

of goods by railways - railway could not get protection of defective packing - liable for damages. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the time of delivery that the cases were broken and had been re-nailed. The question is whether Section 74-A of the Indian Railways Act gives a complete protection to the railway. 3. The whole law on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial